Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pumpkin Pies, Progress, and The Great Disappointment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 06:43 PM
Original message
Pumpkin Pies, Progress, and The Great Disappointment
One of the most important lessons I learned about progressive politics was learned when I tried my hand at baking a pumpkin pie.

I had all of the ingredients lined up, had my pie crust ready, mixed up everything in the mixing bowl, baked it up good, and delivered my pumpkin pie to a local Democratic picnic where I hoped everyone would enjoy it.

The food at the picnic was good, and as I sampled my friends' entrees and desserts, I noticed that my pumpkin pie had gone almost untouched. Since I was in the mood for pie after a good meal, I cut of a slice of my own pie and took a bite. It tasted, well, earthy. This isn't right, I told myself. I've had plenty of pumpkin pies over the years, probably too many, but that's another story. My pie didn't taste nearly as good as any of the other pumpkin pies I've eaten. When I finally came home, I realized why.

There on the kitchen counter was a bag of organic, fair trade cane sugar that was supposed to be used in the creation of my beloved pumpkin pie. Unopened. Patiently waiting for me to do something with it. Boy, I felt like a tool.

But therein lies the lesson: if you're going to cook or bake something to eat, you have to make sure that all of the ingredients are in the mix, or the end product will probably taste less than satisfactory.

And it's the same with progressive politics. There are a lot of factors that go into crafting a new social or political institution that is designed to help as many Americans as possible while advancing personal freedom on one hand and general welfare on the other. It's a delicate balance sometimes, but you have to find that balance or the whole thing is going to blow up in your face - let alone fail to earn the monicker of "progressive."

What President Obama calls "healthcare reform" came up far short of being progressive. It kept the insurance companies firmly in charge of whatever reform processes were instituted, and it also made it illegal not to support these corrupt institutions with our hard-earned paychecks as of 2014. The only thing that could have kept these insurance companies honest - a public health insurance option - died a lingering death on the Senate floor with Obama making no reasonable attempt to preserve it. Without "sugar," the whole deal tasted less than satisfactory. Without that one remaining ingredient, the reform bill was as much of a failure as my pumpkin pie.

Then there was Obama lecturing progressive Democrats at a hastily-called press conference where he announced a deal to abandon his campaign pledge to end the Bush tax cuts for the richest 1-2% of Americans. He cobbled together this deal after conferring with Republicans, but not with Democrats. "Yes, We Can" had somehow morphed into "You'll eat what I serve you, you don't appreciate what I've done for you, and the Republicans are being mean to me so I have to do what they say."

In the end, it doesn't matter if Obama ran for office as a centrist. What matters is whether he is willing to listen to those who put him in the White House. That's what George W. Bush did - Big Business was all too happy that the Supreme Court ruled the "right" way. But Obama wasn't supposed to be the candidate of Big Business. He was supposed to be our President. The People's President. Change you can believe in and all that. Which is all the more tragic that Obama's term in office has turned into The Great Disappointment.

Will Obama take a step back from the podium to listen to his constituents at long last? Or will he continue his quixoitc quest for bipartisanship with politicians who want nothing more than to make Obama their flunkie before handing him his hat in 2012, provided he isn't defeated by a Democratic primary challenger first? Perhaps Obama should stop patting himself on the back long enough to take a long, hard look at the political scoreboard. And the American people, despite Republican victories in November, are clearly expecting Obama to do something - well, progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is not going to change. He is what he is. Some of us just let wishful thinking get in the way
of clear vision. I know that's what happened to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In that case. he will be primaried in 2012...
...and there is a chance that he will lose the primary. Obama needs to wake up. Today, he sounds nothing at all like the man who ran against John McCain back in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Progressives didn't put Obama in the White House, African American and
youth voters did.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I'm not black, and I'm not exactly "young" anymore
And I helped put Obama in office. Ask me anything! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry, but aren't many
Youth and African American voters Progressives? I'd say it took a large number of people from all walks of life to put him in the white house. I'm hardly unbiased here - I am, after all, one of those youth voters. I can now admit to my shame though, and admit that I was taken for a ride. If I had to do it over again, I'd vote for Kucinich as I truly wanted to to begin with. I let others talk me out of it, because, according to them, he had no hope of swaying the masses.

Still, I think it required a great many progressives working together to elect Obama, perhaps youth and African American voters turned out in large, even record numbers, but we could not have done it alone. We weren't the only ones who were fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Besides, if only the youth and African-Americans got the job done...
...there wouldn't be any need to reach out to this old fart white guy, right?

It takes all of us, working together, to effect the change we want to see. And we can't just sit back and assume our man will do the right thing, otherwise he may very well flip-flop like Obama just did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Sadly
I now regret that I reached out to so many to help him. Should I have supported Clinton instead? Or should I have really voted my conscience and gone with Kucinich? My heart is with Kucinich and those like him - but logic tells me that if I vote for a candidate so unpopular and politically weak I will be wasting my vote.

I have no intention of sitting back and assuming - I'm doing what little I can to effect change, but I think that perhaps the most important change in the near future will be in how Americans perceive politics (thus the most important task, for all of us, is to educate). I can't in good conscience continue to vote for the lesser of two evils when this is the end result. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, right?

I'm sorry I I helped convince people to vote for him - I should have campaigned for Kucinich. In the future that is what I intend to do. Now that should be a really good fight, shouldn't it? I think now, more than ever, that that is the right thing to do. I can't after all, effect change by repeating the mistakes of the past. Perhaps a candidate even better than Kucinich will come up. We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. What does your heart tell you?
If you're committed to a particular Democratic candidate, by all means, vote for that candidate during the primaries. During the general election, we can hopefully put aside the "If only this guy..." long enough to vote for our party's candidate and then work to make sure our new Democratic President listens to us once in a while.

I was a Bill Richardson man in 2008. He got eliminated, and some people were advising me to back John Edwards. I appreciated his stand on some issues, but he just didn't set right with me, so I waited to see how this whole Obama/Clinton thing played out. But I must admit that I will always admire Kucinich's passion and drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Along w/ a bunch of progressive bloggers,
527s and bunch of older white folks. He is ignoring ALL the people who voted for him. One thing I do know, he got votes from a very, very small number of rethuglicans. I know not a single rethuglican in my family voted for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I'll wager more progressives than Republicans voted for Obama
Which is all the more reason for Obama to wake the hell up. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well said - love the pumpkin pie analogy! k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks!
And I always remember the sugar whenever I'm in the kitchen now. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I once made sugar cookies and forgot the sugar! lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I can almost top that
Once I walked into a supermarket and saw a batch of "sugar cookies" that were made without sugar - only HFCS. Pays to read that ingredient label, it does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-08-10 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Those lying liars! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC