Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Man-on-Dog doesn't want Teh Gay in the history books

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:39 PM
Original message
Man-on-Dog doesn't want Teh Gay in the history books
from thinkprogress:




Santorum Says He Does ‘Not Approve’ Of Teaching History Of Gay Americans In California Schools


A bill moving through the California legislature compels the state to add gay history to the state education curriculum. Predictably, just as the addition of African American history and civil rights history to California school textbooks stirred right-wing hatred during the 1960′s, conservatives are railing against the effort. As the Associated Press notes, “California law already requires schools to teach about women, African Americans, Mexican Americans, entrepreneurs, Asian Americans, European Americans, American Indians and labor.”

On Friday, ThinkProgress caught up with former Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA) at the South Carolina Silver Elephant Dinner, where he had just finished his keynote address. Santorum said he was “not surprised” by the California bill, which he said is a “logical consequence” of court decisions “creating rights.” Presumably, Santorum is referring to the multiple court decisions affirming the right of gay marriage in California. In any case, Santorum said he “certainly would not approve” of teaching gay history:

FANG: I don’t know if you’ve seen the news, but California is adopting in their state curriculum for public education a required teaching of the gay rights movement. Are you troubled by that at all? I know you’ve written and talked about this issue of education.

SANTORUM: Well what I talked about is that there are consequences of the court’s actions and I think the court, by ruling the way they did, has created a precedent that states now have to follow, and some states are going farther others. I certainly would not approve of that, but there’s a logical consequence to the courts injecting themselves in creating rights and people attaching their legislative ideas to those rights that in some respects could logically flow from that. So I’m not surprised.


Watch it: http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/10/santorum-gay-history/


Brandishing his anti-gay social conservative values, Santorum would like schools to censor the contributions of gay American scholars, inventors, and activists. Perhaps he would like to bury the fact that even his own campaign slogan, “Fighting to make America America again,” is borrowed from the gay Harlem Renaissance poet Langston Hughes.


http://thinkprogress.org/2011/05/10/santorum-gay-history/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't approve of Santorum having a job
higher then flipping burgers at the local Micky D's, because he doesn't have the intelligence to do anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And you better double-check your order if he's doing that.
nt


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpankMe Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. State's rights, Rick, you asshole.
State's rights. If you Republican bastards are so gung ho on state's rights, then leave Cali alone and let her be the liberal petri dish of the U.S. Stay out of our shit.

You'll never be president you dildo tester.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hey don't make fun of dildo testers
They do valuable work!:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. How about a reciprocal push to get Man on Dog removed
from the history books?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should have thought of that before he had a gay sex act by-product named after him. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. It would be fascinating to know why Sanctorectum is so shit-scared of Teh Gay. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm sure California schools don't approve of the frothy Man-on-Dog Santorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Why do we give a fuck what Santorum thinks? n/t
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-10-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Never realized that Santorum and I had similiar view points...
See personally I'd like to make sure that Rick Santorum is not taught in any history books either

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC