|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:39 PM Original message |
Mike Papantonio: "We wanted Obama to fight the good ol' boy club... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. Same thing happened with the Clintons n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:48 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. Sure does seem like it.. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
2. He'll never be an insider with the GOP good ol' boys club, and I don't think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:44 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. They don't have to extend an invite for the prez to want to belong. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:55 PM Response to Reply #3 |
17. But your OP said "...and maybe now likes being an insider." That's what I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. WANTS to be part of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:47 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Reminds me of country clubs (Pap mentioned those too)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 12:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. let's be real... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Maybe it makes a difference if you come from nothing and then get all you mentioned... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:11 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. you're right!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
14. What a load of shit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. it's deffo part of it. Oh and he also has an army of SS guards. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:29 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. "Deffo"? What kind of word is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GSLevel9 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 03:17 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. uhh, "bling-obsessed rapper type" ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:01 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. It was certainly implied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:04 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The "implication" must've been in your own head. It wasn't in the post. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:11 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Yes, it was. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:16 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. There's no reason to address what's not in the post on this thread... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. No, I was referring to actual posts made here: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Those aren't in this thread. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:37 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. When did I say they were? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:45 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. LOL - you've accused a poster of racism, but try to deflect when... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:49 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Deflect? I pointed you to the exact threads I was talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:50 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Hel-loooo! You accused a poster on THIS thread, but use examples... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:56 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. I used posts from other threads to show a similar mentality to that poster. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. #32 has your number too. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:58 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. And once again, *you* deflect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. Read #23 slowly - maybe you'll get it this time. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Scribe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:51 PM Response to Reply #24 |
32. I just see another lazy accusation of racism |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 04:59 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigdarryl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well to fight he needs the back of the whole party because they didn't have his back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. They responded to his earlier "compromises" - this latest one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:17 PM Response to Original message |
12. He may disagree with the policy options but enough with the simple-minded psychoanalysis already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What makes it "simple-minded?" He's just saying what a lot of people... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
19. a lot of people think the earth is 7000 years old and dinosaurs lived with people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 02:35 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. False equivalency - and silly to boot. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
38. The rewards may come for him and his family AFTER his Presidency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-07-10 05:27 PM Response to Original message |
39. All politicians, eventually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC