Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama and the GOP: United Against the Working Poor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:13 PM
Original message
Obama and the GOP: United Against the Working Poor
<snip>

Who says bipartisanship is dead?

On Capitol Hill, the Democrats and Republicans may no longer play cards and drink together, but that does not seem to stop them from working together to shift tax burdens down the income ladder even when it violates their promises on the campaign trail.

Grover Norquist calls bipartisanship the political equivalent of date rape. But there is one group that President Obama, many congressional Democrats, and all congressional Republicans ganged up on in December -- the working poor.

The tax compromise passed in December has been hailed everywhere as a payroll tax cut combined with an extension of the Bush tax cuts, despite the fact that it raised taxes on a third of Americans. The killing of Obama's Making Work Pay tax credit, which the White House called the biggest middle-income tax cut ever, and the replacement of it with the Republicans' payroll tax cut raised taxes on single workers whose wages come to $20,000 or less and married couples with less than $40,000 in wages.

That's 51 million taxpayers, the Tax Policy Center estimated.

Amazingly, the people who raised taxes and supported raising taxes on the poor insist they are universal tax cutters.

Last September, Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl of Arizona said his party's senators had gathered to discuss taxes and that "every Republican was absolutely supportive of the idea that there shouldn't be any increases in taxes."

A week later Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said, "No one should pay higher income taxes next year."

McConnell spoke as he introduced a bill that extended the Bush tax cuts, but not Obama's. Yet not one reporter asked McConnell about why he was seeking to raise taxes on the working poor. Of course, if the working poor are considered "no one," then what McConnell said makes sense, especially for a man who inherited his wealth, which his disclosure statements put at between $7.1 million and $32.8 million.





http://tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/UBEN-8E3J74?OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I didn't realize McConnell had that kind of loot. He should buy himself a chin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Can we all agree that quintessentially this is the stuff from which banana republics
are born and flourish? :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. The irony of this article
"The killing of Obama's Making Work Pay tax credit, which the White House called the biggest middle-income tax cut ever"

First, how is he united against the poor when he created the Making Work Pay credit for two years?

Also, is this article in a time warp?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Because that tax credit is no more
and people like me making little money are now paying more in income tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC