Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Clinton speech that Obama should burn into his brain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:01 PM
Original message
The Clinton speech that Obama should burn into his brain
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 11:08 PM by MannyGoldstein
On November 14th, 1995, President Bill Clinton gave the following speech on the occasion of the federal government shutdown due to an impasse with crazy Republicans.

Please read it. This is what presidents do.

(Note to the appeasement crowd - we won that one, big time. The thing ended with Gingrich and the Republicans in flames.)

Good afternoon. Today, as of noon, almost half of the federal government employees are idle. The government is partially shutting down because Congress has failed to pass the straightforward legislation necessary to keep the government running without imposing sharp hikes in Medicare premiums and deep cuts in education and the environment.

It is particularly unfortunate that the Republican Congress has brought us to this juncture because, after all, we share a central goal -- balancing the federal budget. We must lift the burden of debt that threatens the future of our children and grandchildren, and we must free-up money so that the private sector can invest, create jobs, and our economy can continue its healthy growth.

Since I took office, we have cut the federal deficit nearly in half. It is important that the people of the United States know that the United States now has proportionately the lowest government budget deficit of any large industrial nation. We have eliminated 200,000 positions from the federal bureaucracy since I took office. Our federal government is now the smallest percentage of the civilian work force it has been since 1933, before the New Deal. We have made enormous progress, and now we must finish the job.

Let me be clear -- we must balance the budget. I proposed to Congress a balanced budget, but Congress refused to enact it. Congress has even refused to give me the line-item veto to help me achieve further deficit reduction. But we must balance this budget without resorting to their priorities, without their unwise cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, in education and the environment.

Five months ago I proposed my balanced budget plan. It balances the budget in the right way. It cuts hundreds of wasteful and outdated programs, but it upholds our fundamental values -- to provide opportunity, to respect our obligations to our parents and our children, to strengthen families and to strengthen America -- because it preserves Medicare and Medicaid, it invests in education and technology, it protects the environment, and it gives the tax cuts to working families for child rearing and for education. Unfortunately, Republican leaders in Washington have put ideology ahead of common sense and shared values in their pursuit of a budget plan.

We can balance the budget without doing what they seek to do. We can balance the budget without the deep cuts in education, without the deep cuts in the environment, without letting Medicare wither on the vine, without imposing tax increases on the hardest-pressed working families in America. I am fighting for a balanced budget that is good for America and consistent with our values. If they'll give me the tools, I'll balance the budget.

I vetoed the spending bill sent to me by Congress last night because America can never accept under pressure what it would not accept in free and open debate. I strongly believe their budget plan is bad for America. I believe it will undermine opportunity, make it harder for families to do the work that they have to do, weaken our obligations to our parents and our children, and make our country more divided. So I will continue to fight for the right kind of balanced budget.

Remember, the Republicans are following a very explicit strategy announced last April by Speaker Gingrich, to use the threat of a government shutdown to force America to accept their cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, to accept their cuts in education and technology and the environment.

Yesterday they sent me legislation that said -- we will only keep the government going, and we will only let it pay its debts if and only if we accept their cuts in Medicare, their cuts in education, their cuts in the environment, and their repeal of 25 years of bipartisan commitments to protect the environment and public health.

On behalf of the American people, I said no. If America has to close down access to education, to a clean environment, to affordable health care, to keep our government open, then the price is too high.

My message to Congress is simple -- you say you want to balance the budget, so let's say yes to balancing the budget, but let us together say no to these deep and unwise cuts in education, technology, the environment, Medicare and Medicaid. Let's say no to raising taxes on the hardest- pressed working families in America. These things are not necessary to balancing the budget. Yes to balancing the budget, no to the cuts.

I know the loss of government service will cause disruption in the lives of millions of Americans. We will do our very best to minimize this hardship. But there is, after all, a simple solution to the problem. All Congress has to do is to pass a straightforward bill to let government perform its duties and pay its debts. Then we can get back to work and resolve our differences over the budget in an open, honest, and straightforward manner.

Before I conclude, I'd like to say a word to the hundreds of thousands of federal employees who will be affected by this partial shutdown.

I know, as your fellow citizens know, that the people who are affected by this shutdown are public servants. They're the people who process our Social Security applications, help our veterans apply for benefits, care for the national parks that are our natural heritage. They conduct the medical research that saves people's lives. They are important to America, and they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. I will do everything I can to see that they receive back pay and that their families do not suffer because of this.

But it is my solemn responsibility to stand against a budget plan that is bad for America and to stand up for a balanced budget that is good for America. And that is exactly what I intend to do.

Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Agreed. No modern President has ever lost the battle when it comes to ............
a government shut-down. Although, the way Gibbs handles press relations, he may be the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why?
Edited on Sun Dec-05-10 11:09 PM by ProSense
Since I took office, we have cut the federal deficit nearly in half. It is important that the people of the United States know that the United States now has proportionately the lowest government budget deficit of any large industrial nation. We have eliminated 200,000 positions from the federal bureaucracy since I took office. Our federal government is now the smallest percentage of the civilian work force it has been since 1933, before the New Deal. We have made enormous progress, and now we must finish the job.

Let me be clear -- we must balance the budget. I proposed to Congress a balanced budget, but Congress refused to enact it. Congress has even refused to give me the line-item veto to help me achieve further deficit reduction. But we must balance this budget without resorting to their priorities, without their unwise cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, in education and the environment.

President Obama announced a modest pay freeze and judging from that response you think he should give a speech about eliminating 200,000 federal jobs?

"U.S. achieves biggest one-year deficit reduction in American history"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-05-10 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. In that speech Clinton was trying to out repub the repubs while trying to sound reasonable. That's
not a model for leadership, it's a model for shifting the blame and capitulation. It was in essence a a fighting retreat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. He took a less-shitty stand, but it was a stand. And he won.
The mind-blowing thing is that most Americans want higher taxes on the rich, want a public option, and so forth. If Obama took a stand, he'd win both on the policy and political fronts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So what you really want is Obama to sound tough and pound his fist
even if what he's "taking a stand" for is more conservative than what he's currently doing. It doesn't surprise me that you have a Dean avatar. He was more centrist than Obama but he sounded tough in his centrism. You don't want progressive policy as much as you want to be entertained with macho speeches. I get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes,
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 02:00 AM by ProSense
triangulating is principled if Obama says: I love you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. There's something to be said for a Dem president who takes a stand.
I'd almost forgotten what it's like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
8. I miss Bill.
The Republicans thought that they could get away with shutting down the government, it backfired and Clinton had the last laugh. Gingrich and the "Contract with America" crowd went down in flames the following election cycle. Clinton was able to outfox the Repugs at their own game. Obama just got steamrolled by them. The tax cuts for the wealthy will remain in place.

I'm tired of politicians and their power games. The country is in a constant state of stress. People who are lucky enough to have jobs are afraid to lose them. Others who have already lost their jobs are worried about putting food on the table and keeping a roof over their heads. The only person I know who remembers worse times is my 92 year old neighbor.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC