Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don’t We Owe our Military Women the Same Protections as the Men?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:07 AM
Original message
Don’t We Owe our Military Women the Same Protections as the Men?
Edited on Sat May-28-11 11:11 AM by kpete
Don’t We Owe our Military Women the Same Protections as the Men?
Published 1, May 28, 2011 Uncategorized Leave a Comment

Respectfully submitted by Lawrence Rafferty,(rafflaw), Guest Blogger

In the past we have discussed the ongoing war on Women that is being waged by the Right, but this latest example is a tough one to swallow. When military women are raped while in the service, it turns out that military health insurance does not cover abortions, even when the servicewoman has been raped. I discovered this sad fact when I was reading the ACLU Blog. Jessica Kenyon joined the Army in 2005 and while on duty she was raped by a fellow member of the Army and made the mistake of not reporting it.

“I was raped by a fellow soldier when I was stationed in Korea. I found out I was pregnant as a result of the rape when my commander called me into his office one day to charge me with adultery. A doctor at the medical center had told my commander — but not me — that I was pregnant. I hadn’t reported the rape because I was trying to “soldier on” and I didn’t trust my chain of command. This is an environment where women are constantly targeted for various forms of abuse. As it turns out I was not charged, not because I was raped, but because I was divorced. Then I faced the fact that military health insurance doesn’t allow abortion coverage in cases of rape, and I was unable to have a safe abortion off-base, so I was stuck. I was discharged from the military due to the trauma of the rape and attacks. I flew back home to the U.S. after being discharged from the Army for my own safety and ended up miscarrying.” ACLU Blog

Doesn’t it seem a tad inequitable that a woman service member cannot be treated for the crimes committed against them by male members of the military? Congress would cure this problem if given the chance, wouldn’t they? Congress did have the chance recently and they turned up their collective noses on the idea that military rape victims should be able to obtain an abortion under the military health insurance plans! “The Davis-Andrews-DeGette-Maloney-Sanchez-Slaughter Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act should have been a no-brainer. It would have allowed the military health system to cover abortion care in cases of rape and incest – just as the federal government does in the Medicaid program, for federal employees and for women who use the Indian Health Service, among others. All the amendment would do is stop singling out U.S. servicewomen and military families for inferior treatment. And yet, last night, House leadership prevented debate and a floor vote on this important amendment. Never mind that the House will vote on 152 other defense bill amendments; anti-choice members decided that the wellbeing of U.S. servicewomen wasn’t worth 10 minutes of debate.” ACLU Blog Who are these people who would treat military women different from any other citizen who has been brutally raped? They are your faithful servants and Representatives in the United States House of Representatives!

.................

http://jonathanturley.org/2011/05/28/dont-we-owe-our-military-women-the-same-protections-as-the-men/#more-35574
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. Indeed we do.
That we do not afford them that is a shame on our society.

However, I believe that all rapes and sexual assaults should be reported by the victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No, and it serves them right for having vaginas!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-28-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. Unfortunately, it would be a violation of the federal health care law, preventing the US Government
from funding abortions.

Since the military is part of the US/Federal government, all abortions, even those resulting from rape, cannot be funded.

It's one of those bad consequences from that part of the law.

It's HR 3, HR 97, etc during the year-long health care battle. Remember when President Obama drafted an agreement re-affirming that part of the law that was already in effect, just to get votes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC