Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The myth of a small-business tax hike

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 12:49 PM
Original message
The myth of a small-business tax hike
Not surprisingly, Republicans aren’t pleased with Senate Democrats proposing a 5.6% surtax on millionaires and billionaires. But that’s no excuse to lie.

Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.), for example, insisted, “There are a lot of so-called millionaires who are small businesses. They’re not a movie star, they’re not a Hollywood actor, they’re the dry cleaner on the corner.”

This is standard GOP rhetoric — we couldn’t possibly ask the very wealthy to pay a little more in taxes, because those poor small businesses with seven- and eight-figure incomes would be unduly harmed.

Republicans say this all the time, but repetition does not improve its accuracy. Kevin Drum helped set the record straight a couple of weeks ago.

Step 1: The biggest part of Obama’s plan is to let the Bush tax cuts for the rich expire. The Brookings Tax Policy Center took a look at this last year and estimated that only 1.9% of small businesses are in the two top brackets that would be affected by repeal of the Bush tax cuts. That’s a little better than the dozen small farms affected by the estate tax, but not by much.

Step 2: About half of that 1.9% aren’t really small business owners at all. They’re high-income investors who get part of their income from investments in small businesses. So we’re down to about 1% of small businesses that would be affected.

full: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_10/the_myth_of_a_smallbusiness_ta032649.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. So we’re down to about 1% of small businesses that would be affected.
And that means, of course, that the rest are part of the 99%.

Funny how that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If a guy owns a dry cleaner's business, he's a small businessman and
he is NOT making a million a year.

If a guy owns a chain of 26 dry cleaners across the state, he is NOT a small businessman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. remember the Rep. from La. who owns small business
and was whining on MSNBC about ? (Rep. John Fleming owns several Subway sandwich shops and manages UPS Stores in his district, I think.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. 5.6% on an INCOME of 1 million
is more than the median family income in the U.S. So I say fuck 'em. These bleeders are keeping more than 20x the median family income and they have the unmitigated gall to fucking complain? Seriously. Fuck. Them.

I know everybody here already knows this, but sometimes I just have to say it out loud. Or type it. Jesus these people are unbelievable.

(Wait...is my math right?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That 5.6% surtax is only on the taxable income above $1 million.
Everything below that amount is taxed at regular rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackintheGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I stand by my assertation
though I thank you for the clarification. Tax it all. These pricks can live comfortably on $650,000 post-tax income but not on $594,000?

"But Marge, what about our annual Christmas is Vale?!?!"

(Wait...did I just date myself?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I agree... and why should they complain considering
they won't have to pay all those fees that everyone else will because they don't have the minimum money in their bank for fees to be waived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC