Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anybody recall Obama on TV repeatedly demanding that the GOP accept the public option?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:46 PM
Original message
Does anybody recall Obama on TV repeatedly demanding that the GOP accept the public option?
Does anyone recall his recruiting Bill Clinton to appear in a joint televised appearance to urge the GOP and conservaDems to allow a public option?

Does anyone remember Obama sending Joe Biden over to the Republicans to deliver a "take it or leave it" message on the public option within the HCR bill?

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. nuh-uh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jrthin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. NO. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes!
But then I woke up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echotrail Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. No. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. No. n/t
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 06:05 PM by myrna minx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You have a selective memory
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 06:43 PM by brentspeak
I've been here for years and have posted good things about the Democrats (emphasis) repeatedly -- and have likewise blasted the Republicans repeatedly. I've even posted a few positive things about Obama -- but there hasn't been much to praise him for, besides his public calling-out of the US Chamber of Commerce during the last election cycle, and maybe a couple of other not exactly remarkable things. As it stands, he's essentially pushing forth GOP-type legislation while simultaneously both destroying the Democratic party and harming the nation in the process (mandated, non-cost controlled private health insurance without a public option was a GOP idea; NAFTA-like "free trade" treaty with S.Korea is a GOP goal; acceleration of war in Afghanistan is a GOP-supported idea; current tax deal, including Social Security-trojan horse payroll tax holiday, is almost completely a GOP deal, etc.)

You conflate "Democrats" in general with "Obama" in particular. Obama and his people (the President and his administration) have bashed the House Democrats more than I (a mostly powerless person posting on the Web) have criticized him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
36. Plus one. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. of course not . . . . and because of his lack of energy in that respect,
I can only conclude that the PO was a minor irritant in the plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. the remote control wire from the Health Care lobby didn't reach that far

apparently the GOP has gone wireless

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. yup..he will go to the mat for conservative policy that's for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
13. No ... let's impeach him!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. His new buds will get to that soon enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. Sadly, no. -- nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. He had bigger problems with the dim-witted screaming about death panels and socialism.
The urgency currently has to do with time running out before the end of the year and all kinds of unsettled business: the Dream Act, repeal of DADT, Defense Authorization Bill, and ratifying the START Treaty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
16. Keep in mind, PO was a compromise.
Health care (not necessarily health insurance) for everyone was the goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Not once
I do, however, recall him saying he wouldn't extend the Bush tax cuts for the rich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pistarkle Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yes and he did, BUT...
Edited on Fri Dec-10-10 07:28 PM by Pistarkle
WE criticized the President and Democrats when we didn’t get the public option but WE didn’t fight for it. We let the Tea Party and health insurance industry do ALL of the squawking and we didn’t start raising Cain until AFTER the fact! If we learn anything from this, it should be that if the President wants what we want WE have got fight ALONG with the President to get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. You must be kidding! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pistarkle Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Did you?
Did you write, email, call, fax any GOP legislators FOR the public option? I did. The records will show that the President NEVER campaigned on the term "public option". His campaign message was to "REFORM health care to insure quality, affordable health care for all". The term "public option" popped up in the words of Lawmakers and Tea Partiers during the Health Care Reform debates and we all bought into it. It seemed like a good idea to me at the time, but we can't blame the President for not getting what he didn't promise! He campaigned on Health Care Reform and that's what we got even if it wasn't as much as we wanted. Democratic Presidents have been trying to reform health care since the President Kennedy era and President Obama was the only one to get it to the point of legislation. Like Social Security and Medicare, once it passes legislation, it can be expanded. (If the new Republican majority doesn't wipe it off the slates). If you wanted the public option, you should have fought for it like the Tea Partiers and health insurance industry fought against it - and got what they wanted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
41. You're joking right?
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/HealthCareFullPlan.pdf


He talks about the PUBLIC PLAN in the campaign documents.

"Barack Obama and Joe Biden will ensure that all Americans are empowered to monitor their health by ensuring
coverage of essential clinical services in all federally supported health plans, including Medicare, Medicaid,
SCHIP and the new public plan."

"Quality and efficiency. Participating hospitals and providers that participate in the new public plan will
be required to collect and report data to ensure that standards for health care quality, health information
technology and administration are being met."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. That's what I was thinking.
Kidding, surely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. No he did not EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pistarkle Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Did you?
Did you write, email, call, fax any GOP legislators FOR the public option? I did. The records will show that the President NEVER campaigned on the term "public option". His campaign message was to "REFORM health care to insure quality, affordable health care for all". The term "public option" popped up in the words of Lawmakers and Tea Partiers during the Health Care Reform debates and we all bought into it. It seemed like a good idea to me at the time, but we can't blame the President for not getting what he didn't promise! He campaigned on Health Care Reform and that's what we got even if it wasn't as much as we wanted. Democratic Presidents have been trying to reform health care since the President Kennedy era and President Obama was the only one to get it to the point of legislation. Like Social Security and Medicare, once it passes legislation, it can be expanded. (If the new Republican majority doesn't wipe it off the slates). If you wanted the public option, you should have fought for it like the Tea Partiers and health insurance industry fought against it - and got what they wanted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. The President promised the public option during the campaign.
See link above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. The public option could have passed with only Democratic support if you consider reconciliation
GOP support wasn't necessary and wasn't needed. All of them would have voted against health care reform with or without the public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. The problem is that it didn't have enough Democratic support in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
58. You can only succeed if you try, but you fcan fail without trying. Ask yourself honestly:
Did Obama try as hard to get HCR as he is trying now to get these tax cuts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. never plan on us having it - did back room deals then too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. He only campaigns against his friends, not his enemies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Wouldn't that look kind of dumb?
Why go on TV demanding something that's not happening? Don't you just look dumb for insisting?

Why don't more DUers get on TV and demand everything they want? That'll make Congress vote for it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. They had the votes for the public option.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/83641-sanders-senate-has-the-votes-to-pass-public-option-via-reconciliation

And it had 77% popular support

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/08/20/new-poll-77-percent-suppo_n_264375.html



THe only reason it didn't happen is that the ADMINISTRATION pulled the public option from their plan released the week before the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yes, No, No.
Of course, the GOP would have been happy to "leave it" on HCR, and deliver absolutely nothing, so that's a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
25. nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm pretty sure I wouldn't have forgotten any of those events. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-10-10 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
29. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. Nope, it didn't happen.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
32. Excellent point! K & Fing R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
35. Obama: Public option should be part of reform (9/7/2009)
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 12:30 PM by killbotfactory
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32718713/ns/politics-white_house/

Senate Democrats blocked the public option, the GOP wasn't having any of it. But if they hadn't, and a public option was included in the reforms, do you think Obama would have objected?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. I was out sick that day....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiffenPoof Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:12 PM
Original message
No, I don't recall...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiffenPoof Donating Member (676 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. No, I don't recall...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. No, and on top of the the Media gave very little if only marginal consideration of liberal positions
Including followi-up with interviews of Repukes who have forced a crisis to get tax cuts for the super wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
43. It's sure becoming clear who we're dealing with - question is, what now? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
44. I recall reading that he bargained it away behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
45. Well, there was the State of The Union speech in 2009... if that counts...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Don't confuse the demagogues with facts nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
46. No and he certainly didn't ask an ex president to appear with him to
emphasize the importance of a public option in keeping premium prices down. In fact the mantra here was the president stays out of all congressional legislation and he couldn't under any circumstances insist on certain language in the final bill. Impossible I was told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enogero Donating Member (27 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
47. ouch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
48. So you're saying that the President never promised a public option?
And why is the public option considered the do all and end all of healthcare reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Milo_Bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
50. I remember it CLEARLY!
Edited on Sat Dec-11-10 04:55 PM by Milo_Bloom
It was right on the heals of the 1.5 trillion dollar stimulus package

and just before they passed that energy policy that really worked to tackle climate change.

I am not sure if it came BEFORE or AFTER the lobbyists all left Washington b/c of campaign finance reform.. but definitely before they broke up the "too big to fail" banks.


Yeah.. that's when it happened!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
52. Gosh NO I must have missed it
funny thing though I have on MSNBC all the time yet still some how *missed* it :yoiks: ... either that or he NEVER DID! :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
53. I can't believe I missed that! DAMN YOU BOURBON!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
54. Shiver me timbers...NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
55. No
But since Clinton failed in passing his HCR and theres 0 chance of republicans listening to a democratic VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
56. As A Matter Of Fact, No
Hmmm. Why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
57. Um, he ran his platform against a public option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-11-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
59. fuck no
that would require COURAGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC