Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Asserts He’s The Decider on Keystone XL Pipeline, Cites Risk to Drinking Water, Public Health

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 10:28 AM
Original message
Obama Asserts He’s The Decider on Keystone XL Pipeline, Cites Risk to Drinking Water, Public Health

Obama Asserts He’s The Decider on Keystone XL Pipeline, Cites Risk to Drinking Water, Public Health

By Joe Romm

<...>

Today, in an interview with Omaha station KETV (video here), Obama (aka The Decider) walked that back entirely:

The State Department’s in charge of analyzing this, because there’s a pipeline coming in from Canada. They’ll be giving me a report over the next several months, and, you know, my general attitude is, what is best for the American people? What’s best for our economy both short term and long term? But also, what’s best for the health of the American people? Because we don’t want for examples aquifers, they’re adversely affected, folks in Nebraska obviously would be directly impacted, and so we want to make sure we’re taking the long view on these issues.

We need to encourage domestic oil and natural gas production. We need to make sure that we have energy security and aren’t just relying on Middle East sources. But there’s a way of doing that and still making sure that the health and safety of the American people and folks in Nebraska are protected, and that’s how I’ll be measuring these recommendations when they come to me.

Well, the long view is that dirty fossil fuels, like the tar sands, are not merely an unsustainable source of jobs, but they are essentially fatal to efforts to protect the health and well-being of Americans (see James Hansen slams Keystone XL Canada-U.S. Pipeline: “Exploitation of tar sands would make it implausible to stabilize climate and avoid disastrous global climate impacts”).

The reporter asked Obama about “the potential for jobs, does that play into the equation at all?” The President answered:

It does, but I think folks in Nebraska like all across the country aren’t going to say to themselves, “We’ll take a few thousand jobs if it means that our kids are potentially drinking water that would damage their health or rich land that’s so important to agriculture in Nebraska are being adversely affected” because those create jobs, and you know when somebody gets sick that’s a cost that the society has to bear as well. So these are all things that you have to take a look at when you make these decisions.

This certainly sounds like the president is giving himself rhetorical room to delay the decision (to do a better environmental impact statement or examine alternative routes) or kill the pipeline outright.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. This dirty oil is more harmful than the pipeline
I really can't see how this (or any) pipeline over land could do any serious environmental harm, since in the event of leak, you turn the tap to the off position and fix it.

What is known to be very harmful, however, is the dirty tar sands oil itself, which requires huge carbon emissions just to extract and refine it into a useable product.

Because of this, dirty tar sands oil should be developed, if at all, right after we burn the last barrel of conventional oil.

That's really what Obama ought to be telling Canada's oil industry-bought federal government.

And if Canada's conservative Prime Minister (who hates Obama, incidentally) decides to ship Canada's dirty oil to China because the U.S won't buy it, then so be it.

Eventually, Canada and whoever buys our dirty oil will have to cover the cost of related carbon emissions, which if Obama is smart, won't be the U.S.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. K & R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. But wait.... I thought he already
approved it. Didn't we have to endure daily threads from outragers mad at Obama for approving it. Even saw people saying it was the last straw

Of course if he doesn't approve it, the same outragers will rail about how he's fucking things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Thank you Ms. Pro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, duh.
Plenty of people were going after the State Department, but it is obvious that the final decision is going to come from the WH.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-02-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bookmarked!
:patriot:



You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
Solidarity99!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC