|
Edited on Tue Aug-30-11 09:16 AM by demwing
I just read here on DU that America doesn't really want Progressive Candidates, and the evidence presented was that we all voted for Tea Party lunatics in 2010.
This is a pretty typical assumption - that the Tea Party had a high level of success in 2010, but I'm here to tell ya that this is pure grade horse shit.
In the Senate, 5 Tea Party candidates won office, and 5 lost.
5 WON PA- Pat Toomey KY- Rand Paul FL- Marco Rubio WI- Ron Johnson UT- Mike Lee
5 LOST AK- Joe Miller CO- Ken Buck DE- Christine O’Donnell NV- Sharron Angle WV- John Raese
Wow, looks like a 50% success rate. Not bad!
Except there were a few more races in the Senate, where either the Tea Party didn't win the primary, or didn't care to try, so the real numbers are a little more revealing - of the 39 Senate races in 2010, Tea Party candidates won a total of 13%.
Nice wave, bro.
But Dems held the Senate, right? What about the House? The Tea Party swept the House, or so we're told
Well, 43 House candidates for the Tea Party won, and 87 lost. A full 33% of those races went to the Tea Party - that's considerably better than any 3rd party has performed in the country...well, ever!
Tea Party in the HOUSE
43 WON AR-1 Rick Crawford AR-2 Tim Griffin AZ-1 Paul Gosar AZ-5 David Schweikert FL-2 Steve Southerland FL-22 Allen West FL-24 Sandra Adams GA-9 Tom Graves ID-1 Raul Labrador IL-10 Robert Dold IL-11 Adam Kinzinger IL-14 Randy Hultgren IL-17 Bobby Schilling IL-8 Joe Walsh IN-3 Marlin Stutzman IN-9 Todd Young LA-3 Jeff Landry MI-1 Dan Benishek MI-3 Justin Amash MI-7 Tim Walberg MN-6 Michelle Bachmann MO-4 Vicky Hartzler NC-2 Renee Ellmers NH-1 Frank Guinta NV-3 Joe Heck NY-13 Michael Grimm NY-20 Christopher Gibson NY-25 Ann Marie Buerkle OH-1 Steve Chabot OH-15 Steven Stivers OH-16 Jim Renacci OH-6 Bill Johnson SC-1 Tim Scott SC-3 Jeff Duncan SC-4 Trey Gowdy SC-5 Mick Mulvaney TN-4 Scott DesJarlais TX-17 Bill Flores TX-27 Blake Farenthold VA-9 H. Morgan Griffith WI-7 Sean Duffy WI-8 Reid Ribble WV-1 David McKinley
87 LOST AR-4 Beth Anne Rankin AZ-4 Janet Contreras AZ-7 Ruth McClung AZ-8 Jesse Kelly CA- 11 David Harmer CA-10 Gary Clift CA-16 Daniel Sahagun CA-18 Michael Berryhill CA-23 Tom Watson CA-27 Mark Reed CA-29 John Colbert CA-30 Charles Wilkerson CA-37 Star Parker CA-43 Scott Folkens CA-47 Van Tran CA-5 Paul A. Smith CA-51 Nick Popaditch CA-6 Jim Judd CA-7 Rick Tubbs CA-8 John Dennis CA-9 Gerald Hashimoto CT-3 Jerry Labriola DE-1 Glen Urquhart FL-3 Michael Yost GA-4 Lisbeth "Liz" Carter GA-5 Fenn Little HI-1 Charles Djou HI-2 John Willoughby IL-12 Teri Newman IL-5 David Ratowitz IL-9 Joel Pollak IN-1 Mark Leyva IN-2 Jackie Walorski KY-3 Todd Lally MA-1 Bill Gunn MA-10 Jeff Perry MA-2 Tom Wesley MA-3 Marty Lamb MA-4 Sean Bielat MA-7 Gerry Dembrowski MD-4 Robert Broadus MD-5 Charles Lollar ME-2 Jason Levesque MI-12 Don Volaric MI-13 John Hauler MI-15 Rob Steele MI-9 Rocky Raczkowski MO-3 Ed Martin MO-5 Jacob Turk MS-2 Bill Marcy NC-11 Jeff Miller NC-13 William Randall NC-4 William Lawson NC-8 Harold Johnson NJ-1 Dale Glading NJ-6 Anna Little NJ-8 Roland Straten NM-1 Jonathan Barela NM-3 Tom Mullins NY-17 Anthony Mele NY-2 John Gomez NY-21 Theodore Danz NY-22 George Phillips NY-27 Leonard Roberto NY-28 Jill Rowland NY-5 James Milano OH-10 Peter Corrigan OH-13 Tom Ganley OH-17 Jim Graham OH-9 Rich Iott OR-3 Delia Lopez OR-4 Art Robinson PA-12 Tim Burns PA-14 Melissa Haluszczak PA-4 Keith Rothfus SC-6 Jim Pratt TN-9 Charlotte Bergmann TX-20 Clayton Trotter TX-25 Donna Campbell TX-28 Bryan Underwood TX-30 Stephen Broden UT-2 Morgan Philpot VA-11 Keith Fimian VA-3 Chuck Smith VT-1 Paul Beaudry WA-1 James Watkins WA-2 John Koster
Hey, Ross Perot only took 19% in 1992, and Teddy Roosevelt only gained 28% in 1912. Smells like victory, right?
Well, it smells like something, alright. As with the Senate, the surface numbers are inflated because we are not looking at the races where the Tea Party never made it to, or past the primary.
There were 43 Tea Party wins, true, but in 2010 there were a total of 435 House seats up for a vote. Tea Party candidates took just a hair's width less than 10% of those seats.
The Tea Party success is overinflated. They are not even a true third party, just a faction withing the Republican tent, but like Conservatives have done for years, they assume every win, no matter how small, to be a overwhelming mandate for their lunatic policies. Props to that philosophy - with this strategy, they seem to get exactly what they want from every negotiation. I'm being generous by calling this behavior a strategy - it assumes they know they have no mandate, but realize that to get what they want, they have to act as if the world agrees with them, and is encouraging them (my fear is that this behavior is less a "strategy" and more a "delusion").
Maybe, just maybe, the Dems should stop trying to adopt rightwing policies, and adopt rightwing strategy. We hold the Senate and the Presidency, and our poll numbers are superior to theirs.
Can we act like we own the whole damned world, and start getting a little bit of what Progressives want?
Pretty Please?
|