Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reality Check for all liberals:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:05 PM
Original message
Reality Check for all liberals:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. The media has everything to do with it.
They've done a good job destroying the liberal brand, and continuously endorse a defective product.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. You can't blame it on all the media. We might try and look in the mirror sometime. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. I don't blame individuals in the media; but I DO blame their owners; and I blame
Dem pols for doing nothing to preserve independent media in this country (i.e., allowing the rollback of restrictions on the consolidation of media ownership into the hands of just a few megacorps, all of whom have conflicts of interest with objective news reporting).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 04:39 AM
Response to Reply #19
41. We, as in you and I, don't have to.
"We" as in dumbasses who believe that shipping jobs overseas, stagnating wages, "Horatio Alger", wasting tax dollars to pick fights with sovereign nations and publicly-traded corporations running every aspect of life is great for America . . . well, yeah, for sure.

Ultimately, no one holds a gun to someone's head when they're choosing to put a bad piece of work like John Kasich in Ohio's governor's office, for example. But how do we get people more involved in the understanding of how state and national economies work before making such a bad decision in the first place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
48. check your sigline. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. True!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
duhneece Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Concise, practical
Truthfully, I get too emotional at times and I appreciate your acknowledging our political 'climate' with no accusations, no over-emotional outburst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Kevin Drum from Mother Jones wrote the center piece. Here is a link, did not intend to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I don't trust Gallup's numbers. Why should Drum?
The fact is that when asked about specific issues, the American people are overwhelmingly progressive in their positions. Ideological self-identification is less important than issue-specific responses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capn Sunshine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
53. Drum is pretty good at this journalism thingie, wouldn't you say?
It would seem the numbers are acceptable to him for purposes of that article. And he KNOWS people who verify survey info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. But if that is indeed correct, then how did we get liberal majorities for 2 years?
Edited on Fri Dec-31-10 06:22 PM by Go2Peace
I would argue because for a long political season the Progressive message neutered Republican messaging and we saw that when the population has two messages well proclaimed that at least 50% of the population identifies with the progressive message, even if they may be too confused by the assault on language to identify their preference as such.

It's too bad we did not keep up that kind of message momentum. You can see that we are not simply by reading this OP. They are back and winning through propaganda.

Fortunately, we do have a fledgling message industry, and while it cannot reach as large an audience or as forcefully, that "20%" is gaining their voice and building momentum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
47. probably because the mishandling of Katrina was so obvious that
the "liberally-biased media" couldn't ignore it without looking like totally bought-out buffoon(s) ...

However, once it was figured out which Democratic candidate was actually going to be the lightning rod for all the world's ills, then the full-scale media attack (called "slobbering love affair") could commence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's all about labels. "Self-IDs." Check the population on the issues and...
...you'll see we're progressive nation. Read Ruy Texiera's "The Emerging Democratic Majority."

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tony_FLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. 40% of Americans consider themselves conservative because of 2 issues: abortion and Balancing the
budget.


If liberals addressed these 2 issues they would benefit politically and still maintain their liberal principles.

Address the abortion issue by dealing with the actual cause of abortion which is economics and make tough decisions that relate to spending that balance the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Economics is not the main issue with abortion, it is about education which fundies object too.
The right wing does not want their children to receive sex ed in school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tony_FLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. According to the survey below, 73% of women have abortions for economic reasons
www.str.org/site/DocServer/Abortion-FactsandFigures-v06.pdf?docID=2429


I have seen other surveys with similiar results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
56. But they want them to have religious eduction in school. From someone else!
They argue about it all the time. When I ask which denomination's teaching should be taught, they get a blank look. Of course, they each think their denomination's teachings are the ones that should be taught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They label themselves conservative because liberal is perjorative term...
made so intentionally by right wing propagandists. When you poll issues individually America is a liberal country.

"Fact: A Gallup poll conducted on June 11, 2007 found that 51% of Americans consider themselves to be pro-choice, whereas just 43% stated they were pro-life. Pres. Bush's appointments to the Supreme Court have already resulted in the restriction of rights to abortion and promise to open the floodgates to challenges to Roe v. Wade. This judicial activism is directly opposed to the wishes of the majority of Americans who, while they support some restrictions on late term procedures, overwhelming oppose the repeal or Roe v. Wade. Of course, the 2000 Presidential election proved that the Supreme Court cares not for the will of the majority of Americans."

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/294530/are_most_americans_really_conservative.html?cat=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Kinda hard to balance the budget while providing the social safety net that would reduce abortion
I know there are people who are uncomfortable with abortion who are well-intentioned and would embrace what you're saying. However, the anti-choice movement is another matter entirely. It is not, and never has been about "life" for them. When they think no one is listening they speak openly about controlling women's sexuality and about going after contraception next. When Roe v Wade is overturned the next item on their agenda is Griswold v Connecticut. The latter case provided the framework for the privacy argument used in Roe.

Any and every compromise with anti-choicers brings them one step closer to their ultimate goal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tony_FLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I think the American People would support increased spending to support a safety net if it were
articulated as a way to reduce abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekohr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. Clinton Balanced 5 budgets which is 5 X as many balanced budgets as the last 5 Republican Presidents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't talk about labels, talk about issues.
When the GOP can claim to be "conservative" by supporting the tax cut extension that blows the deficit sky-high, and by opposing HCR that saves the fed govt $200 billion over the next 10 yrs, then labels are meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. Or including torture as a 'family value'
Labeling doesn't mean shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. If you actually talk to people, that label doesn't mean much.
People like to consider themselves conservative because of what they think the word means, but often without really knowing what it actually means in a political context.

For years I ran a small department in a small research firm doing surveys and polling. We continually called people with every changing surveys and questions to gauge people's political believes and compared their beliefs to their stated party affiliation.

One thing that was always true was that most people had no idea what their parties really did or really stood for. Most "conservatives" wanted more money spent on schools as long as they knew for sure that the money would really be spent to improve education. Most of them also agreed with buying land to expand the public parks and protected preserves and wetlands, and knew the importance of clean air and water. Most of them knew that regulations were necessary in order to ensure honesty in any large organization that accepted public money. The more information you gave people the more people would give nuanced answers, but supportive ones, instead of negative ones.

Over and over again we found that "conservatives" tended to agree with a lot of the same things as liberals if you phrased the question so that they understood the question and the issue in enough detail. The disagreements were in the details, not in the absolutes.

But if all you give people is the talking point that they heard on TV and demand an instant answer then people respond the way they have been programmed to respond. Thinking and nuance shuts down. If you give them a slogan, they respond predictably, and often against their best interests and against what they stated they believed.

I am not surprised that a poll finds a lot of conservatives. "Conservative" is always an attractive brand, especially in some parts of the country. But that is all it is; a brand.

But if you do any investigation to find out what is behind that brand, and what people know about it, and believe, it is never that simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. People might like to call themselves "conservative"
But they really don't buy into what has come to be known as "conservative" policies.

Ask some of your "conservative" friends if they would like to see Social Security and Medicare abolished.

The labelling of every issue as "liberal" vs. "conservative" has been cleverly manipulated by the right wing and their toadies in the media to the point where even intelligent people fall into the trap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. and the democratic party inc has gone along with the dissing of liberal all the way nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. It is "cool" to say you are conservative and liberal has been made
into "immoral".

People will say they are conservative to be socially
accepted and not even know what Conservatism stands
for.

The Republicans on the Hill are MUCH MORE CONSERVATIVE
than their constituents. People will do well to keep
this in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felix_numinous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
13. What data is being referenced?
I am having a hard time believing polls lately, they are too easy to manipulate, like electronic voting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Gallup polling - traditionally biased toward the GOP and the Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Polls collect the opinions of the elderly
So a bunch of old cranky people who sit around all day watching FOX news identify themselves as conservative. Who cares. Few under the age of 45 have a land line or answer a number they don't recognize. Polls are an outdated method for gathering information. Not that internet polls are any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
20. The best poll of last year was the one which showed that most
Americans have no idea what any of the common political labels actually mean, nor which apply to themselves. So the 'self ID' concept is in and of itself problematic, enough so to preclude using such polling in any serious decision making process. Self ID is always skewed. To the point of absurdity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. This could be true, but it still does not negate the fact that the Republican base votes repub no
matter what, unlike liberals. We do not vote as a monolith to accomplish the common goal. Sometimes we vote with a Nader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. I once met a woman while canvassing who considered herself conservative
Because she was for conservation of the environment. She told me she was voting for Bush (it was 2004) because he was going to do more to help the poor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. First tell us where you get the numbers from.
Next tell us how these numbers break down on speciffic issues and then I'll show you how liberals can get things done. Nobody is 100% conservative on anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pholus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
24. Harry Truman has a thought for you...

"If you give the people a choice between a watered-down Republican and a Republican, they will choose the real thing every time."

So keep up the calls for moving to the center!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
25. Your statistics were accurate. But, I don't accept your political
advice as the best road to travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
26. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Wrong! It is a matter of labeling...when asked about specifics...
Amricans lean left--

Abramowitz, author of The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy, crunches data from the Gallup News Service Governance Poll, conducted 9/13-16, and explains:

...While Americans often support conservative principles in the abstract, large majorities of Americans continue to support an active role for government in addressing a wide variety of societal needs and problems.

It is perhaps more surprising, given Americans' endorsement of broad conservative principles, that 76 percent of Gallup's respondents felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "protecting consumers from unsafe products" or that 66 percent felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "protecting the environment from human actions that can harm it." And it is perhaps even more surprising that 67 percent felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "preventing discrimination," that 57 percent felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "making sure all Americans have adequate healthcare," that 52 percent felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "making sure all who want jobs have them," or that 45 percent felt that government should have major or total responsibility for "providing a minimum standard of living for all Americans" (versus only 33 percent who felt that government should have little or no responsibility in this area.)

http://www.thedemocraticstrategist.org/strategist/2010/12/tds_contributor_alan_abramowit.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. I really think the labels are too restrictive.
I am a social liberal and fiscal conservative. I bet you would find everyone claiming to be a fiscal conservative, but are they? What you believe important to spend money upon, I may disagree with entirely and we could easily see each other as spend thrifts with the tax dollars.

Labels just don't work anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
29. Rush Limbaugh & the Right Wing have done their best to make the word "liberal" a bad word
Unfortunately, rightwing hate radio has succeeded because they outnumber us on the airwaves by at least 10 to 1. Someday, maybe Democrats will learn how to give payback and make the word "conservative" a filthy word as well and start off by funding more liberal radio shows than what we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. This is the result of the power of Republican messaging propaganda
When you destroy and distort words you limit the ability of people to express their ideas. There has been such an assault on words associated with liberal that even though the public may still have many "liberal" ethics or political ideas, they no longer identify them as such.

That is one of the problems we have to come to grip with. We are in an age of incredibly powerful mind altering science being used to manipulate the masses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kermitt Gribble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
32. Reality Check??
"You can argue all day long about what people really mean when they tell pollsters they're conservative" - that's why we're moving to the right as a country. The vast majority have no idea what it means to be liberal or conservative these days - partly due to the media, partly due to lying politicians, and partly due to sheer ignorance - all by design to enable a right wing agenda.

The real determining factor is where people stand on the issues. Majorities are on the Liberal side of issues like national healthcare, civil rights, less corporate wellfare, Social Security, worker's rights, etc. Explain the massive public support for a public option or Medicare-for-all, yet the people in DC claim that this isn't the right time. The right time for who? They certainly aren't talking about the American People. This OP is just more excuses for a conservative Democratic administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
33. I have said this many times!
But it seems folks want to think otherwise! Just look at how many Americans think America is god's fav country & that says it all!

Many also refuse to admit the influence Rupert Murdoch has on this country's media as well!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
34. It is the word "liberal" that is in disrepute.
There are a lot more progressives/liberals than the 20% who are willing to be labeled a "liberal."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Progressive is the new liberal
Progressive became popular when the republicans made 'liberal' a bad work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. The term "liberal" has been so vigorously and systematically stigmatized that this means little
People forget what was at the heart of "1984": the concept of newspeak and its ability, by destroying language, to destroy the feelings described by it. It has been a linguistic hate-fest of epic proportions for the last more than half a century to deride, denigrate and vilify the word "liberal" that people run from it from mere sense-memory alone.

That's why so many prefer the label "progressive", and why so many of us call those people out as being weak in the face of an onslaught.

It's also a bit of an imbalanced dichotomy, anyway: I would say that a "liberal" is a bit farther from the center than a "conservative", and even though this is all very imperfect and subjective, I'll bet this plays into the results cited.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. When the DLC scum claimed to be "liberals"...when Joe Lieberman
was held to have had the "most liberal voting record"
in the Senate....

THAT'S when I started to identify as a "Progressive".

I am happy that the Progressive Caucus is now larger
than the Blue Dogs and the "Liberal" New Dems put together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-10 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. It has a lot to do
with the fact that the leaders of both parties, along with the MSM, bought into Reragan's free trade free market supply-side trickle down theories, including Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. How would the people know that there is an alternative? We thought we might be electing an alternative in 2008, but only because he concealed who he really was. It's amazing there are still 20% who held out against the propaganda.

It was always interesting to watch Democrats be seduced by Reagan's economic theories, while watching the empire expand and the debt pile up. Couldn't see the rot taking place behind the facade. And still don't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
38. To quote Winston Smith...
"Sanity is not statistical".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cutatious Donating Member (95 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
39. It's time for some compassionate Liberalism
High intelligent spending and low taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
42. When Dukasis ran for prez he let the name "Liberal" be sullied, disrespected
and degraded without a single defense. Ever since then it's been open season on "liberals". Now we have the Obama adminstration doing the same thing. It's no wonder people run from it when even "liberals" cast liberals being at fault for everything. :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
51. +10000000 to the power of infinity!
I agree with every word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
43. My core convictions do not drift with the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-01-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
45. That 20% is at least half of the Democratic party
I am curious what the question they asked was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
52. Exactly there is years of work ahead, but people msut at all costs stay in the game.
Edited on Mon Jan-03-11 07:05 PM by ProgressOnTheMove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-03-11 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
55. When asked a direct question
the majority (large majority in most cases) respond exactly the way any liberal would (i.e. Health Care/Single Payer, increased Taxes for the wealthy, our out of control defense spending, etc. etc. etc.)

BUT

when couched as something like 'do you agree with the Liberal, or Socialist idea of...' the 'pukes and our mass media have made those words radioactive, and the answer turns out then: "No".

So kindly take your "reality check" and... aw fuggeddaboudit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC