Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Romney: I’d Like To Repeal Wall Street Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 11:30 AM
Original message
Romney: I’d Like To Repeal Wall Street Reform

Romney: I’d Like To Repeal Wall Street Reform

By Tanya Somanader

With the constant stream of Wall Street donations flowing into his campaign coffers, it was only a matter of time before GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney called to repeal Wall Street’s number one enemy — the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law. Though Congress enacted the law to provide vital consumer protections and to prevent Wall Street from spurring another financial crisis, Republicans have continually attempted to cripple the law piecemeal, either by attacking the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau or weakening derivatives regulation. But Romney decided yesterday that a repeal of the law was necessary because, in part, the law’s length is too “overwhelming”:

“The extent of regulation in the banking industry has become extraordinarily burdensome following Dodd-Frank,” Romney told a roundtable of 18 businessmen at The Common Man Restaurant.

“I’d like to repeal Dodd Frank, recognizing that some revisions make sense,” Romney said. <...>

(H)e said, the 2,000 pages of the bill are “overwhelming” for community banks and the fact that pages of rules must still be written creates too much uncertainty.

Of course, the fact that Romney has finally read some of the law is a step in the right direction. Just last month, he couldn’t name any specifics of the law, saying only, “It’s 2,000 pages. I’m sure there’s something in there that’s good.” Now, he finds that the law’s regulation of derivatives and policy “to have different capital requirements if someone is holding a home mortgage compared to someone holding high-risk securities” actually “does make sense.”

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. He didn't say "cumbersome"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another GOPer who sounds just like POTUS
Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Owlet Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who cares what Roney thinks.
President Perry has yet to be heard from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. Repeal first, then drag out the vagaries and ambiguities about revision
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. This alone should give Obama the win if he ends up facing Romney...
I mean or the Reptilians just conceding this election. Everything they put up would be just laughing stock except for the fact that we have to fear the number of ignorant voters who vote on things other than facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gholtron Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. I agree but it's sad that many here
Don't remember that the President signed that into law. They think he in with Wall St. They don't remember saving GM and Chrysler. They say he don't care about the middle class. It's sickening to see the President being bashed so badly here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. I see Mitt is courting the "firebagger" vote...
Edited on Thu Aug-25-11 05:05 PM by jefferson_dem
Sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. I see Romney is showing the difference between another Obama term,
and a Republican term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC