Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Proposes Payroll-Tax Holiday - For worker earning $40,000, the tax savings would be $800

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:51 PM
Original message
White House Proposes Payroll-Tax Holiday - For worker earning $40,000, the tax savings would be $800
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 05:57 PM by jefferson_dem
White House Proposes Payroll-Tax Holiday
By JONATHAN WEISMAN And JOHN D. MCKINNON

WASHINGTON—Aides to President Barack Obama are proposing a one-year reduction in the payroll tax as part of negotiations with Congress on a broader package to stave off income-tax increases due to take effect next year.

Under the White House plan, the Social Security tax paid by workers would drop temporarily by 2 percentage points, to 4.2% from 6.2%, a person familiar with the proposal said. For a worker earning $40,000, the tax savings would be $800.

The proposal has not won the approval of congressional Democrats or Republicans. Its emergence in the broader tax negotiations is a sign that the White House is trying to break the logjam on those talks before the end of the year, when tax cuts signed into law by former President George W. Bush are due to expire.

White House officials proposed the cut as a way to stimulate the economy, said the person familiar with the talks. The proposal would take the place of an earlier White House push to extend Mr. Obama's signature Making Work Pay tax cut, which reduced income taxes for middle-income individuals by $400 a year.

Republicans had adamantly opposed extending Making Work Pay, and House Democrats were cool to it, as well. But Mr. Obama and Democrats are likely to accept a Republican demand that the Bush-era tax cuts be extended even for wealthy taxpayers, and the White House is looking for more in return for agreeing to extend the cuts for higher earners.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704156304576003441518282986.html?mod=wsj_share_twitter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Savings would be $800, not $8000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'll take $800! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Still, better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oopsie. Thanks.
Fixed now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. $15.38 a week
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 05:56 PM by BeyondGeography
I think Rush Limbaugh will be (privately) more thankful. He saves $2.7 million.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. How is this an attack on Social Security? Robert Reich and others pushed this
many times.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Amazing, A Payroll Tax Holiday Was LAUDED By Liberals, That Is UNTIL Obama Proposes It!
Holy cow, the hate is palpable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Have you reasoned this cut out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Reasoned What Out? A Payroll Tax Was Floated By Liberals As A Great Idea
That is until NOW that Obama is proposing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Reduced FIT taxes--not SS taxes!!!!!!!! One is an entitlement, one is not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. WTF Are You Talking About? Did I Say SS?
I said payroll taxes, which is what the story says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. The plan is for a one year reduction of SS taxes from 6.2 to 4.2 per
cent. Where did you think the money was coming from?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. And Liberals Floated A Payroll Tax Holiday And NOW A Poster Was Slamming Obama For It!
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 06:35 PM by Beetwasher
Seriously, do you even know what the fuck post you're responding to? Where did I say anything other than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. The payroll tax holiday was for FIT--not SS. Why would Democrats
want to begin a defunding of SS in the same year that a deficit commission was picked to partly revamp it. That is simply tactic shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Bullshit, It Was Actually A Total Holiday On All Payroll Taxes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
28. Federal Income Tax is NOT "payroll tax". Different critter.
When they say payroll tax, they are talking FICA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. I didn't think it was a good idea then either.

Slippery Slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Answer me this, then: if Social Security tax witholdings are to be
cut, by whatever amount, where will the funds come from to replenish the social security accounts for the amount of the reduction. Or will Fred, who is now 40, simply have less money in his social security account? This is a backdoor trap. Decrease the funding now, then extend that increase thereby lowering future social security payments. Have you heard anything mentioned as to where the replenishment of the reduced funding will come from. I hope there are a few Democrat accountants looking at this thing. And the timing? The Catfood Commission is now basically defunct, with a slightly unexpected vote. So, suddenly, there is another way to reduce future SS entitlements. Hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. "whatever amount, where will the funds come from to replenish the social security accounts "
They will come from raising the threshold on high income earners.

It works.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Yes, PS, but that is so far an idea, and would have to come from
a Republican Congress. Won't happen... But they may like this proposed reduction. It sets the stage and suggests more than one way to skin a cat. Will they reduce SS payments because of this reduction to people who are retiring next year? What is the future value at 20, 30 years of the reduced amount?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. So, they are claiming SS is in crisis, and what we do is un-fund it?
What the FUCK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sirthomas66 Donating Member (336 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Exactamundo. It not only serves as the entry point to do more
defunding, if the defunding is made permanent it reduces payments to future retirees by the amount of the defunding's future value. I thought something like this would be done as part of the next budget or through legislation. This is a trap for Democrats. Watch carefully what the Republican response to this will be. Also, if it passes and you get a year-end social security statement, compare your new payments to your last statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes let us put SS in a worse position
Plus let's also kick the issue down the road for two years so we can 'debate' taxes again during an election year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
14. Great idea.. so long as it involves the ELIMINATION of the bush tax cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. Do not care. It's only temporary. (nt)
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 07:28 PM by w4rma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
25. For a family earning $50,000 the savings would be $1,000 for those paying maximum, savings of $2,136
Edited on Mon Dec-06-10 08:06 PM by flpoljunkie
Among the provisions in the package sure to get intense scrutiny is the temporary payroll tax cut. Under current law, workers in 2011 would pay 6.2 percent in Social Security payroll tax on income up to $106,800, or a maximum of $6,621.60. For a family earning $50,000, the two percentage point cut would mean a savings of $1,000.

For workers paying the maximum, the two percentage point cut would mean a savings of $2,136.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/us/politics/07cong.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hollowdweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-06-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. Mission Accomplished: First step to permanently defunding SS

Way to go Obama. We all have retirement thru our work anyway right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC