Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those who are pissing & moaning about how relentlessly the Left is criticizing President Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:06 PM
Original message
For those who are pissing & moaning about how relentlessly the Left is criticizing President Obama
Did you ever stop to think that if those liberals or "lefties" or "purists" ever stopped ranting and raving, THERE WOULD BE NO PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION....ever?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Considering the apparent fact that the "Caver in Chief" was the one who kept pushing....
.... the health bill even when some on the left deemed it a failure, no, sorry. Not buyin' it.

Sure, we need progressive legislation ... but what we need MORE than progressive legislation is progressive legislation .... that we can PASS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What exactly has HCR accomplished? Let's look at how well it has worked so far ...........
2010 Family Health Premiums Rise 3 Percent to $13,770 in 2010, But Workers' Share Jumps 14 Percent as Firms Shift Cost Burden.

The number of people with health insurance decreased to 253.6 million in 2009 from 255.1 million in 2008. This is the first year that the number of people with health insurance has decreased since 1987, the first year that comparable health insurance data were collected.

he number of people without health insurance rose sharply last year to 50.7 million — an all time high — according to data released Thursday by the Census Bureau.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. No one promised things we be fixed overnight. See me in five years. nt
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 10:22 PM by Clio the Leo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
28. But no one promised that the situation would get worse
I was forced to drop my insurance due to a 26% rise in premiums. I know that's not the fault of HCR, but that's what we get for giving presents to the private sector. They're profiteering while they can, and there's nothing in the legislation to prevent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #28
54. please show where it wouldn't have risen 26% without HCR.
The insurance companies are gouging while they can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. So they can keep gouging until at least 2014, and that is a good
thing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #62
73. Where did anyone say it was a good thing?
duh...but placing the blame where it belongs is generally a good thing rather that projecting a hate message in any and every other direction..duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #54
64. They wouldn't have risen 26% if HCR addressed the core issue, which is
the rising cost of health care. There's nothing in the bill that actually stops insurance companies from gouging people this year, next year, the year after that or ten years down the road.

Sure, it makes insurance more available, but only if you can afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
30. Would have been if HR676 ...
Which the majority of USAmericans supported...

Had been passed...

Last I heard, we're supposed to have "representative government"...

Not government by the lackeys of the Ruling Class...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
49. You mean when President Romney finishes off Social Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #49
65. If he does, it;s only because President Obama gave him the framework in which to do it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smashcut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
60. He kept pushing for a bill that lines private insurers' pockets
with premiums for policies on millions of new customers most of whom won't actually get CARE for their $$$$.

That bill WAS a failure to anyone who cared about actual reform and not just checking an item off the list. I'm glad the courts have struck down the mandate as most people who are uninsured can't afford to be cash cows for the multi-billion-dollar scam known as the health insurance industry in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 10:10 PM by ProSense
"Kill the bill" would also mean "THERE WOULD BE NO PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION....ever"

Fighting and losing versus fighting and winning is the difference 1994 and 2010.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
31. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
displacedvermoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
63. Winning what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Nearly all of Obama's passed legislation is progressive by definition.
So, what you said is complete baloney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Any progressive legislation he passed is directly proportional to the outcries of his base
that he used to relate to, so it is not baloney. sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Huh?

That is over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. also in his base ------>
<---- or here, depending on what the reader is looking at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
75. but I thought Obama only listened to corporations and pissed on the left?
first he ignores 'progressives', now it's the 'progressives' victories.

which is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. all progress, according to them, comes from capitulation to Republicans
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. And North capitulated to the South to from the Union....
.... or should we have not done that either?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. actually, it was bad compromises that *led* to the Civil War...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. So the nation could have been formed without the 3/5ths compromise?
Break that one down for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. actually, it was the refusal to stand up to rightwing racists:
by appeasing them, we got civil war:

http://history-world.org/compromise_of_1850.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. So if they'd just held out, the South would have released their slaves
and joined the union?

Where do people get this idea? Has it worked for them in some personal battle? Was it a stare contest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. If you had any understanding of history---you'd see Progress has been made by BOTH parties.
Most of the time working together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #36
46. Give me your top five bits of Progress from the GOP post
Lincoln. You make a claim in favor of Republicans as agents of progress, please show us your favorite Republican actions. Prove your point. Because I contest your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. of course, without the bloggers there'd be no legislation
oh thank you FDL and Cenk for providing that 13 month UE extension, getting $20 billion from BP, the stimulus bill among all the other blessings. Without your bellyaching we would be 1934 Italy by now.

Give me a break.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. .
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Why are you laughing? It's the Left who hits the streets, protests, criticizes, gets things done
When you stop and think about it, the Left is the catalyst to all progressive change. They are the roots, like it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. "It's the Left who hits the streets, protests, criticizes, gets things done"
It's the left (unions and other groups) who got health care reform passed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #16
32. What's left of the "union movement"
is a shell...

The appeasers passed that piece of shit, NOT the 'left'...

Nice try, though... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
57. And just who do you think "unions and other groups" are?
Sensible moderates? I've yet to see one get active.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. lol, nah, Crazy Eddie was responsible for the BP "shake down" ... DUR!
:fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Who was responsible for BP taking control of the Coast Guard, EPA, and direction over the press?
That is the "shakedown" I'm worried about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. This is for show I guess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #22
33. Shit...one corporation suing another...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
38. It boggles my mind----no understanding. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
68. Exactly, do they take credit for all that?
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. No, they kill progress
They create a situation where Republicans win.

They are either actually Republicans or dupes to the extent they let the Republicans control them. And let the Republicans win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. "they let Republicans control them"
Enough about the Dem leadership, this thread is about the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. +1000
:rofl:

Zingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #29
43. +5000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. You're right. It was bloggers who passed all the legislation of the past two years.
Congress and the President haven't done shit by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. I get kind of tired.....
....of the left giving the right great ideas for campaign ads. Let's hope they're not watching. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Sorry, but "Capitulator-In-Chief", "Caver", "Small and Pathetic", "Weak", "Wimp"
are not words used by people who are there to offer constructive advice. Not everyone is to be thanked for their "contributions".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. so very well said-
:hug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #25
37. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #37
40. I heard he was always a Bush----"Change You CAN'T Believe In..."
Is a very popular catch-phrase here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. Well, there's a reason they're known as
the two right-wings of the Corporate War Party...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Uh huh...by idiots. ^_^ I definitely don't subscribe to the idea Obama is a corporatist. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #44
56. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #25
39. Ain't that the truth. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #25
50. VERY well said, their criticism isn't very..............progressive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
27. you make a good point
I truly believe that each of us has our place in the Progressive movement - be it the "loud left", the "purist left", the "ultra liberals", the "pragmatic Dems", the "professional left", etc.

I agree with you that we need people to the left of Obama to keep pushing, discussing, debating, etc. Absolutely.

However.... I think it becomes counterproductive when the name calling, dismissive attacks, unrealistic positions, etc. come into play. I think we can push the President and elected officials with more progressive opinions, demonstrations, etc. without demonizing them and acting like they are the enemy. Sometimes, we have to at least try to understand the environment within which they are working, and be realistic about what they can achieve.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
35. But...uh...for you guys. There NEVER has been progressive legislation by this administration.
And if the nation is roughly 20% progressive, you're voice is rather a minority. Theodore Roosevelt, was NOT a leftist, however he put forth massively progressive legislation. Eisenhower is another one who's done the same but who's a Republican. Let's be clear---Progressive legislation is not produced or pushed by ONLY the left. It's when your voices are joined by the Center and the Right are there PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. It's only when things get SO bad
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 01:32 AM by ProudDad
so shitty...

So near final collapse...

That the minions of the Ruling Class co-opt tiny pieces of the Progressive agenda...

In order to save the majority of the Status Quo...

Let's be clear about motivation...

Those you mention enacted tiny slivers of Progressive thought in order to save their asses...

In addition, if the USAmerican public is asked the questions about whether they support Progressive values and policies, about 80% would answer in the affirmative...

But USAmerica does not have nor has EVER HAD a truly representative government...nothing approaching a democracy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. I'm not saying that. I'm just saying that
progressive legislation, whether it's during this administration or any previous administration, is directly related to the outcries of the Left to get progressive legislation passed.

As far as any questions for this administration:

Does this administration listen to the Left on the MAJOR progressive issues as much as it should be listening to them?

Does Obama owe it to the Left to fight for them a little harder than he has on those major progressive issues? Would he be President right now if it wasn't for the Left that practically carried him through the Primaries on their shoulders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #45
59. No, I would disagree with this point.
As I stated in other threads...Theodore Roosevelt was a republican, but he pushed majorly progressive initiatives and that's because of a book that wasn't even really pushing any sort of meme--but had the topic as a side topic. I think you're giving the left more credit than they deserve. When it came to widow's fund which was the precursor of medicare---I don't think there was even a real distinct left and right. And I'd have to say most of the widows who received funding probably came from what we would call the "right" today.

Be clear with your statements. I do believe that socially progressive ideologies are forefronts for the left---however it's not limited to them and many on the right have some progressive views. I knew a Libertarian who would make some on the left look tame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #59
69. No problem, and your points are well taken
I do believe that socially progressive ideologies are forefronts for the left---however it's not limited to them and many on the right have some progressive views.


Well said. My post does make it sound like I'm giving exclusive bragging rights to the Left as far as being responsible for all progressive legislation. Maybe I should have said "there would be almost no progressive legislation" instead of "there would be no progressive legislation." Just the same, I stand by my belief that if it wasn't for the rantings and persistence of the Left, then we wouldn't get to experience nearly the same amount of progressive legislation that we enjoy today. I think the Left deserves more credit when it comes to that than any other ideological group.

Theodore Roosevelt was a republican, but he pushed majorly progressive initiatives and that's because of a book that wasn't even really pushing any sort of meme--but had the topic as a side topic.


Yup, he was a Republican. If he was alive today, I am almost certain he would hate Republicans because of their horrible performance when it comes to the environment. Teddy Roosevelt just happens to be my favorite president. That's because the most important things to me, politically, are the environment, wildlife, and conservation of them. As far as past presidents go, I feel that Teddy Roosevelt was the finest steward of the environment that this country has ever seen.

Thank you for your contribution to this thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #69
72. Yeah....Teddy is my man...for all of the above and the fact he was a New Yorker!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. Who is 'you guys'? Yesterday you posted that you are a
Progressive. Today, you state that 'you progressives' are a minority. Buttering that toast on both sides, you are going to get greasy fingers. When you address an individual as 'you guys' you need to clarify. Yesterday, you were a Progressive, today, Progressives are 'you guys'.
I stand with the underdogs, kiddo. I stand with my own community. The President says we are not 'sanctified' enough for his taste, whatever the fuck that nonsense means. Sanctified, as a legal term? Whatever it takes to sell that soap. to prevent equality for all. Such a noble goal to have, really, preventing others from pursuing happiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #47
58. What are you talking about? You didn't read the title of the this thread---LEFT.
I said I was not of the left, but I am a progressive. Progressives is a huge umbrella and distinct from the Left. Since the left is more so an ideology. In any event, I did :rofl: when you attempted to put me in my place. I make distinct and clear differences. The thread said Left and I responded to the people who claim they are of the "left". You seem to be confusing the two points, which I made clear in several of my posts can be mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
48. Pissing and moaning is one thing, tearing down with rude, teaparty comments is different.
The obscene language, and racist dogwhistles are what most are complaining about. Dissent, disagreement, and complaints is not what is so offensive. The vitriol, and hate that you can find
on Free Republic is what most disdain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. AMEN!!!! If we wanted misguided and sophisty we'd go to hannity.com et al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
52. I could not care less about your "criticism", because it has nothing to do with reality.
It's a waste of energy to be pissed at you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheepshank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
53. Did you ever stop to think
Edited on Fri Dec-17-10 11:12 AM by Sheepshank
how it all plays to the RW talking meme? That you think that progress is only made via pissing and moaning is incorrect and patently false. All the pissing and moaning on these bb's does nothing byut affect voter apathy and discontent. You want to acheive something? Pissing and moaning on a bb is not it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
55. look who's pissing and moaning...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
66. No, because that is not true
There would be even more of it if the left has even a little bit of discipline and was capable of the slightest give and take.

The left here would have been against the New Deal since it did not go far enough.

In fact, you are showing a belief that negative energy is the only thing that works. Sort of like the stereotypical view of the military, where it is assumed you will be lazy until the sergeant taunts you and calls you names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
74. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. Nope, mine are the economic structure, energy policy, and infrastructure investment.
Along with civil liberties.

My fight is with the power structure and those who profit from it.

I congratulate Leadership, the President, and even the weasel Lieberman on DADT.

I now expect the President to stop enforcing this bullshit and stop loss anyone that gets caught up in the transition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-18-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
78. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC