Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On letting the Bush's tax credits expire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:49 PM
Original message
On letting the Bush's tax credits expire
Why not let them expire?

Why not let the Reps stupid letter of intent (to not discuss anything until the Bush tax issue is resolved) become null and void, because the Bush tax issue would have been resolved/expired

So,Bush's tax cuts expire, it's no longer part of the discussion and we can all move on the 9-11 responder health benefits, DADT, extension of unemployment benefits.

THEN when that's done, THEN why not address Obama's tax cut
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've wondered this myself....
Why are we even debating the Bush tax cuts? Why not just let them expire?

Obama and the Dems don't have to do a damn thing and they'll expire.

Why the fuss?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Perhaps it gives cover for other agendas...
"We had to pass those egregious Bush tax giveaways because of the unemployed!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Republican House will have control of cuts. If any. But Obama breaks
a major campaign promise and raises taxes on the middle class, and Republicans will be cutting your taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Ahhh....but another twist would be
If Obama throws out the Obama Tax Cuts to the next Congress, and THEY decide not to pass it, it's the REPUBLICAN Congress that gets the blame for not passing the cuts....no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Obama can't start legislation. The House originates legislation.
If Republicans want Obama to fail and be a one-termer, why would they help him keep his campaign promise to the middle class after they've taken control of the House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I am procedurally naive....so given your statement
Isn't that something Obama can negotiate with sypathetic House members? That they bring a bill forward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The best that Obama can negotiate, he's just done with this current deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Meany Donating Member (986 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Call their bluff...
See if they are willing to hold the whole government hostage for tax-cuts for billionaires. Expose their priorities: they don't give a damn about the American people or governance--only about further enriching the super-rich so that they will continue to put them in power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's a sad statement you make there.
1-2% of the population that don't get a possible tax break, can hold the entire Republican party hostage. It sure isn't about what's best for the majority of the people, but what's best for the people with the majority of the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SKKY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Of couse they're willing to...
...they've filibustered 9/11 responders care to make sure this happens first. You think they really care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kjackson227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Because to let them expire would mean that up to $3,000 worth...
of taxes will be added to the middle-class on January 1, 2011, which will make the economy worse. Not to mention 2M won't receive UI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You really think the unemployed will
not get an exension if the Bush tax cuts expire?

IMHO Once the link between those two bills is broken, I don't think there is any way UI won't get extended,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. To keep them means wages drop, two years added to recovery
Edited on Thu Dec-09-10 04:08 PM by niceypoo
...and the end of Obama's presidency/legacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #6
24. Over the course of the next
2-3 months, up to 7 million will have lost UI benefits.....I am astonished that so many here seem to have an "oh well" attitude toward that reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. On the contrary, Obama wants to take ownership of them
The Obama/Bush tax cuts for the rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm not convinced this is the entire story
I've statement after statement you have made and I'm sure you have made up your mind.

After reading an article today, there is a lot of convoluted pork barrel issues, I had no idea are in any way related to taxes, being brought to the bargaining table. So the reasons for any final decision is actually more obscure that a general statement that Obama is siding with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Making a deal with the devil is one thing...
...but using it as a platform to publicly attack his own party and those who put him into office is just beyond the pale.

I am facing facts here. I am a liberal, I hold traditional Democratic values dear, and Obama hates them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Okey dokey then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-09-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Did you take Civics? Huh?
I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well said. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frugal99 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akbacchus_BC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. If the current administration allowed the Bush tax cuts to expire, do
you really know how many Americans would be affected in a negative way. Why would you want that? Then come January, everything that the President wanted to pass will not get passed. Well, need I say it, some of you voted for rethugs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. If we do not give everyone a $5000 check immediately
do you know how many people will be worse off than if we did?


Do we really have any reason to believe that somehow passing this deal will suddenly open the floodgates and suddenly the republicans will start voting in favor of everything (or anything) on Obama's agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frugal99 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. KR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC