|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
thewiseguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:22 PM Original message |
China Rating Agency Downgrades US Debt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:25 PM Original message |
So what. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
1. And this is not about the debt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:27 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. This this this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. PS I left you data, 900 billion is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tsuki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I think the unstable political system may scare them more than the Bush tax cuts. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:09 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. I think you are right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oasis_ (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. Not really |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Here, from their statement, black and white |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oasis_ (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:07 AM Response to Reply #9 |
19. OK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Disengenous by giving you the exact words used |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 03:21 AM Response to Reply #19 |
29. The real question is our lagging growth rate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oasis_ (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:12 AM Response to Reply #9 |
23. Did you see this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oasis_ (201 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:23 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. OR |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Capn Sunshine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:55 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. here's their exact quote from their press release |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
3. Read the editorial about how someone placed a billion dollar bet on a downgrade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You believe the bush tax cuts are going away? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:45 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think S&P is very dirty politically, they want 4 trillion in cuts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Here is their statement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:52 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. bs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:56 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Did you read it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:55 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. Their statement is cover so they don't look partisan nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Actually no, their statment follows a long line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I think Robert Reich analyzed it pretty well nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:03 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. And in this he is having a case of cognitive dissonance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 03:23 AM Response to Reply #3 |
30. No doubt true, flamingdem. I had the same thought but no evidence to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indurancevile (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. oh bs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamingdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-05-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Check out the editorial about the unknown person who traded 1 Billion today that they'd downgrade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
22. Well, I honestly don't give a fuck about YOUR opinion of this country's economic stability. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:19 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. You being forced to read it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:24 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. That's not my point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zax2me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-06-11 12:52 AM Response to Original message |
27. As well they should - our credit is a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:32 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC