Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama joins assault on WikiLeaks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:16 PM
Original message
Barack Obama joins assault on WikiLeaks


Barack Obama joins WikiLeaks assault
December 13, 2010

US President Barack Obama has offered his strongest condemnation yet of WikiLeaks' "deplorable" documents dump.

The US President made his comments in a call to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan yesterday, the White House said.

Mr Obama "expressed his regrets for the deplorable action by WikiLeaks, and the two leaders agreed that it would not influence or disrupt the close co-operation between the United States and Turkey", his office said.

The comments, echoed in a call to his Mexican counterpart Felipe Calderon, were Mr Obama's most forceful yet against the website, whose steady leaking of a trove of secret US diplomatic cables has polarised opinion.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/barack-obama-joins-wikileaks-assault/story-e6frg6so-1225969774315


--------------------------------------------



Obama lashes out amid calls to free Assange
December 13, 2010

WASHINGTON: Barack Obama has made his strongest condemnation yet of WikiLeaks, as supporters of Julian Assange demonstrated for his release.

Mr Assange was described as in ''very good'' spirits but ''frustrated'' that he could not answer the allegations that WikiLeaks was behind cyber attacks against the credit card firms that have refused to do business with the website.

''He told me he is absolutely not involved and this is a deliberate attempt to conflate WikiLeaks, which is a publishing organisation, with hacking organisations, which are not,'' Ms Robinson said.

Mr Assange's mother, Christine, was quoted as saying she was worried for her son because ''massive forces'' were ranged against him.

http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/obama-lashes-out-amid-calls-to-free-assange-20101212-18u2c.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. wonder if he feels the same way about outing CIA operatives
guess we already know the answser to that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not if it's done by Republicans during the Bush government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. How do you blame Obama for the Plame outing?
Noting that "The Australian" is a Rupert Murdoch publication.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Reuters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. There is no mention of the Plame outing in that link
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 06:43 PM by emulatorloo
Dr. Dan and Better Believe It seems to be suggesting that Obama "approved" the Plame outing, or had some complicity in the plame outing, or didn't care about the Plame outing or something along those lines.


(you and I talked about the reuters story yesterday - thanks for the link)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. I never suggested he approved or was complicit in it. I do see his willingness to
ignore an investigation ("let's move ahead") while in the same breath show indignation over the wikileaks.

Does that not bother you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
34. The Bush government has been forgiven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Oh, you! Look forward! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. No condemnation of the NY Times or The Guardian? Hmmmm.
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 06:22 PM by GodlessBiker
Where does he think most people actually read about the content on the cables? The vast majority did not log on to the Wikileaks website or one of its mirrors.

It's just too easy to attack a foreign website than a big corporation here at home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinterParkDonkey Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Okay, this may sound silly,,,,
how were they able to hack into ultra top-secret emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Somebody gave them the contents of the cables.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
35. That's good, not bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. They got them given to them by a US Army Private
who leaked them. Our modern equivalent of the Pentagon Papers.

Wiki is the equivalent of the NYT in the 70s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrfrapp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Is that an established fact?
I keep reading that a "US Army Private" leaked the cables. I'm assuming you are referring to Bradley Manning but I don't recall any admission from any party that Manning was behind these particular leaks. Are you referring to another US Army Private or to Manning?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. So far he is the only one facing possible charges
as soon as the Army finishes it's investigation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
36. Manning supposedly bragged about it in emails to someone else,
who turned them over to the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
40. google bradley manning boingboing
he confessed in a chat log.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. Obama was talking to two diplomats on the telephone
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 06:37 PM by emulatorloo
Wikileaks is the source of the leaks of the Turkish and Mexican cables that were supposed to be confidential. NYT printed them sure, but doubt the diplomats care about that.

Context.

I honestly dont know what DU wants from OBAMA on this.

We might be happy that wikileaks leaked confidential documents, but they aren't our secure documents. They are going to be of use to historians reporters and activists.

I don't understand why DU thinks Obama should be Celebrating a Security Breach? That isn't logical.

If a doctor leaked your medical records to the internet would you be happy about it? I might be happy to read them, but would you think it was a good thing and praise the person who did it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. There is no comparison to private medical records and
news organizations uses 'unnamed sources' or 'whistle-blowers to report on governments' activities. That is the main reason for the addition of the 1st Amendment to our Constitution by the FFs.

This president is supposedly a Constitutional lawyer, not to mention that he took an oath to defend and protect our Constitution.

He could have spoken privately and assured these leaders that despite the embarrassing and FACTUAL information released in the cables, the U.S. would like the information not to influence their relationships. There was absolutely NO need to mention the news organization responsible for releasing them.

They are trying to silence Wikileaks which apparently plans to release information on corruption in the banking system, and THAT is when this government went after them and tried to charge them with a crime. Assange, two weeks ago, revealed that information.

I want to know what these banks were doing. This president nor any other elected official has a right to gag the news media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:54 PM
Original message
Wikileaks wasn't the source of them, the person who gave the cables to ....
Wikileaks was the source. If that source had given the cables directly to the NY Times, would the President's tone have been different?

What do you think his thoughts are on the Pentagon Papers leak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. true the private gave the materials to WikiLeaks, and they orchestrated the leaks
I wonder if any body has asked him about the Pentagon Papers leaks? (FWIW I have not seen anything like what we got from the Pentagon Papers in this batch of cables. But who knows what's coming next.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. .
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 06:55 PM by GodlessBiker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Word response has been MEH!
and this should have been the oficial response.

And trut be told more than a few of those cables fall in the category of... you kid me, this is breaking news? REALLY... in one particular case, what the 18th century?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Calderon was upset because he expected stuff to be confidential
And a lot of those things were "less than breaking news' but I guess Obama needed to smooth it over with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The lack of coordination between federal agencies
in Mexico is legend... and yes goes all the way back to the 18th century.

I read the Mexican Press and it was pretty much... this affects no relations, we knew this.

We also know of the other big open secret... the corruption.

Here is a story that happened to me as an EMT... and it is symbolic of the whole mess, or lack of cooperation.

We got a call for a pedestrian vs vehicle. Well not only us, also the ERUM, that is the police ambulance service. We arrived at the same time. My driver parked the rig strategically so the other guys could not get their gurney out. I mean we would not want THEM to beat us, now would we? Multiply that by 32 states, who do not get along with each other very well, let alone the Feds, and multiple agencies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. That's an awful story.
I've experience similar kinds of TURF problems in a hospital I used to work in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Yep it was, and that was Mexico City
Tijuana we pretty much avoided those... but in Mexico City people at times got to fist to cuffs... not kidding.

On the bright side, that patient was transported to the hospital, and the ahem turf battle didn't get out of hand.

I used it as an example... a very easy to understand example.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Perhaps Mr. President if you
told the American people what was going on in their country
there would be no need to have a document dump.
Close that door, the American people have no need to know!!
If you are embarrassed, too bad.
I have the right to know what this country is doing in my name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Keep in mind that Rupert Murdoch owns The Australian
So expect that they will sensationalize this phone call and/or misrepresent the meaning and significance of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Obama was overheard making the comments in a call to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan
Not how it was described but still.......

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Embarrassing, isn't it? Where's the old "freedom of speech' and
'land of the free' American approach? To me, and I've really thought about this, the President could have used Wikileaks to his (and our) advantage. He could have said he campaigned on transparency and although the leaks may put America in a bad light, it's past time to air the dirty laundry and get back on track and that he won't hinder the releases. imho
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeaBagsAreForCups Donating Member (320 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. And this surprises anyone from...
... our "progressive" President ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. What President is going to praise a security breach?
Can we inject a little rationality here?

I'm not making any statement about the value of leaks. I just think it is irrational to expect any President to praise a security breach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. What happened to the transformative outsider I campaigned for?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Did he campaign on leaking Mexico's confidential communications?
I must have missed that speech?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. You can have "transparency" or you can have diplomacy....
They are mutually exclusive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. How about ending secret diplomacy? That's another option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Instead of just dismissing you...
.. I'll ask what exactly that means.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. It's called transparency. You know .... President Obama campaigned on that issue. Did you forget
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-15-10 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #38
46. How grandiose. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. That is as old as the rise of civilization
so no, it ain't gonna happen.

But the over reaction from our government has been ... somewhat comedic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. I can understand why he's upset.
There goes his legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. Good.
Random leaking is like throwing a Molotov cocktail into a fireworks factory just to see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. Not really. Wikileaks has been responsible for reforms all over
in the short time they have been operating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-13-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
45. More change and hope
Edited on Mon Dec-13-10 05:12 PM by somone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC