Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 2011 SOTU: A Report Card (Not a Very Good Grade)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:15 PM
Original message
The 2011 SOTU: A Report Card (Not a Very Good Grade)


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/leo-hindery-jr/the-2011-sotu-a-report-ca_b_816798.html

Leo Hindery, Jr.
Chairman, U.S. Economy/Smart Globalization Initiative at the New America Foundation
Posted: February 1, 2011 12:30 PM

snip

The reality, however, is that when Barack Obama gave his first report to Congress in February 2009, a SOTU of sorts albeit not an official one, the number of real unemployed American workers was 25.8 million. Twelve months later, in January 2010, when he gave his first official SOTU, the number of unemployed American's had skyrocketed to 30.2 million. And today, in January 2011, the number of unemployed Americans is still 29.6 million. In other words, we have 3.8 million more unemployed Americans today than on Inauguration Day, and only 600,000 fewer than at the end of last year. And at least 10 million of our unemployed have been out of work for a half year or longer.

snip

The Korea Free Trade Agreement (or FTA) is one of the strangest administration fixations since NAFTA under Clinton, and how it was decided that the President would devote so much of his SOTU to it is worth a blog or two of its own. Paul Krugman is emphatic that this FTA will not create jobs. Obviously, the President disagrees.

But while the President 'over dwelled' on Korea trade, he virtually ignored our abysmal trade relations with China, wherein fully 90% of the cost advantage between a product manufactured in China and its counterpart in the U.S. arises from other than cheap labor. American manufacturers, and in turn American workers, are being swamped every day by a combination of illegal subsidies -- e.g., undervalued currency, grants, low-interest loans and free land -- and environmental abuses (and thus advantages). Paul Krugman wrote in a recent column that countervailing duties on Chinese exports which attacked these illegal actions would be "job-creating". Obviously, the President preferred to ignore this fact in his most important speech of the year.

snip

In wrapping all of this up, it is increasingly apparent that "Obamanomics", which is now two years old, is just a synthesis of Clinton-Rubin-Summers neoliberalism: namely, we can let "old" industries go and concentrate instead on the professional jobs of the future and the "green collar economy". In his July 14, 2010 speech announcing his Graduation Initiative, President Obama outlined precisely his neoliberal understanding -- or misunderstanding -- of the economy and economic history. And so it's no surprise that on the eve of SOTU 2011 he would name General Electric CEO Jeff Immelt to head the new Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, a move intended to show the country that the President is really serious about dealing with the nation's economic woes through the free market system.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Lack of Progress lies squarely on the shoulders of the GOPer Party of NO
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 09:24 PM by opihimoimoi
sAME OLE SHIT... the GOPers wanna denigrate blame insinuate destroy others to bring the discussions down to their low level...

This is not a way to make yourselves look good...

Psyops can only work for so long.....

The GOPers are whore mongers.....evil.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The blame lies with both the GOP and the corporate Democrats
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 09:29 PM by brentspeak
It's no one else's fault Obama is pursuing GOP-approved trade and tax policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. But despite the obnoxious GOPers game plan....he has done remarkedly well..
The Dinos will soon be filtered out via elections....

Obama is Chess Master....pubs can only lick their chops and wait.

The GOP Plan is all BAD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interesting
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 09:35 PM by ProSense
The reality, however, is that when Barack Obama gave his first report to Congress in February 2009, a SOTU of sorts albeit not an official one, the number of real unemployed American workers was 25.8 million. Twelve months later, in January 2010, when he gave his first official SOTU, the number of unemployed American's had skyrocketed to 30.2 million. And today, in January 2011, the number of unemployed Americans is still 29.6 million. In other words, we have 3.8 million more unemployed Americans today than on Inauguration Day, and only 600,000 fewer than at the end of last year. And at least 10 million of our unemployed have been out of work for a half year or longer.


Considering that 3.4 million of the 3.8 million happened in the first six months of the administration, that's one way to state 1.1 million jobs created as a 600,000 more over the last year.

Still, it's always interesting when the critique of a speech becomes a laundry list of what wasn't said and everything from China's economy to price gouging. Everyone has an opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Obamanomics"?
Hmmm anybody who uses words like that to try to twist the minds of people ought to just go lay down.

Unrec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Reaganomics, Clintonomics, Obamanomics...
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 09:47 PM by brentspeak
The author provided a long list of facts to support his piece; you provided a bogus and inept criticism to deflect.

Author wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, he loses.
And adding your list of omics proves he's just another self appointed know it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Feel free to respond to an OP when you're willing to provide a reasoned response
Edited on Fri Feb-04-11 09:57 PM by brentspeak
rather than employing the equivalent of throwing poo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I feel free to respond when I want to.
And reading poo articles usually gets a response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Leo Hindery - CFR member
Why is his opinion important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. At least two of Obama's closest advisors -- William Daley and Gene Sperling -- are CFR members
Though Hindery is probably the lone CFR member who doesn't subscribe to the corporate "free trade" B.S.

Why does Obama consider Daley and Sperling's opinions important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm sure they weren't hired due to their memberships
Once again, why is Hindery's 10 days later opinion important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. How do you know their memberships were not reason for hire?
I'm sure I'm the smartest man in America. See how easy it is to type 'sure'? You just discounted one man's opinon on the basis of his being CFR and then discounted that CFR membership matters in others. Like chasing one's own tail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I didn't dismiss his opinion
I asked why it was important. Daley and Sperling worked for Clinton so it's no real surprise they would sign on for the next Democratic President. Who is Hindery that makes his opinion worth noting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 03:22 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Who are you, you are making your opinion known.
In my view, any American has standing to make their opinion known. First Amendment and all. Who do you think a person has to be to speak their mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. So he's noone worth noting?
Basically a Krauthammer of the left? Who am I? A person with an opinion, just like you. If someone makes an OP of my opinion, I expect the same, questioning what makes my opinion worth noting above all others. On economic matters, though I may not always like what Klein or Krugman has to say, their words carry more weight than some random blogger, or some talking head in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Lets' spend some time discussing Obama's opposition to equal
rights for minorities he claims God sees as inferior, how's that? He says only straight people are 'sanctified by God'. What do you think such a term means in a civil context? How can he and his supporters prove that they hold special sanctity, I am not going to simply believe they are God's choice on their own word. Got any theories about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. "Obama's opposition to equal rights for minorities he claims God sees as inferior, how's that? "
Can you provide a link to the President making that claim?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
18. Mr. Hindery just might be a bit bitter about being passed over by the Obama administration...
Some interesting "background":

... Leo Hindery, whose InterMedia Partners employed the former Senate majority leader, had been mentioned as a possible secretary of commerce or U.S. trade representative.

"Tom was pushing for him," said one Democratic source.

Obama's aides rejected Daschle's suggestion that a top job go to Hindery, for whose private equity fund Daschle had served as a rainmaker and adviser. ...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/18336.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Ah, that lovely context. Makes a world of difference, thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-05-11 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Character assassination is no substitute for a substansive rebuttal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-06-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Explaining the guy's possible motivation for grievance against Obama does not...
amount to character assassination. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC