Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Speaker Pelosi tweets on DADT repeal: House voted 250-175, time for Senate to act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:57 PM
Original message
Speaker Pelosi tweets on DADT repeal: House voted 250-175, time for Senate to act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well done, Speaker Pelosi!!
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 05:58 PM by bushisanidiot
can John (asshole) McCain still screw things up in the Senate by filibustering against our troops?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If we have 60 votes - no, he can't
We may have them. We had 57 votes and would have had 58 if Blanche Lincoln's dentist would have been faster. That includes Collins. Brown said he wouldn't vote until the tax cuts passed - and they have. He got a ton of grief in MA for that vote and I can't believe he would vote against it again. Snowe apparently has said she will vote for it. There are several possibilities for number 60.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I suspect we'll have 64 or 65 for cloture
58 + Collins, Brown, Murkowski, Lugar, Ensign, and probably Kirk.

Snowe will abstain out of cowardice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. What I'm confused about is how will they know they have the 60 votes
until they vote? will mccain's mic get cut if he tries to stall? and is there usually a penalty for such a thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The leader (Reid) or the floor managers (Lieberman and Collins)
have a vote count - and they call for the cloture vote. There are times that it fails - sometimes it is KNOWN that it will and the intent is to put people on the record. Rarely, it is because someone is not there or someone does not do as they promised. The latter is VERY rare as you lose credibility. (The only time I remember on that is an angry Reid speaking of someone doing that - later identified as the then new Scott Brown.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ok, so mccain could only filibuster if the vote for cloture failed, right?
so that vote is taken before debate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The failing vote itself is a "filibuster"
(Think of it as a virtual filibuster - under the Mr Smith Goes to Washington rules, they need to keep speaking to control the floor. Now, there is a vote (cloture) that determines if debate on the bill can open. They need a second vote (also cloture) to end the debate and move to a vote.

The effect - stopping a bill from progressing is the same - but the process is completely different.

On DADT, there could be the following sequence:

- A cloture vote to bring it to the floor
- If that passes, they can insist on 30 hrs of debate
- A cloture vote to bring it to a vote
- a 30 hr waiting period
- the vote

The first 4 can be waived - and that used to be the norm. That will not happen here - even as they complain that it is close to Christmas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Usually don't read tweets - but that one is pretty sweet! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Speaker tweeted? Damn, I got to get me one of them tweeters.
I had a woofer with my stereo once, but it doesn't work anymore.

LoL

Great news!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R...nt
Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fantastic. And I heard that the votes for repeal are there in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC