Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does "Washington" Give A Damn About The Jobless?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 01:52 PM
Original message
Poll question: Does "Washington" Give A Damn About The Jobless?
Edited on Thu Aug-25-11 01:53 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
Where's the SUPER COMMITTEE to deal with the jobless problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good question about the super committee
If they cared I think we'd know by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. This Is A "Fine" Time To Dismantle The Safety Net, Don't You Think?
I am watching my country being turned into, say, Argentina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. +1
With the unemployment rate remaining high, it keeps wages low.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. of course!
they keep CEOs that shoulda been fired for failure happily secure in their jobs with bonuses and pentions! how dare you suggest such a thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
4. Only their votes in the elections. (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. As Washington Goes So Does the Whitehouse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not unless they're jobless bankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, and especially the Beltway Media...if they were 1/4 as concern about Wall Street, then
there would be entire Channels dedicated to the well being of the American working class.

From wages to health benefits, these take a back seat to Wall Street numbers and power plays over stupid political rhetoric.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. how much can jobless people contribute to campaigns?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. The jobless aren't really good lobbyists.
They should have people who represent them...oh..wait a second...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. LOL...two people voted yes
Looks like some folks just emerged from their caves after a multi-year slumber.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The question is nonsensical, so both answers are valid. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxman15 Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-25-11 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. As a whole, not even close.
There are exceptions, of course. But, the vast majority are more concerned about elections than getting things done for the greater good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. No one cares about the unemployed.
Not Washington & not private industry.

There's no easy answer to joblessness, so the jobless are ignored by everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
15. They only care about the poor (and the rest of us) when they are trolling for votes.
Otherwise, they only care about Wall St. and the rest of the wealthy donors that helped them achieve power. One hand washes the other and both major parties are the same in this respect.

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. No, the jobless aren't rich enough to buy politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
17. Here's some information on what Obama is likely to propose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-26-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. They only care about keeping their jobs (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. I Think POTUS Cares
don't hit me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. no
I think that both parties have pretty much accepted the idea of a two tier economy - one for the rich and one for the poor. there doesn't seem to be any desire for government to be involved in legislating anything that would provide an equitable distribution of wealth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-27-11 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. No. The Unemployed/Underemployed are "Worthless Eaters:"
Sucking at the Government Teat. :thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Agar Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-28-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
23. No.
With a few noble exceptions, not including the White House, they only care about holding on to their positions and/or lining their pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC