Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Statement by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka On Tax Cut Deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:46 PM
Original message
Statement by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka On Tax Cut Deal

Statement by AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka On Tax Cut Deal

December 07, 2010

Two years ago, working Americans had high hopes that we would ultimately emerge from the deep, punishing financial debacle with a sharp focus on a fundamentally stronger, fairer and more balanced economy. Today, that vision has dimmed.

The tax cut deal rewards Republican obstructionism by giving the wealthy the tax breaks they demanded. It throws away precious resources needed for investments in jobs and our economy on upper income tax cuts that will do very little to propel economic growth—setting up excuses for the deficit hypocrites to argue for even more cuts to programs serving working families. It lards the tax cuts for the top 2 percent with an indefensible cut in the estate tax – giving yet another bonus to the super-rich. Taken together, this package locks in the growing income inequality that has plagued our country for at least another two years – and quite possibly much longer.

It is unconscionable that the price of support for struggling middle class families and workers who have been unable to find jobs for months and months and months is yet more giveaways for our country's wealthiest families. Millions of jobless workers have lived in fear for months while Senate Republicans had the gall to use their hardships as political leverage for the benefit of the rich.

The gains for the middle class and jobless workers in the deal come at too high a price.

The issue we face today is not the lack of power or opportunity. The question we have to answer is this: How do we use our power to escape caving in to Wall Street and moneyed interests? And how do we create the millions of jobs we need now and move toward a future of broadly shared prosperity?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Another Democrat not happy with this "deal".
Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lucky 13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cue the union hating.
It's coming... can you feel it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. i can't, but thats mainly because he seems smarter then most of DU
He seems to be looking at the proper culprits in this matter, the republicans and not Obama.

AKA. To me it seems like that he is not to happy with the compromise, but he realizes that the high cost for it came from the republicans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. Trumka's right...it is unconscionable that that was the price
I think we got some good things along with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Exactly correct and I have no personal Union affiliation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. Trumka is correct.
This deal was immoral, and it was made by men who constantly sneer in judgment of others. They are vile people, the Republicans and those who fail to fight them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. So he's opposed to a 13 month extension of unemployment insurance?
Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-07-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I didn't read it as that he was against it as such
My reading of it was that he thinks the cost was way higher then it should have been, and that it was due to the republicans.

Both stances i would agree with him on. The cost was way to high, but the unemployment extension HAD to be done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC