Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Hands GOP Victory In Jobs Bill Shadow Boxing Match

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:06 AM
Original message
White House Hands GOP Victory In Jobs Bill Shadow Boxing Match
Republicans just won a round of jousting over President Obama’s jobs bill.

President Obama supports passage of House GOP legislation that would eliminate a tax compliance rule affecting big government contractors and pay for it by limiting Medicaid eligibility, the White House announced Tuesday.

You can read about the legislation — contained in two separate bills — here. Republicans crafted the legislation by pairing two conservative measures the White House proposed as part of their jobs and deficit reduction proposals. That in effect boxed Democrats in, despite its questionable implications for economic growth, and a pay-for that scales back Medicaid, instead of increasing taxes on wealthy Americans.

The administration announced its support in terse statements of official policy, which makes it more likely that Democrats will back it in the Senate. That would give the GOP cover to claim they’re working productively and seeking common ground to pass elements of President Obama’s jobs bill.

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/white-house-hand-gop-victory-in-jobs-bill-shadow-boxing-match.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. He really works hard to give those bastards
all the political cover he can.:wtf: K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is serious and it's from Talking Points Memo...hardly an Anti-Obama site...
It's serious and disturbing. Why would he do this? What does it mean going forward for our party?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't think the 99% are currently represented by a party.
Our choices are "The party that hates us and wants us to die" or "The party that half-heartedly represents us and thinks it's a great idea to endlessly compromise with the other party"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. How does such a measure create jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. That TPM report
jumped the gun. This is Boehner trying to create the impression that they're willing to work with the President by repackaging his proposals.

TPM: House GOPers Were For Withholding Biz Tax Before They Were Against It

<...>

The Cantor tweet and subsequent Boehner release also are a bit puzzling because President Obama has long made clear his support for getting rid of the 3 percent withholding tax, and turns out, Republicans were the first to try to impose the tax burden on government contractors in May 2006, although it’s been delayed ever since by both the 2009 Stimulus Act and the IRS.

In May of that 2006, 229 House Republicans, including GOP leaders John Boehner (R-OH) and Eric Cantor (R-VA), voted to implement the withholding tax on government contractors, as well as Medicare and farm payments, as a way to ensure that some tax-cheat contractors paid their fair share.

The provision was included in the conference report of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, which passed by margin of 244 to 185 despite http://majorityleader.gov/floor/weekly.html">strong opposition by the Associated Builders and Contractors.

That bill extended about $70 billion in tax cuts over a five-year period, including reduced tax rates on capital gains and dividends through 2010 and a patch for the alternative minimum tax, but the 3 percent withholding tax on government contractors was also tucked into the final version of the bill with Republican support.

<...>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. We posted this at the same time :
but you are much faster :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. OTOH, and also from TPM
http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/house-gopers-backed-withholding-biz-tax-before-they-opposed-it.php?ref=fpb House GOPers Were For Withholding Biz Tax Before They Were Against It

It's a tax that was enacted by a R controlled House under Bush.


While a good baby step, the White House said GOP leaders need to do far more to create jobs immediately.

“If Republicans think passing the smallest part of the American Jobs Act is a get-out-of-jail-free card to do something real on jobs they are 100 percent wrong,” a White House official told TPM. “As the President has said from the beginning, our response is simple: where’s the rest?”

The Cantor tweet and subsequent Boehner release also are a bit puzzling because President Obama has long made clear his support for getting rid of the 3 percent withholding tax, and turns out, Republicans were the first to try to impose the tax burden on government contractors in May 2006, although it’s been delayed ever since by both the 2009 Stimulus Act and the IRS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. The GOPers will spin anything at this point...in the end, they will lose their asses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. And the professional left are more than willing to assist them. At last we have bi-partisanship,
Both groups hate this president, and both groups are well funded to do so. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Me thinks The GOPers are desperately try to stave off a complete Rout nx year
Edited on Wed Oct-26-11 11:45 AM by opihimoimoi
Indications of a landslide exist....

The AARP Group is pissed at the GOP

They gonna be the FORCE to wipe the floor with GOPers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Touche.
With a little help from Grover Norquist and the Cato Institute, the PL raises a lot of..."concern".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
12. First time since OWS began that Obama has violated OWS principles. I do not support this
There is no need to do this now. There is a grass roots movement supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-26-11 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Eliminate a rule originally enacted in 2006 when GOP held White House and both bodies of Congress.
Subject should have read:

White House Laughs at 2011 GOP Victory Over 2006 GOP In Jobs Bill Shadow Boxing Match


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC