Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Business groups whine: leave millionaires alone (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 10:39 AM
Original message
Business groups whine: leave millionaires alone (updated)
Edited on Sat Oct-08-11 10:46 AM by ProSense

Business groups blast proposed surtax

By Bernie Becker

A coalition including top business groups is urging lawmakers to oppose the millionaire’s surtax that Senate Democrats are proposing to pay for President Obama’s jobs package.

The Tax Relief Coalition – which includes, among others, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Federation of Independent Business – said the proposed surtax, combined with other possible tax changes, would give millionaires a punitive tax bill.

“In sum, the Senate legislation would pay for the president’s jobs bill by raising tax rates on hundreds of thousands of business owners, a job killing tax hike to pay for a bill purported to strive for job creation,” the coalition wrote in a Friday letter to senators. The Democrats’ proposed 5.6 percent surtax would go into effect in 2013, with the Bush-era tax rates also set to expire at the end of next year. Those rates were all extended last year in the tax-cut compromise, but Obama has vowed not to extend them again for the highest earners.

The coalition letter also declares that the health care overhaul will bring new taxes in 2013, meaning millionaires would face almost an 50 percent rate if the surtax was implemented and the Bush tax cuts went away.

more


Updated to add: How Obama’s tax hikes would really impact the rich, in three easy charts

<...>

Under Clinton, the top 1 percent paid 33.4 percent; under Bush it paid 29.8 percent; and under Obama it would go back up to 35.3 percent, less than two points than under Clinton.

Meanwhile, under Clinton, the top 0.1 percent paid 36.9 percent; under Bush it paid 32.8 percent; and under Obama it would go back up to 39.7 percent. By contrast, every other group would be paying lower rates under Obama’s proposals than under Clinton. (A table detailing these numbers is right here.)

<...>


Here's a table with the after-tax incomes.

Charts also posted here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sure thing. Alone. On an island in the Bikini atoll. Naked. With no supplies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. No other comments? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. a K&R from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Harry Reid needs to keep his Senate Democrats
on a tight leash, the country needs this tax on big business, enough of selling the people
and the party out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Reid
"the country needs this tax on big business, enough of selling the people "

...should include all the President's provisions and the surtax.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. With no consumer demand because of the banksters actions... there is
no way increased competition or lower taxes would increase demand. The business owners have killed the home goose who layed the golden egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-09-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's interesting
to watch these clowns move the goal post. They railed against ending the tax cuts for those earning $250,000 or more.

Now they're claiming that people earning $1 million or more are small business owners.

Democrats should respond: So?

It's not about their occupation, it's about their income.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC