|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
annm4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 06:50 PM Original message |
'The War You Don't See': A Film You Won't See; It has been Banned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
1. Ann, snot posted about this last night. You know what we have to do? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 07:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Whatever you guys think is best, I'm in. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleko (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. It also might help if lots of people contacted Lannan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:09 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. You're right. Thanks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
annm4peace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. that is what I was hoping |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:46 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. After dinner, I will go get that information and post it here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BOHICA12 (231 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
3. Banning implies governmental involvement .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 07:57 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not really. The owner of the venue bans people. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
5. "News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising." ~ Lord Northcliffe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:20 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. Thanx Tierra |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 11:09 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. I don't know. Sorry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:23 PM Response to Reply #8 |
53. He lived from 1865-1922. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:11 AM Response to Reply #5 |
34. Excellent quote. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:26 PM Response to Original message |
9. Our First Amendment Rights... What A Joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:28 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. How did this violate the First Amendment? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 09:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Not The Letter, But The Spirit... What Are They Afraid Of ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 06:41 AM Response to Reply #16 |
29. Neither the letter nor the spirit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #29 |
104. One is lies and one is the truth. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 11:02 PM Response to Reply #104 |
115. Neither of which have anything whatsoever to do with the 1st Amendment. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #16 |
71. How did this violate the spirit of the 1st Amendment? If anything it upholds the spirit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SheilaT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
12. This was actually front page news in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. And without explanation of any kind. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 08:54 PM Response to Original message |
15. An institute deciding not to show a film is not the same thing as it being "banned". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WillyT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 09:47 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Ok... Here re Some Words... Cowardly, Unprofessional, Gutless, Clueless, Weasel-Like... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Yes, but that's not the same as it being "banned". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:51 AM Original message |
Great. Where can I see this film? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Great. Where can I see this film? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:14 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. You mean aside from clicking the link in the OP and going to where it says "Buy DVD"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 09:25 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. I can't afford to buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiotgardener (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Has everything you can't afford been banned? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:48 AM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Is censored a better word for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
el_bryanto (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:52 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. It's obviously troubling; but we don't know both sides to this story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiotgardener (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:39 AM Response to Reply #35 |
44. Both things bother me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:14 PM Response to Reply #35 |
72. How is it being censored? Just buy the DVD if you want to see it. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:41 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Look up the word censorship. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
76. All this from an ancient Roman office that counted population... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:52 PM Response to Reply #76 |
77. "There's nothing bad about it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #30 |
41. If you were seeing it at the Lannan Foundation, would you need to buy a ticket? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:01 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. Does the ticket cost as much as the DVD? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #47 |
78. Oh, for fuck's sake. So, according to you, if it isn't free or is too expensive, it's "banned"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:58 PM Response to Reply #78 |
96. It was banned at the place it was to be shown |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 05:56 PM Response to Reply #96 |
99. Actually, you yourself asserted that you 'should be able to see it' if it's not 'banned' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiotgardener (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:24 PM Response to Reply #41 |
54. Plus trip to Santa Fe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #23 |
85. Breaking News: "Banned" film can be watched for free on the internet. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:57 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. I have one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:57 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Yes, it is. That is what that word means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. No, if it was "banned", you wouldn't be able to see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:00 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. The film was banned at the venue. Crack a dictionary. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:29 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Semantic games. The obvious implication of the hyperbole-laden headline is that somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:43 AM Response to Reply #42 |
45. Performers use the term all the time about venues. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #45 |
81. If the film was that great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:44 PM Original message |
+1. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #81 |
107. You really don't know about John Pilger's work. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Where do you get that I'm not familiar with Pilger's work? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiotgardener (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 06:35 PM Response to Reply #39 |
103. I don't see that anywhere in the story. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:53 AM Response to Reply #15 |
38. it's the old "it's banned" tactic of promotion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:31 AM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Exactly. What better way to make people want to see your film or read your book |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
52. O.k. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
80. Write to Lannan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
84. Yes, because everyone who disagrees with the use of the word 'banned' is part of the conspiracy to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. No, they're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:10 PM Response to Reply #15 |
49. Apparently it's been banned from that institution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #49 |
83. as stated by the film makers... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 05:59 PM Response to Reply #83 |
101. "non-trovercy" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Agony (865 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-12-11 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
18. MIC in the family |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
21. John Pilger is one of the best. This is awful. The censorship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:48 AM Response to Original message |
22. Sigh, another call to add to my list tomorrow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
24. This is the link to all the people booked until 6/15. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 09:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Thanks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:04 AM Response to Original message |
32. Unrec'd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 10:49 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Recced to counter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brooklynite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #36 |
68. Well, hard to challenge an argument like that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:06 AM Response to Original message |
40. "Banned" isn't the correct word |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 11:48 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Of all the goofy things to nitpick, this is pretty goofy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
56. I'm sure the Republicans feel the same way when we object to being called appeasers n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:50 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. Feel the same way as what? That doesn't even make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. That of all the objections, this one is goofy n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:59 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. It is and doesn't speak to the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. And, as I said, its the same thing Repugs say when we object to being called 'appeasers' n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:08 PM Response to Reply #64 |
69. Well no. "Appeasers" is an insult and "banning" is the appropriate term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:46 PM Response to Reply #46 |
88. No, "banned" is not the proper word in this context. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
48. We really ought to leave misuse of terms to the right wing. They're better at it anyway... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:15 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Although finding out why this film, which was was previously scheduled, has apparently been banned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:45 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. You understand that you aren't doing any cause credit by misusing terms in it's defense, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Upton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:52 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. How about suppressed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Why exaggerate at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. Censored is appropriate, too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 05:57 PM Response to Reply #59 |
100. Ah, I get it now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:04 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. Except that the term is not being used incorrectly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:06 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. One organization with one theater deciding not to show a film is not 'banning' by any stretch of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:09 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. It was banned by the organization from the theatre. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
idiotgardener (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #70 |
105. No, it was canceled by the organization at the theater. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
51. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
62. I've called and left a message for them to call me to discuss. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #62 |
73. How many business hours? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
65. "Banned" works for me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disillusioned73 (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:27 PM Response to Reply #65 |
79. I agree.. and now it is on my list of "must see" docs.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #79 |
86. Looks like his plan worked, then (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:15 PM Response to Reply #86 |
92. Hey!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:25 PM Response to Reply #92 |
94. In what sense is Assange a "whistleblower"? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:57 PM Response to Reply #94 |
95. I get it. ( wink..wink) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 04:37 PM Response to Reply #95 |
97. How can a non-US citizen be a "traitor" to the US? (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 11:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
116. You are right, they cannot. But they can be guilty of espionage. And, if the country in which they |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
disillusioned73 (963 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 08:19 PM Response to Reply #86 |
106. If your implying that this was/is a publicity stunt... so what.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 01:32 PM Response to Original message |
74. Full copy now posted in the video forum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:30 PM Response to Reply #74 |
82. Yes, but despite the fact that people can WATCH IT FOR FREE ON THE INTERNET |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dipsydoodle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 02:44 PM Response to Reply #82 |
87. Well - if you'd been UK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:08 PM Response to Reply #82 |
90. That's not the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FLPanhandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #90 |
91. The title of this thread is "A Film You Won't See; It has been Banned" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 06:16 PM Response to Reply #91 |
102. It's almost like they planned to do this when they gave it that title. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 07:45 AM Response to Reply #102 |
109. It would be nice if those arguing for the word "banned" would issue a mea culpa here. Now that we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 01:48 PM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Don't hold your breath... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 11:01 PM Response to Reply #110 |
114. Yeah, well, I'm going to bookmark this one for the next time they pull garbage like this n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #102 |
112. yeah... a conspiracy no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren DeMontague (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 06:37 PM Response to Reply #112 |
113. Nah, just a marketing ploy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yawnmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
93. How is it banned...or even censored, if it is freely available for viewing (or purchase)?... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #93 |
111. Man, my demo tape was banned by another A&R exec... (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jun-13-11 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
98. You can get it in PAL format on amazon.uk, along with another film "you won't see"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-14-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
117. What a bullshit response from Lannan...read below... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Javaman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jun-15-11 07:26 AM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Not bullshit at all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 07:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC