Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Plumline: House liberals urge Obama to draw hard line: "Hands off Social Security!"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:32 PM
Original message
The Plumline: House liberals urge Obama to draw hard line: "Hands off Social Security!"


By Greg Sargent

In a letter delivered to the White House moments ago, top House liberals urged President Obama to use his State of the Union speech to draw a sharp line on the popular program for seniors that has helped define the Democratic Party for decades, by delivering Republicans a blunt message: "Hands off Social Security!"

The letter, which was sent over by a source, represents the clearest shot across the bow yet from House Dems on Social Security, and suggests that the left is gearing up for a big fight in the event that Obama signals openness to cuts to the program, as some expect him to do.

In the letter, Congressional Progressive Caucus co-chairs Raul Grijalva and Keith Ellison argue that Obama has a unique opportunity to frame the issue by positioning himself as the keeper of the "promise of Social Security." They ask him to place himself in opposition to "radical" Republicans who are hell-bent on dismantling the program, and request a meeting to discuss how Obama and Dems will handle the issue in the 112th Congress:

You have a unique opportunity to set forth a framework of democratic values and to call for protecting Social Security for generations to come. Social Security is a promise to every American: If you pay into the system, you earn the right to guaranteed benefits during your retirement. As members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, we stand with you and urge you to reaffirm your support for guaranteed Social Security for America's seniors.

As you know, Congressional Republicans have long targeted Social Security for privatizatin. They have invented a Social Security "crisis" myth to promote their radical schemes to dismantle the cornerstone of retirement security for millions of Americans...

The promise of Social Security is one that we must keep. We urge you to send a clear message in your State of the Union Address: Hands off our Social Security!


This call from liberals, of course, carries echoes of the public option debate, where House progressives repeatedly urged Obama to draw a sharp line on the provision, only to ultimately be ignored. And House Dems are of course in the minority now, weakening them further. But the letter is a sign that the left is going to kick up a huge amount of noise if Obama flirts with any deal that would cut Social Security, which could set back efforts by the White House to repair the rift with House progressives over the tax deal, as the White House appears to want to do.

By Greg Sargent | January 21, 2011; 3:03 PM ET
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. yeah
I got accused of being a 'Veruca Salt Democrat' for wanting single payer or a public option for poor people. The irony was painful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Only 33 of the 75 Progressive Caucus members signed the Social Security letter to Obama.
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 04:42 PM by madfloridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. 33? Really? 33 U.S. Members of Congress are concerned enough that SS faces a threat...
...that they would sign a public letter to the Prez?

What do those dummies know anyway? :sarcasm:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the letter
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 05:00 PM by ProSense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thanks, ProSense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liskddksil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. yep just another "pony" that someone apparently wants
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 05:00 PM by liskddksil
woops - I meant to post this under displacedvermoter's comment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here's the 33 who signed the letter. 42 did not sign it. Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Don't know, but find it interesting that Barney Frank signed the letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. The more important question: 33 did sign it. Why?
Because they're Obama haters?

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-21-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. I still don't understand why Obama isn't coming out forcefully against SS cuts
Edited on Fri Jan-21-11 05:09 PM by Cali_Democrat
I'm not saying he going to cut SS, but there are so many reports out there right now about how he's considering cuts to SS. Are these reports true? Maybe, maybe not.

If they are false, why doesn't Obama just end all speculation ASAP?

It looks like he tried to float a trial balloon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC