Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In four days it will be October 7, 2011

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:12 PM
Original message
In four days it will be October 7, 2011
That will mark ten fucking years in Afghanistan.

Ten

Fucking

Years.

There is some bullshit weasel talk about some bullshit, half-assed "withdrawal" in maybe a year or so. No one is committing. In that face of that, the Marine general who is the head honcho du jour over there says "not so fast. We're gunna be here a loooong time."

Ten

Fucking

Years.

Happy Anniversary, George.



Nice follow through, Barack.



Can *anyone* tell me why we're still there? What's the objective?









Does no one recall the fate of the Soviet Union?

Does no one have an appreciation of eons of Afghan history with respect to invading armies? Those guys NEVER lose.

How are we paying for this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. we're there because that is the neocon agenda
and nothing has changed, as far as that goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PETRUS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. funny how certain...
...neocons and neoliberal globalists appeal to different segments of the electorate here at home, then behave remarkably similarly outside of our borders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
$$$$ is the only thing I can think of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are trying to support the puppet government so it won't be overrun as soon as we leave


but since they don't want us to leave they are dragging their feet




I'm sure the withdrawal will be next summer, as the election heats up but not so close to election day as to be obviously politically motivated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. I got this one, and it's easy. $1 trillion worth of minerals.
Perhaps we didn't invade for that reason, but we're staying for that reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Plenty of people have been skeptical about the 'bonanza' from the beginning
http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/06/14/say_what_afghanistan_has_1_trillion_in_untapped_mineral_resources

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/06/16/fp-junk-science-week-afghan-mineral-bonanza-is-bogus/

Haven't heard as much about it recently. But the timing of the story was a little suspect, as it appeared right when there was a lot of bad news coming out of Afghanistan. It's been argued that it was floated as a reason to stay. I don't know what the truth is myself. What I do know is that the time it takes to make any real money off of it will be a lot longer than the US public has patience to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drew Richards Donating Member (507 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Actually the Afghani gov already signed deals for min extraction to China and Russian..US doesnt get
shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. We are there to stop the development of pipelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. We've been in Iraq since 1991.
Think about that for a second. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. The only thing we make is War. It's a trillion dollar business...and business is good
for the war pigs. It took less than half this time to defeat Germany and Japan, but somehow a handful of disorganized... Oh what the hell, we're in the back pockets of the Military Industrislists and Obama doesn't dare stand up to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. WWII was also total war
And we had Allies (one of which, the USSR, did most of the real fighting and dying against the Germans) who were also fully mobilized. A fully mobilized US with allies would have 'won' the Iraq and Afghan Wars a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. you can bet the super congress will take a token 'chunk' of war money
war is a criminal enterprise

now with petreaus running the cia we can have perpetual war.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. You are leaving out all the years we supplied Bin Laden with
arms to fight the Soviet Union.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
13. Evidently, Afghanistan has lots of minerals and other resources.
And of course, the person the CIA trained and provided weapons to fight the Soviet invasion was Osama Bin Laden.

Afghanistan is poison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. What happens if we leave?
Taliban restrictions and mistreatment of women include the:

1- Complete ban on women's work outside the home, which also applies to female teachers, engineers and most professionals. Only a few female doctors and nurses are allowed to work in some hospitals in Kabul.

2- Complete ban on women's activity outside the home unless accompanied by a mahram (close male relative such as a father, brother or husband).

3- Ban on women dealing with male shopkeepers.

4- Ban on women being treated by male doctors.

5- Ban on women studying at schools, universities or any other educational institution. (Taliban have converted girls' schools into religious seminaries.)

6- Requirement that women wear a long veil (Burqa), which covers them from head to toe.

7- Whipping, beating and verbal abuse of women not clothed in accordance with Taliban rules, or of women unaccompanied by a mahram.

8- Whipping of women in public for having non-covered ankles.

9- Public stoning of women accused of having sex outside marriage. (A number of lovers are stoned to death under this rule).

10- Ban on the use of cosmetics. (Many women with painted nails have had fingers cut off).

11- Ban on women talking or shaking hands with non-mahram males.

12- Ban on women laughing loudly. (No stranger should hear a woman's voice).

More: http://www.rawa.org/rules.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. That is a fair criticism. The only problem is, what does our presence achieve
Stopping this from happening In the long run?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Time changes things. Give Muslim women a chance!
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 12:50 AM by ellisonz
Who two years ago could have predicted that Ben Ali, Mubarak, and Gaddafi would be gone? That Syria would be in the throes of a Revolution. I think our foreign policy in this regard is to act in the interest of moderate or secular society. To shield them from the worst abuse that could be heaped.

I think a compelling argument could be made too that if we pull out entirely Pakistan could be destabilized and that could result in a regional war.

We have to change our strategy. Opium production is the biggest thing sustaining the Taliban resistance. I do not know why we haven't more aggressively attempted to co-opt production by buying up the crop and putting it to better use or destroyed. The cost of doing so would be minimal to military action and would severely disrupt worldwide heroin distribution. The Bush administration was incompetent in addressing this issue. Eventually, this would allow use to create a different cash crop - article on saffron production: http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1068856.html

Some background:

With the Taliban now controlling large swaths of Afghanistan, traffickers and their networks pay the militants as much as $500 million a year, according to U.S. and U.N. intelligence estimates, to grow and protect the poppy fields, smuggle the drugs and run sophisticated processing labs and drug bazaars in Afghanistan and neighboring countries.
Ads by Google

Similar drug trafficking activity is flourishing in the tribal belt that includes northwestern Pakistan, and it is providing huge amounts of cash to the Pakistani Taliban and possibly Al Qaeda, the officials said.

"We see their involvement through just about every stage of drug trafficking, and in each of the four corners of Afghanistan," Thomas Harrigan, deputy administrator and chief of operations for the DEA, said of the Taliban. "They use the money to sustain their operations, feed their fighters, to assist Al Qaeda."

----

Richard C. Holbrooke, the U.S. special representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan, told Congress in June that the Obama administration was redirecting resources that lawmakers had appropriated for opium eradication toward the new strategy of "interdiction, rule of law -- going after the big guys. And those involve people in the government."

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jul/20/world/fg-dea-afghan20


We need smarter guys in the room. Simply trying to kill the bad guys isn't solving the problem. We need to defend the population and allow the people of Afghanistan to take ownership of their country.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Afghanistan has shown for centuries that it will not be occupied
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 06:27 AM by ixion
so our mission their is futile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. History does not repeat itself inexoriably.
Edited on Tue Oct-04-11 03:24 PM by ellisonz
Humans make history.

Afghanistan is not some monolith. It is a nation - with real people who are not identical to one another in thought or action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. That is currently occupied by a hostile nation
so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
17. K and R (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC