|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
supraTruth (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:19 PM Original message |
From 1940 - 1963 (23 YEARS!) the top marginal U.S. Income Tax Rate was 81% to 94%, & yet we became |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mysuzuki2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. The hay-day of unions too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. If lower tax rates on the rich causes job creation ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MyshkinCommaPrince (227 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yeh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nilram (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:49 PM Response to Original message |
4. And yet the WSJ had an article today saying how awful, AWFUL it would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnlinePoker (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:02 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. For the 70% marginal, an example of a California teacher was given |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
17. something wrong there. you don't pay income or state taxes on the whole 60K. and the employee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OnlinePoker (837 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 07:07 AM Response to Reply #17 |
25. As a Canadian, I don't know what deductions you're allowed in California pretax. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 11:26 AM Response to Reply #25 |
27. I think you don't understand what "marginal rate" means. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Your article calculates a 71% marginal tax rate on a California teacher making $60k |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:45 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. In spite of inaccurate numbers, the point of the OP is correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Consistent with Our Country's Decline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:00 PM Response to Original message |
6. As the tax rate falls, the peasant rate rises and much of the country descends |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
9. How do you have 94% marginal tax rates when state taxes are often 10%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:36 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. For one thing, the state taxes are deductible from the federal taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:43 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Ah the good ole exemptions. Aka loopholes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. marginal doesn't mean what you think it does? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nashville_brook (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:12 PM Response to Original message |
10. that is how the middle class was born. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
13. Historically, high taxes on the richest brought prosperity to all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kablooie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
14. But the super rich weren't as super rich and that's what counts to them today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bayareamike (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
15. I was wondering if |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Igel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:42 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. no, it's phoney as hell. for starters, employees don't pay 15% fica. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JHB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 03:05 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. No, that's taking all income at the top rate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
20. Excellent point. K&R. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:51 AM Response to Original message |
22. Progressive income tax and strong regulation of financial markets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 04:30 AM Response to Original message |
24. none of this occurs in a vacuum |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WatsonT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 08:31 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-19-11 02:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. "tons of competition" = lol. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC