|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-19-11 11:10 PM Original message |
There is no difference between the tea party movement, and the 1967 campaign of George Wallace |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-19-11 11:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. Or a bit more recent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-19-11 11:20 PM Response to Original message |
2. Sure there is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JoePhilly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 10:24 AM Response to Reply #2 |
8. Or Fox news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-19-11 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. Not much, anyway. Largely the same demographics. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 10:55 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. It sure appear so. I don't know why I didn't recognize it. Another difference is that the MSM seem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 11:42 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Absolutely true. MSM treated Wallace like a pariah. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-19-11 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yes it is. Wallace could just say what he wanted but teabaggers have to hide their prejudice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 12:27 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. That is the difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alp227 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 03:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. not this teabagger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
polichick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-20-11 07:39 AM Response to Original message |
7. Was Wallace funded by the Koch brothers too? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC