Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC: OWS "hundreds strong" and "have not reached the political strength of the Tea Party."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:12 PM
Original message
ABC: OWS "hundreds strong" and "have not reached the political strength of the Tea Party."
Oy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. "political strength" = "cash donations"
Well, yea, billionaires are not in the 99%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. That is the kind of rot we're fighting against...
and why ABC/NBC/CBS should be the first to lose their broadcasting licenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. To be replaced with what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. something accountable.
would be what.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Such as?
How about making these networks acountable? You can't blow everything up. You do need to leave foundations to build on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Nope. They had their chance, and they blew it.
Time to give someone else a turn at bat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Maybe things work that way for Uncle Hugo. But here
Not so much. You don't get to silence media outlets you dislike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's fraud, a.k.a. as infotainment billed as 'news'
so there's an argument to be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. There is no argument. We don't use the power of government to silence opponents.
The government doesn't get editorial control over content. These should be very simple concepts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's not about opponents. It's about the truth.
you need to move beyond political parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So who shall be the Government's Official Arbiter of Truth?
Edited on Sun Oct-02-11 07:06 PM by tritsofme
How about in the next Republican administration?

The First Amendment can be very frustrating to those with an authoritarian streak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. You're proposing your own strawman, then knocking it down
Edited on Sun Oct-02-11 07:22 PM by ixion
which is unimpressive. Corporations are not individuals, hence the whole First Amendment thing is a Red Herring in this case. These corporations are using the airwaves owned by We, the People, though. So at the end of the day, that's who they need to be accountable to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Someone who can fucking count.
Don't be disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. +1. The last time I checked, the First Admendment was still in effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. These media types
aren't too good at arithmetic, are they? Last night NBC evening news covered OWS pretty well. I was shocked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. Says the Tea Party media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gee, I guess they should have just been the Republican Party in the first place...
and astroturfed themselves into a pretend third-party movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. sounds like a true statement. modest size crowds do not equal political influence to the degree that
the tea baggers have, which is hijacking a political party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. 700 OWS arrested yesterday. You couldn't get 700 Teabaggers together if you had to.
There aren't 700 of them left in the country that aren't on somebody's payroll to be one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. is that the opinion of ABC? they would never support a progressive movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. seriously? they're supposed to have reached the political strength of the tea party already?
Patience, ABC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. in reality, I believe they've surpassed the lame tea baggers
but it will have to surpass it by several orders of magnitude before the'll admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Let's see... 1K expected for TeaCon in Chicago this weekend... compared to
700 arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge while hundreds others made it to the pedestrian bridge. Tea party has been organized for several years (with corporate sponsors such as 1% funded Freedom works), while the OWS has been in existence for barely a month. ABC has no sense of literary foreshadowing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. of course they haven't
they don't own the media in this fucked up country.
gawd DAMN that pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. the Va Pilot had an article about the OWS (back page) and
it mentioned that is is not going away...but is "growing" and even though it appears disorganized...the thinking is...the groundwork is being created for something much larger across the country...

I found it encouraging!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. Some R shill on Hardball the other day compared the Tea Party to organized labor ...
Last I heard, there were tens of millions of union members in this country. The Tea Party? Not quite so many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Yea, it sucks not having the financial backing of Dick Armey and Freedomworks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC