Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Worst Nanny State Law proposed recently

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:17 PM
Original message
Poll question: Worst Nanny State Law proposed recently
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 03:08 PM by Taverner
Even though I am a Liberal, A Socialist and a Progressive, I find Nanny State laws to be the kind of things that give us, the Democrats and the liberals, a bad name.

Some of us still believe in individual freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Republicans I work with say 'nanny state' constantly
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 02:21 PM by niceypoo
They get it from Limbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. In terms of electoral impact
the ban on lightbulbs is the biggest one, it affects everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dude, you do realize there was no -
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 02:22 PM by Hell Hath No Fury
"ban on toys in Happy Meals" here in SF? Kids will still get their cheap, Chinese made toxic toy with their Happy Meal -- that meal just has to be a bit healthier than a greasy burger with greasy fries and sugary coke.

And as the ban on plastic bags, go check out that miles wide plastic particle slick hanging out in the Pacific and then tell me the ban is a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. People who harp on the "nanny state" rarely grasp the fact that their actions impact others.
It's like arguing with a five-year-old who stamps their feet and declares, "But I want it!" over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Newsom Vetoed it. But I'm counting those that almost became law
Gavin Newsom has been one of the most impressive policymakers in our party.

I hope he becomes President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. You can have him.
I've had my fill of him as Mayor. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Are you upset because he cheated with his friend's wife?
Or is it more on policy?

He's fought to keep the 420 clubs open, he's actually done something positive about the homeless population, he's brought a lot of money into both SF and the City Coffers. His only weak spot is the Police Department, but that's not his fault. No matter who gets appointed Chief, there is some serious corruption and hatred within that department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. But kids *like* that "greasy burger with greasy fries and sugary coke." That decision should be left
to their parents, not the city council.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Exactly
And add to that that most regular McDonalds customers don't take their family there for every meal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. we need lots more laws like these and since people are tricked by unscrupulous
advertising along with stimulating chemicals and drugs into eating and drinking all the wrong things, someone has to put some breaks on it all. And why hasn't styrofoam been banned yet?

Or should advertising of dangerous products be banned- would that be better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberswede Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unrec for repugnant "Nanny State" term. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. +-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. +-2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Banning drop side cribs is one of the dumbest IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hate smoking with a purple and undying passion
but banning it outdoors is just plain stupid and self defeating. It's over the top and ultimately unenforceable.

Any law that tries to make sin illegal by making what adults consent to do with their own bodies illegal is a nanny law and creates maximum misery as authorities are forced to be heavy handed in trying to stamp out popular behavior.

Unfortunately, Republicans have co opted the term to cover any program that directly benefits the citizens of this country in any way, either by regulating corporations or supporting the old and infirm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is "Nanny state" a politically correct term? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa D Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. "Nanny State" is republican-speak
It's a negative term republicans use to frame ANY govt. program they don't like. Democrats are supposed to be better than that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. None of the above...
Edited on Wed Dec-15-10 02:32 PM by onehandle
Ok, the Happy Meal toy ban was kinda dumb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Though we are a country as far away from a nanny state as a banana
republic can be, I would have to say smoking outside. It makes no intellectual sense unless one is trying to force the individual to quit smoking by force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. So define what you mean by "nanny state" and "individual freedoms?"
Because those are usually code words for, "I want to do what I want to do and don't give a shit if my choices or actions negatively impact others."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'd define criminalizing drug use that way. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Whole other argument, but I was hoping the OP would chime in.
Thanks, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. Yes indeed, the war on drugs is a complete nanny state policy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. A Nanny State
Yes, it is a mainly Republican term, but its not without reason.

Take smoking. I understand banning smoking inside. It makes sense, and 2nd hand smoke is a killer. It also ruins a perfectly good meal.

However, Los Gatos, CA, recently banned smoking inside and out. This means you can only smoke in your home or back yard. Completely unnecessary, and designed to piss people off.

Take the banning of flavored cigarettes - supposedly this was banned because it makes kids smoke. But the rate of youths smoking has been going down steadily, even during the time these were on the market. The health education campaign worked. Raising taxes worked (although you only get to pull that lever so many times.) All banning flavored cigarettes does is piss off smokers who smoke those kinds of cigarettes.

So the Nanny State is a term for policy where the government mandates behavioral change for no good reason, except to just do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Fair enough.
I'm sure we'd quibble over some of the items you'd mentioned in your poll, but no biggie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. It's funny, I left out the War on Drugs
Which is the epitome of Nanny State Laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I don't know if I see drug laws as "nanny state."
That would mean I believe that those in government have our best interests at heart. I don't. The Drug War exists because it makes a lot of people, whether private businesses or government entities (or a combination of both) a shitload of money.

Same with cigarette taxes. They don't care about getting people to quit, it's nothing more than a cash grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. The nanny state mandate of buying a defective product from criminals. Of course, that is from
a "Bad Nanny" - not Mrs. Doubtfire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. It will be interesting to see if the HC Mandate will be just that
Of course, it also might work well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
27. I voted banning of smoking outside but should have voted Other: War on Drugs and/or all vice laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Yes
I left that off, not sure why, but it would end up as #1 - so maybe its best
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC