Cameron Todd Willingham: Wrongfully Convicted and Executed in Texas
Much info here:
http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.phpThis site includes every document that could be obtained from the trial transcripts to reports issued about the case.
Some key points:
On December 23, 1991, a fire destroyed the Corsicana, Texas, home Cameron Todd Willingham shared with his wife and three daughters, killing the three girls. Willingham, who was asleep when the fire started, survived. His wife was at the Salvation Army buying Christmas presents for the girl.
<snip>
He was convicted based on the testimony of forensic experts who said they had determined that the fire was intentionally set and a jailhouse informant who said Willingham had confessed to him. On October 29, 1992, he was sentenced to death.
(Note: The original forensic experts testified after using outdated methods. They never had training in more modern techniques.)
<snip>
Thirteen years later, in the days leading up to Willingham’s execution, his attorneys sent the governor and the Board of Pardon and Parole a report from Gerald Hurst, a nationally recognized arson expert, saying that Willingham’s conviction was based on erroneous forensic analysis. Documents obtained by the Innocence Project show that state officials received that report but apparently did not act on it. Willingham was executed by lethal injection in Huntsville on February 17, 2004.
<snip>
In 2008, the Texas Forensic Science Commission agreed to investigate the case. The panel’s review was interrupted several times over the last two years, however, and continues today. In 2009, an arson expert hired by the commission issued a report finding that experts who testified at Willingham’s trial should have known it was wrong at the time. Days before the expert was set to testify, however,
Gov. Rick Perry replaced key members of the panel, delayed the investigation for months. An investigative report in the September 7, 2009, issue of the New Yorker deconstructs every facet of the state’s case against Willingham. The 16,000-word article by David Grann shows that all of the evidence used against Willingham was invalid, including the forensic analysis, the informant’s testimony, other witness testimony and additional circumstantial evidence.
<snip>
http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Cameron_Todd_Willingham_Wrongfully_Convicted_and_Executed_in_Texas.phpRick Perry refused to even consider the new findings before Willingham was executed. This was not a Karla Faye Tucker case in which somebody had already been convicted, but one wonders about her too.
Later, Perry did every thing in his power along with his cronies in every part of the judicial system to obstruct the commission he set up to review the findings.
IMO Perry is guilty of premeditated murder. His mantra is 'Guilty until proven innocent and gawd help you even in that case.'
He wanted to be seen as tough on crime at the expense of an innocent man.