Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama goes to war against brutal Christian theocrat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:46 AM
Original message
Obama goes to war against brutal Christian theocrat
{'m just waiting for some RWer to take Kony's side, because he's a Christian. It will be a very revealing thing.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2011/10/obama-sends-100-us-troops-to-uganda-to-combat-lords-resistance-army/

Two days ago President Obama authorized the deployment to Uganda of approximately 100 combat-equipped U.S. forces to help regional forces “remove from the battlefield” – meaning capture or kill – Lord’s Resistance Army leader Joseph Kony and senior leaders of the LRA.

The forces will deploy beginning with a small group and grow over the next month to 100. They will ultimately go to Uganda, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with the permission of those countries.
The president made this announcement in a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, Friday afternoon, saying that “deploying these U.S. Armed Forces furthers U.S. national security interests and foreign policy and will be a significant contribution toward counter-LRA efforts in central Africa.”

He said that “although the U.S. forces are combat-equipped, they will only be providing information, advice, and assistance to partner nation forces, and they will not themselves engage LRA forces unless necessary for self-defense.”

The president said that for more than two decades the LRA has been responsible for having “murdered, raped, and kidnapped tens of thousands of men, women, and children in central Africa” and continues to “commit atrocities across the Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and South Sudan that have a disproportionate impact on regional security.”

(...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mactime Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Any country left
Any country left in the world without US 'boots on the ground"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aristus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, the U.S.
They're all someplace else...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Bhutan for starters...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
UnseenUndergrad Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Rightwingers?
I'm wating for some HERE to take Kony's side. So far, none have; besides making the usual noises about the Ugandan's abysmal LGBT rights record, insinuating it's about oil or claiming a Vietnam redux, it's been rather quiet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Do we take the Taliban's side when we say we need to leave Afghanistan?
Hell, the way things are, I'd be surprised if Kony hasn't been getting money and guns from us. If he hasn't, he's probably the first armed person we've gone after in 20 years that doesn't fall into that category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnseenUndergrad Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Apologies.
On the first point, it's very likely that the Taliban's main lifeline is draping itself in the robe of resistance to the continuing western presence. When we get out of there, there may be a brief flurry of resurgence, but then what? So no, we are not cheering the Taliban. it was a poor allegory to conflate non-interventionists with actual supporters of a brutal bunch of idiots.

On my part, it's mostly my own blowback from listening to apparent Qaddafi apologists on the Libya threads (not the strict anti-interventionists, but actual people who sound like near-Stalinists) talking about how Libyans had the "Highest Standard of Living in Africa" under Qaddafi while not considering that said standard may actually rise across the board if the wealth isn't being passed out to the AU and various rebellions or being squandered on the opulence they found in Tripoli (and recently in Sirte).

As to Kony, I wouldn't know the LRA's funding sources (or whether they got by through raiding, slave labor and blood-resources). But unless the Ugandans or DRC government were Soviet aligned (I think they might have been), I can't see a reasonable reason for anyone to foment Chaos like that in the region when most agendas would be in favor of oppressive stability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Well, it's only been a day so far... (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC