Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High level of radiation exposure estimated. NHK WORLD NEWS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sce56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:27 PM
Original message
High level of radiation exposure estimated. NHK WORLD NEWS

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/24_02.html
A group of doctors has found that the estimated level of accumulated internal radiation exposure for people living in Fukushima Prefecture has exceeded 3 millisieverts. The researchers, including doctors who have provided medical care to A-bomb survivors, conducted analysis on the food and urine of 15 residents in Iitate Village and Kawamata Town in Fukushima Prefecture. These areas are about 40 kilometers from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. They estimate that residents have been internally exposed to up to 3.2 millisieverts for about 2 months, measuring from the date of the accident in March until early May.

Three millisieverts is 3 times higher than the long-term annual limit for ordinary people recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection. One of the researchers, Nanao Kamada, says people should refrain from eating vegetables grown in the area where high levels of radiation have been detected.

Friday, June 24, 2011 07:00 +0900 (JST)



They are truly screwed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. 3 millisieverts is not a "high level of radiation." It won't even notably increase risk of cancer.
In comparison, a potentially fatal dose of radiation starts at 1,000 millisieverts. That's for people with compromised immune systems, and the elderly. Otherwise healthy people require 2,000 to 5,000. Substantially increased risk of cancer begins around 200 millisieverts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is internal not external...
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 11:54 PM by nebenaube
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. An internal dose is not automatically hundreds of times higher than an external dose. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. For Alpha Particles, Internal is Thousands of Times Worse than External
Edited on Fri Jun-24-11 01:33 AM by AndyTiedye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. In this case the particles of concerns tend to be standard beta decay emiters.
Which means beta/gamma flux. Also both Sieverts and Rem are already corrected for quality factor, so this is a total effect amount and not a flux level. Uncorrected units are typically in CPM or roentgen or some other reporting method.

There are very few fission products that decay via alpha emission, and I can not think of any off the top of my head. Typically alpha is derived from radon decay daughters and other heavy elements. Coal likes to send some of this stuff out. The Plutonium MOX from #4 spent pool IS a concern for this, however it also has a relatively lengthy half life and so requires a larger amount to produce a similar dose compared to I131, Co60, Sr90, and Cs137. I131 is a beta/gamma emitter, and is likely the primary nuclide for the currently reported dosages. Fortunately thyroid cancer has a 96% 5-year survival rate on average and Japan has a strong health care system.

The Uranium is not an element of concern, other than for it's properties in regards to heavy metal poisoning. The particle strength is quite weak and the half life is so long it is listed as stable on the periodic table of elements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. 3 mSv is a years dose on average.
So yes, it is significant. 1 Sv = 100 Rem. So we're talking 300 mRem. Doubling the yearly dose is a significant increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. The English translation needs to be cleaned up a bit
At first the article makes it seem like residents throughout the entire 5500-square-mile prefecture are exposed to these radiation levels, but further reading indicates that tests were conducted on 15 people in two municipalities that are about 40km/25 miles from the reactors and have long been known to be "hot spots". I would be interested in further data, such as the results of studies conducted on residents elsewhere in Fukushima Prefecture (such as Iwaki, Aizuwakamatsu and Kitakata), as well as neighboring areas in Ibaraki and Miyagi prefectures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Sounds a bit like DU.
1000s of posts posted, and every couple days, someone posts something like they have not read a single post I have made.

And it is not them that will pay, but the control systems trying to censor that think the ground floor is all there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
DU Political Videos: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x594780">Researchers Simulate Fukushima Radiation Spread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC