Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So what do we do with guys in political events carrying guns? nt

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:21 AM
Original message
So what do we do with guys in political events carrying guns? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Laugh and keep our eyes open. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tell them to stay the hell out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zoeisright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kick them out and watch them as they leave.
Or arrest them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mark Maker Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Who should arrest them and for what?
Offending your sensibilities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Escort them out for being a public hazard.
Remember when Cindy was arrested for wearing a t-shirt?

Surely an unsecured gun at a political event is as dangerous as her shirt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Society will make them pariahs.
It will happen all by itself.


Most people in this country do not like to be bullied by the implied violence.


Nor do they like the idea of armed political parties.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. Well said. 'Armed political parties' reminds me of the Nazis nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. If someone showed up tonight at the memorial service, would they have been
able to turn them away? Does a metal detector even serve a purpose if it's legal to carry concealed weapons?

My sister-in-law and I were discussing this tonight. She said no way would they let an armed person in there, I said that seemed right, but armed people were allowed to attend other events where the President was present.

Does anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. The armed civilans were never allowed close enough to become a danger
Edited on Thu Jan-13-11 01:46 AM by guruoo
to the President. And I'm sure even the ones outside the perimeter were
assigned their own special Presidential host to watch over them, and assure that their visit
was a peaceful one.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. I'm sure you're right. Like those men and women don't have enough to do! Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. The Secret Service isn't going to allow anyone
Who is armed within close proximity to the President. They can prohibit firearms within a venue where the President is speaking. They can't, however, prohibit people within a geographical region like a city block.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. That's what my sister-in-law guessed -- it's different when it's an inside venue. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Didn't they do exactly that at Bush's inaugurals?
DC looked like an armed camp with people in cages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. For his second
Inauguration, they had protesters behind wire fences because of the problems they encountered with people throwing bottles and stuff at his limousine during the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
40. Potus surrounded by "Special" security zone
All these events where the president speaks are designated to come under special security zone law. Entering that temporary security zone is like walking into the Whitehouse lawn. Federal law supersedes and the carrying of firearms is only allowed by officials designated by the SS. (e.g. They can choose to allow local PD to keep their guns but are not required to do so.)

Those nuts carrying their guns outside campaign stops were actually quite a ways away. Try volunteering for an event like the DNC and see just how big that security zone is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Stand next to them with large signs with an arrow pointing to the gun
toter and in large letters, "This man has a tiny wiener"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
36. Excellent! And for women?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. A sign that says, "Her gun makes her butt look big."
Sorry. If we're playing with stereotypes I thought we should be "fair and balanced." :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Keep an eye out, but nothing else.
They want a confrontation; so why give it to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Because not confronting these people is not working. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. There's no point in confronting them unless the law prohibits it,
I agree with you. Guns should not be allowed anywhere near elected officials. Our best recourse is trying to change the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:58 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Bush kicked people out of his events for the bumperstickers on their parked cars.
Not that I'd want Obama to do that but there has to be a reasonable middle ground. Guns have no place at political gatherings, whether there are elected officials there or not.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
14. We obey the local laws, just as they might be doing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bring more guns of our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. That's the spirit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. It's a damned if you do and damned if you don't situation.
I'm all for 2nd Amendment rights, and 1st Amendment rights, but I was always taught that with 1st Amendment rights, you still cannot threaten people that you'll hurt them, because that is called communicating threats. I was also taught that you don't go brandishing a gun unless you mean to use it, and you don't use it on people unless it is in self defense and you know you have no other choice.

These thugs doing all this at political events are bullies, nothing more, nothing less. They are abusing the 2nd Amendment and the 1st Amendment at the same time. Those amendments are not there to give them the right to threaten and bully people, but our government does nothing to stop them. When it comes to bullying and threatening, that should be "the line." Period. Everything else is negotiable (target shooting, CC, hunting, etc.)

What they are doing at these political events, at one time, was against the law. I don't think that law changed, but something made our government quit enforcing that law. I don't know why. It's terrorism. Plain and simple. I have a gut feeling our government is allowing it because they want to keep the atmosphere fearful and, well, terrorized, to make sure the mass lemmings that go along to get along will keep supporting the wars for profit. I really do think that is why they are allowing this crap to go on. They want to make sure, by any means necessary, they can keep the populace afraid and fearful, so they can keep on with the wars and keep on with the Big Brother crap they are doing (slowly eroding all our other rights.)

Personally, I'm sick of it. I don't think it's too much to ask that people with CC permits not have a gun within 1000 feet of schools, churches, political events, and other events that have large crowds of people. Arizona had some of the most lenient gun control laws out there, but look what happened anyhow. Lot of good their lenient gun control laws did that day.

That is why, even though I know President Obama is in a tough situation and has to say that we should work for a child like view/world of politics, where everyone believes wholeheartedly in the American dream, etc., it is just not a reasonable request. The reality is, there are thugs controlling everything no matter who is in our government and most of what our government has been doing for the last 10 years or so is pure out and out fascism making itself comfy in America.

If it keeps up at this rate, America will either become the next Nazi Germany type country or fold and collapse. Neither one of those prospects looks appealing at all to me.

It's too late to request that we go back to that whole American pride/nationalism frame of mind. There's nothing left to be proud of. Post 9/11 America is the fucked up alter ego ghost of the America that once was. Our innocence is gone. Our rights are gone. Our hope is gone.

Unless the "childlike" view of politics means looking at it from inside our bedrooms due to being grounded all the time, that idea of making American politics like a little girl would like for it to be, is impossible. It is absolutely impossible. Reality makes it impossible. With our new political reality as of right now, the bottom line is that the first rule of being a Democrat in America is to expect to possibly be assassinated, whether by bombs or bullets by either unstable people influenced by right wingers, hate groups, or right wingers too hopped up on conspiracy theories. Either way, the Democratic Party has been given marching orders to either belly up and wet ourselves like the beta dogs we have been made to be, or assist in our own demise, and in turn assist in America's demise.

In other words, we are hosed now matter how you look at it.

That's just my $0.02 worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. The fact one would feel the need

To carry a gun into a political event tells me they think of politics as violent war.

Haven't we progressed passed that?

Yea I get it, "my 2nd amendment rights", but I don't grab my P-38 when I drive down to Subway to eat, so why would I need it to go to a political rally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. I don't understand how this is even legal
When I was protesting outside a dinner Raygun was at the police made us discard the sticks that we were using to hold our signs. Why can you have a gun and not a sign with a stick??? :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
25. As long as the liberal hippy-types are well fenced off, there's no prob.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
26. They get a thrill from the attention. I think if you ignore them,
they'll go away from the political events. They aren't there to hear Democratic candidates anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
28. airport-level security
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. Publicly ridicule them at the time.
That's my suggestion. Call them out for their paranoia on the spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Agreed. I've no problem at all with shaming silly adults. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. I've done it. The funny thing is that the gun-toters in such situations
are in a very precarious position. They don't dare let their anger get the best of them, so it's possible to point out the ridiculousness of their little demonstration without worrying about the firearm on their belt. They may get angry, but they can't act on that anger in any way, for fear of arrest. Someone is always keeping an eye on these morons at political events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. Nothing? How many people did they harm? Oh yeah 0.
If someone intends harm they likely aren't going to a rally with a gun in plain sight they will attack suddenly and without warning with concealed weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
31. I like a modified Chris Rock approach: Let them bring as many firearms as they can carry...
...but confiscate every magazine and round of ammunition they have with them (which can be returned after the event, of course). It would be interesting to see how many of them would be willing to stuff a live cartridge up their butt just to smuggle it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
32. Really bright spotlights.
Somebody wants to be seen, well by gawd let's accomodate him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. Surround them with people wearing "I'm With Stupid" teeshirts /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Excellent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-13-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
35. Call them out, and point out the spectacle they are making of themselves. Public humiliation used
to be a punishment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC