Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Michael Vick did to dogs is bad enough

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:41 PM
Original message
What Michael Vick did to dogs is bad enough
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 08:42 PM by mtnsnake
but what Republicans have done in recent years to wild animals in this country is a million times worse, simply because of the scale of their atrocities.

President Clinton did many fine things for the environment during his two terms, putting a stop to much of the damage done by Reagan and Poppy Bush. Then the War Criminal Bush took over in 2000 and did his very best to allow the environment and our wild animals to be pillaged as much as possible. Only the efforts of Democrats such as Kerry saved our environment from going completely down the tubes under Bush, although Bush ended up doing some serious damage anyway.

President Obama then took over and reversed many of Bush's horrific environmental policies, doing some excellent things to once again protect what's left of our environment and our wildlife.

My point is that while he did a dumb thing in choosing Vick, the dog torturer, to be a poster boy for prisoners who deserve a second chance, Obama has done a great deal of good on behalf of wild animals in the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Michael Vick is boring, but
what does Vick, prisoners and the President's call have to do with environmental policy?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Obama called the owner of the Eagles to congratulate him for the green new
Edited on Tue Dec-28-10 08:55 PM by lunatica
stadium that was built. That was the reason for the call. Unfortunately in the DU explosion that fact has been buried for the most part.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/11/19/philadelphia-eagles-going-self-sufficient-on-stadium-energy-from/


Philadelphia Eagles going self-sufficient on stadium energy from 2011, 30 percent of it renewable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks,
still no connection to Vick and prisoners. Interesting about the stadium, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. In the course of the conversation
Obama said that although he condemns the actions of Vick with the dogs he wanted to thank the owner of the Eagles for hiring an ex-convict and giving him a second chance and that he hoped more businessmen would do the same. That was it. Obama didn't talk to Vick or praise him.

Obviously the crimes Vick committed are ones that will always be highly charged emotionally. We've seen that today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safetykitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. This was well planned. Obama was needed by the NFL. He is quite pliable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Needed? In what way?
Are you saying the NFL needs Obama in order to continue? Sorry, but hardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Let me guess. Tax payers funded the stadium to be built and will fund this scam as well
Enough with throwing away taxpayer money to build stadiums for rich sociopaths to play in.

Make Lurie pay for all that shit out of his own pocket. Quit soaking taxpayers, ya dog killer lovin'douchebag!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Why does it bother you so much that I can like both Obama & the Clintons?
Does that answer your question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. yes, but do you like both Obama, the Clintons, and...
Brewer and Shipley?

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. There is no reason not to give Bush and vick a second chance.
However you also have to give all the people in prisons across the states a second chance.

It is not a caring attempt to give someone a second chance, if it is only some friend in your group. That is two tiered justice.


The concept of 'second chance' and mercy is maligned and disrespected when given to some and not others for reasons other then compassion justice and mercy.

And I am thankful for mercy and grace also, and also that I can think that way about people some things try to get me to hate, but I not about to think it applies to some group more then some other. That is a claim that has nothing to do with mercy or compassion but about the self, although I understand how it is done.


It is the comment of the death penalty. If someone were to hurt your family would you then promote the death penalty, by going after the person doing it?

In the same way what if your family member was looking at a death sentence, would you help them more then a stranger?


In the first case you would hope someone would help you not be vengeful and that through justice it could be taken care of with proper compassion, the attachment close to you that they hurt would make it hard for you to do proper justice.

In the second example, you should hope someone prosecutes great wrong that you can not prosecute by your caring for that individual as a fellow family member.


And if all people are your brothers and sisters, then vengeance belongs to the Lord.

Although I also think it best for people to try to have a just and compassionate system as best they can, treating the poor and the rich, or connected with same justice, not targeted justice, and also thinking on mitigating effects with concept of education and mercy. To avoid vengeance also, since most readings of angry passages I have read are not about God being upset about people being less zealous to him, but about inequity of how the poor are treated.

Then again, they think life is all there is, so do not see any vengeance occur correctly, and then think that means their actions are correct. Maybe so, maybe not, but that is for a open transparent court to decide, which it has not done yet.

It is not that hard to understand.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bush has never faced his crimes... At least Vick faced justice...
So, yes... that is very hard to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I wouldn't give Bush a second chance even if he somehow served 5 life sentences for his war crimes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Well since Bush should get life for his crimes there are no second chances there
To get anything less than life would be a travesty of justice when millions are maimed and dead because he had to have his wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-28-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. If only Bush had a conscience, then he'd be serving a life sentence outside of jail
but he has no conscience or soul. If only there was a way to have him incarcerated in a Turkish jail just like the one Billy Hayes from Midnight Express was in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-30-10 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. "That is two tiered justice"...
which is exactly what this country has. I have a friend who spent a few years in the pen for selling marijuana. Vick spent a couple years for torturing and killing dogs. My friend is an now an ex-con who is not an athletic talent. Michael Vick is both. If you are a normal ex-con, you have a very hard time finding a good job- EVER. Vick's crime was much worse, yet he is worshipped every Sunday. If the Eagles go to the Super Bowl, it will be the first one I haven't watched in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-10 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
15. Go Obama...
thanking someone for giving an ex-con a second chance...rehabilitation....is a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC