Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can a segment of the population truly be equal if their faces can't be viewed in public?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:46 PM
Original message
Can a segment of the population truly be equal if their faces can't be viewed in public?
Serious question: Males try to imagine if you were required to cover your face in public or your gender couldn't be shown in public. Can you achieve true equality?

???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember my last time in Afghanistan...
The girls get more and more covered the older they get.

Little babies wear regular clothes, young girls progress to the head wrap, young teens get the full sleeves and a head wrap and then they finally "graduate" to the full coverage.

We knew a girl who's family was getting her ready for her wedding and I was thinking that this was the last time I'll see her face. Saw her wandering around afterwards in the full garb.

Real shame... pretty girl too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. No and honestly
Everytime I see a women in full cover up garb, I think that husband is an ass. In the end that is why the women have to wear that, because their husband force them too. They may claim that its part of their religion, but it would have never become part of the religion, if the men had not wanted complete control over their women. This is coming from a 23 year old male btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hillary was subjected to the ultimate burkha -- complete invisibility.
Or perhaps that should be "nonexistence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. +1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftynyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. That you would compare the two
is typical for around here. How did what the stupid Hassids did hurt Hillary in any way shape or form? The OP is asking about millions of women who are FORCED to cover their faces in public and of course, someone here has to make an absurd comparison because it makes progressives "uncomfortable" to have an opinion on stupid religious rules (but only Islam causes problems, feel free to bash Christianity or Judaism).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I really try to bash all stupid religious rules even-handedly.
Sorry if I slipped up somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have a visceral, angry reaction to the hiding of women anywhere.
Edited on Mon May-09-11 08:01 PM by Demoiselle
Hair coverings, long robes, I'm fine with it. . But If a person's face is totally hidden, we have no idea at all of her mood, personality. thoughts, awareness, age, experience. In other words, not a hint of her unique humanity. All we know is that she has a vagina. If that isn't the ultimate dehumanizing sexual labelling, I don't know what is. My answer to your question is HELL NO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Agreed. It's obscene in it's own way.
Reducing a woman to only her sex turns her more into a sexual object.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. It's a form of social death. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. I had never thought of it like this before.
Thanks for the thoughtful perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. The face and facial expression are critical to the very nature of humanity.
It may sicken me, but it ultimately doesn't surprise me that cultures demanding women cover their face end up being treated as something less than completely human.

Knowing that I don't know how people can accept or advocate for that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. I once dined in a Seattle restaurant seated near a group of women in
burquas and their husbands. The husbands were all in western dress and sat at the opposite end of the restaurant from their wives and children, who sat together. When the men were finished, they simply got up and left. The women noticed and hurried out after them. Several of the women hadn't finished eating, but it made no difference. The gender inequality was painful to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Warm California day - man in shorts, 2 women in burqas. He strolls toward store door, hands in
pockets. When he reaches door, the women scurry to open it for him. He never takes hands from pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I suppose the women are conditioned to accept their status, but from
the outside, it's tough to watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. No, but I've never met a muslim woman forced to cover their face in the US. All those I've met
Edited on Mon May-09-11 08:08 PM by readmoreoften
choose to do so of their own accord and I support them in their religious freedoms. Now if a woman is forced to do so, I'd oppose this, but I'm not going to assume she is. I don't really like the hysteria about the hijab in the US because it's generally a cover for liberalized anti-Muslim sentiment. Moreover, most women wear scarves, not niqabs (face coverings) or burqas. I have one student who wears a niqab on religious holidays and a regular hijab many other days, but sometimes she wears no hijab at all.

In short: women both in the US and abroad have bigger problems than headgear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. Who told you that? The Easter Bunny or Santa Claus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. Full burqa or niqab is not religious. It's cultural and can and should be challenged for our culture
imho.

Hijab is something completely different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatsonT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. If it is required by law
or by threat of violence, no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. The first time I ever saw women in full burqa was in London
Edited on Mon May-09-11 08:53 PM by Lydia Leftcoast
during the heat wave of 2006.

So the women are covered from head to toe, with just a slit for their eyes. Meanwhile, the men with them are wearing short-sleeved cotton shirts and Bermudas. In other words, the men get to be comfortable and the women don't.

The reason that women are expected to cover up is so they don't tempt men. It's an extreme version of "she asked for it." The men don't have to take responsibility for their own behavior.

One of my grad school friends was constantly groped while traveling alone in the Middle East. Because she went around with her head uncovered and short sleeves, she was seen as a "loose women." After she put on a scarf, wore sunglasses to hide her blue eyes, and put on a long-sleeved shirt, no one bothered her. It's sad that she had to do that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Big difference between a scarf, long sleeves, and sunglasses and a burqa
I think the wearing of the burqa in the US should be banned. Not because it's anti-muslim, but because it's anti woman.

I would not like to explain to small children why a woman is walking around covered in cloth. I would not want any child to be aware of this and what it stands for.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Either one is uncomfortable when it's 95 degrees out
Look at pictures of Iran, Saudi Arabia or any other place where women are required to cover up. The men get to wear what they please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. No nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
16. Where in this country is a woman required to cover her face in public?

Strawperson argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. The post is not about this country, but a custom that is worldwide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. required by the husband or religion.
Try not to be so deliberately obtuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
astral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-09-11 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. BANNING it in the US is just plain wrong.
Here women will follow whatever cultural traditions they want, nobody is "forcing" them to do anything. We can't regulate that any more than we can regulate whether a woman is forced to have sex with her husband against her will behind closed doors. Only the woman herself can do something, and that is completely HER business.

Don't be fearful of the differences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It WAS ruled that the woman who wanted her face covered on her driver's license,
was out of luck. Good sense has no religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. We've banned a number of social practices oppressive to women.
Difference isn't the problem here. The oppression of women is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demoiselle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Um...it may be a hard case to prove...
but I am given to understand that forcing a woman to have sex against her will...even with her husband...is called rape in this country.
How do you feel about female circumcision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. We can and do regulate what women can wear in public.
"Disappearing" women via shrouding or entirely as with the case of the Hassid newspaper and Hillary Clinton's pic definitely deserves discussion. Our society has a long history of debating what women (and men) are legally allowed to wear in public. I don't think practices that disappear women get some kind of pass from that kind of public debate and scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. Also the argument against media control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here ask these two guys on the left if they feel equal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Damn, I didn't mean for this post to be a thread killer
But it was.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Yep. You killed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-13-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. Well, I think if a woman wants to grow a beard like that, it's her choice and her right.
There, I kicked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC