Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader "Obama a con man needs a primary challenger"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 10:53 AM
Original message
Nader "Obama a con man needs a primary challenger"
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20025168-503544.html?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed

December 9, 2010 12:31 PM
Ralph Nader: Obama is a "Con Man"
Posted by Lucy Madison
Two-time third-party presidential candidate Ralph Nader (Credit: AP)
Ralph Nader, liberal activist and two-time third-party presidential candidate, lambasted President Obama in a Wednesday interview, and called for a liberal alternative to challenge in him in the 2012 presidential campaign.

"He has no fixed principles," Nader said, of Mr. Obama. "He's opportunistic -- he goes for expedience, like Clinton. Some call him temperamentally conflict-averse. If you want to be harsher, you say he has no principles and he's opportunistic."
"He's a con man," Nader continued. "I have no use for him."

Nader urged a progressive candidate to challenge Mr. Obama for the presidency in 2012, and said that while he wasn't altogether disallowing the possibility of running himself, it was time for a new progressive leader to step forward.
"Obama's position has been that the liberal, progressive wing has nowhere to go, therefore they can't turn their back on the administration. But a challenge will hold his feet to the fire and signal that we do have somewhere to go," Nader said.

"I'm not foreclosing the possibility ... There are just other things to do," he continued. "And it's time for someone else to continue. I've done it so many times. When I go around the country, I'm telling people they need to find somebody."
In a Tuesday letter to Mr. Obama, Nader expressed his discontent with the president's decision to compromise with Republicans on tax cuts for America's highest earners - an issue that has inspired a firestorm of criticism from many liberals.



edited to 4 paras ... more at the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYCGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nader is calling someone "opportunistic"? "No fixed principles?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlewolf Donating Member (920 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. so stealing that pot/kettle ... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck Ralph Nader. He isn't a Democrat. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think that's absolutely valid
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 11:02 AM by upi402
A strong opposition party opposing corporatism is the only hope. Americans will not take to the streets.

The Democratic Party left me as it moved toward the Republican side. Nader is a Democrat, I am a Democrat, but the Democratic Party is not behaving like an opposition party against the powerful elites. It's a face-licking lapdog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Agreed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, Ralph, tell us how you really feel about Obama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. That stupid little weasel
Mr. "There's no difference between Bush and Gore" helped get us into this mess by draining a precious 2.74% of the vote in 2000.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Gee. I could have also been a SCOTUS stacked by the repubs.
But hey, never let reality get in the way of your pet theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigdarryl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. if he hadn't taken votes from Gore in Florida in 2000 we wouldn't be in this mess
he's an ASS a rich one in fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. If there's a serious 2012 primary challenge, it would be from the right, not the left.
For the most part, Obama still has the liberal electorate locked up; they support him almost as much as they did in the first year, and they voted in '10 at the same rate they did in '06. His biggest problem at the polls is that moderates have deserted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Wait until the new polls come out - post giant sellout...
He may get back the mushy middle but it won't make up for what he loses.

Sure, some will still vote for the lesser of two evils, but not as many as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Polls have pretty consistently shown that Obama's biggest weakness is among centrists.
His appeal to centrists was a key part of his rise to power in '08. Through shitty messaging he's managed to convince them that: A) He's been a super-liberal, and B) His super-liberal policies haven't worked. I agree that he needs to embrace rather than reject progressivism, but there simply isn't any indication that there's more than Kucinich-level support for a primary challenger on the left. There is, however, plenty of indication that a Conservadem might be able to make some noise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm just saying that what's happening among liberals is a sea-change...
If someone like me - who has been an activist since the Carter years, never missing a vote - for the first time doubts whether a vote for Obama is possible, things have really changed.

As you know, the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing expecting something different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. The blogosphere has been making similar claims since before his inauguration.
It's possible that this time they're correct and that Obama has suddenly lost the left. It's also possible that he hasn't. I suppose we have to wait until new polling data comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. True, and things can change yet again - but I want to be part of a movement...
...away from a corporate Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fuck You, RALPH!
go back to obscurity and STFU.

I will never forgive you for AWOL Bush being crowned king. ASSHOLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MedicalAdmin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. So the SCOTUS had nothing to do with it?
Or do you also blame any factor that could have shifted the vote? Like Katherine Harris and vote caging?

Or do you just hate liberals?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Nader should have never been on the ballot in FL.
he could have pulled out of states where the polls were showing a tie. and there were several states like that.

his ego, fed by big money from republican donors, is why he stayed in. he's an asshole, and as a result, we were stuck WITH THE WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. There were multiple necessary conditions, the lack of any one of which would have meant Pres. Gore.
Nader's insistence on running in FL despite polling showing a close race in is certainly one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. Why are you still talking, Raph? We have you and your ignorant supporters to thank
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 12:20 PM by Phx_Dem
for the Iraq war and every other hideous thing brought to us by George Bush.

Go fuck yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
17. At least he's not calling him an Uncle Tom again. Yet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yeah...take the advice of the enabler who made FL close enough to steal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. Says the man that took Republican money. FUCK HIM.
Nader is what he is, and what he will always remain, a political gadfly with an ego the size of a small planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ahahahaha. And who's gonna do it, Ralph? You?
Take your fucking planet-sized ego that gave us George Bush and SHOVE it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. Step into the breach, Wonder Wizard.
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 01:51 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
27. Who?
Is that the two-time loser who ran for President and got his ass kicked? Bitter much, Ralph?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tweeternik Donating Member (137 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Ralph ... time to take your medicine!
Now take it and shut the fuck up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. Go away Ralphie.
Now you just look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
30. Nader endorsed John Edwards
... enough said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
31. Nader gave Bush 8 years. His words are worth less than W's.
Go ahead, Ralph.
Run again and enlarge the legendary embarrassment that is your political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
32. Nader's the worst con man of all
Comes out once every 4 years acting like he wants to fight the power, then disappears for 3 years and does absolutely nothing. He's a real life urban legend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC