Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strongest Presidency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:04 PM
Original message
Poll question: Strongest Presidency
Ten slots. Last ten Presidents:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. W
Hands down. He got EVERYTHING he wanted except privatizing SS. The little fascist war criminal will never be brought to justice either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. True, but Johnson's ability to get the civil rights bill passed...
create both medicare and medicaid, initiate many environmental and consumer protections, and initiate the war on poverty were phenomenal accomplishments, given the attitudes in the South. I give LBJ the nod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Sadly, I agree. And it all started with a stolen election. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Didn't get immigration reform either.
But he was battling his own right flank on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Maybe
I'm not sure he really wanted immigration reform. Too much cheap labor. He did end Clinton's successful efforts at prosecuting and punishing employers who employed undocumented workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laf.La.Dem. Donating Member (924 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sad to say - BUT
You did not ask for best President - but strongest President (Sad but I had to vote for Reagan)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Indeed. I did not say best. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. Same here. It was the strongest, in a BAD way. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumgrum Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Strongest: LBJ, Regan, Bush II / Weakest: Carter, Obama, Ford
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 03:13 PM by grumgrum
Although Regan and Bush II shifted america in a wrong direction and its ultimate doom to China by 2025/2050 they were strong in getting their polciies through without backing down.

Granted Obama has been in a mess caused by Bush II but its the obsessive capitulation that perpetuates he policies of the last that makes his presidency weak. If he fought and lost for his principles then i'd have more respect for his presidency...and so he remains one of the weakest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Carter was stronger than people realized. He could've dropped bombs on Iran but he preferred
negotiations and that's what gained them their freedom in the end. It was President Carter who freed the hostages not reagan. He had a different kind of strngth that americans don't apprecoate-strength of character and conviction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. +1 .nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
28. I alike Carter a lot, and despise war
But when Americans are being held hostage like that, something must be done other than lengthy negotiations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't LBJ have over 61 Dems in the Senate at one point...
not to take away anything from him...but it is a hell of a lot easier to get anything you want when you have a filibuster-proof congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. But many of them were Jim Crow Southeners
"Georgia Democrat Richard Russell offered the final arguments in opposition. Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, who had enlisted the Republican votes that made cloture a realistic option, spoke for the proponents with his customary eloquence. Noting that the day marked the 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's nomination to a second term, the Illinois Republican proclaimed, in the words of Victor Hugo, "Stronger than all the armies is an idea whose time has come." He continued, "The time has come for equality of opportunity in sharing in government, in education, and in employment. It will not be stayed or denied. It is here!" "

Senator Byrd(D) of West Virginia made a filibuster effort to prevent passage of the Civil Rights Act.

"At 9:51 on the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert C. Byrd completed an address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier. The subject was the pending Civil Rights Act of 1964, a measure that occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays."

http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/Civil_Rights_Filibuster_Ended.htm

Without the support of the Republicans, the Civil Rights Act would not have passed the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeak Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. More to the point...
He had a better environment of "bi-partisonship" support, in addition to a filibuster-proof congress (on paper). Compared to what Obama is dealing with now, thats like shooting fish in a barrel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nixon

Even with a Democratic congress he reshaped the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. But what he did didn't need approval from Congress
If you are referring to his visiting the USSR and Red China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grumgrum Donating Member (164 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Realistically, Bush II should be ranked higher than Obama -- Obama should be last.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. bush by a mile.
He managed to get a DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED SENATE to approve a war against a country that didn't attack us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
18. You didn't list FDR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Ten slots in polls. So last ten Presidents. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyr330 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Ah, ok. . .
Just wondering! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
19. Can't really judge Obama
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 09:20 PM by bigwillq
in full since it's not over yet, for better or worse.

* edited
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Johnson's was so strong he didn't need to run for a second full term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Obama should be slightly ahead of Carter and Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
24. Andrew Jackson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. Fascinating that Johnson's legacy has warmed considerably
in the last 40 years.

I picked Nixon. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
27. Define "strong".
Intersting poll, but expand on "strong".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC