Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you deny your constituents the law's benefits, the feds will implement the law for you.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 05:24 PM
Original message
If you deny your constituents the law's benefits, the feds will implement the law for you.
Edited on Tue Feb-08-11 05:26 PM by babylonsister
Health Care Showdown: Obama Administration Calls Out GOP Governors
Sam Stein
First Posted: 02/ 7/11 06:30 PM Updated: 02/ 7/11 07:57 PM


WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is showing political tough love with Republican governors who criticized both the constitutionality and funding of the president's signature health care legislation.

On Monday, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called out GOP leaders who were bemoaning the law -- and threatening to ignore its provisions -- while still taking the funds needed for implementation. Adding a bit of intrigue to the matter, Gibbs hinted that the White House would address some of the top Republican critics during an upcoming conference of governors later this month.

"{T}]he implementation of this important law is moving forward," said the departing spokesman. "I don't know that we have had specific outreach {to Republican governors}. I know the governor's association is in town later this month, but our policy has and continues to be that implementation moves forward."

In private, heath care policy operatives say, the administration's message has been even more direct. As Republican governors back lawsuits against the legislation, and threaten to return money budgeted for it, the president's team has let it be known that, absent state action, the onus lies on the federal government to implement the law.

"For a lot of things there is a federal backstop," explained one administration official. "States have the first crack at it, for the lack of a better phrase, and states are empowered to take the lead on things, that's what we wanted ... But at the same time we aren't going to allow someone not to get important consumer protections just because he has the misfortune of living in a state that doesn't like the law."

The threat of federal intervention is more motivating than any other card the administration has or can play, and it is felt most acutely with respect to the state-based exchanges, which are required to be operational by 2014.


more...


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/07/obama-gop-governors-health-care_n_819926.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Similar to the Federal Voting Rights act of 1965
If state and local elections officials persist in disenfranchising minority voters, the feds will shove them all aside and federal bureaucrats, yes that's right federal bureaucrats will administer state and local elections in Southern states, right down to manning the local precincts and registering voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Another slam at the South.
States that the Voting Rights Act applies to outside the South: Alaska, Arizona, California, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, and South Dakota. in those states if state and local elections officials persist in disenfranchising minority voters, the feds will shove them all aside and federal bureaucrats, yes that's right federal bureaucrats will administer state and local elections, right down to manning the local precincts and registering voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good.
:thumbsup:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. We can always bring troops back from Iraq and Afghanistan to enforce the law
I think this could be a win-win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC