|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 05:56 AM Original message |
Wisconsin: Fee waiver pushed for copies of birth certificates (needed for voter ID) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Evasporque (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 06:12 AM Response to Original message |
1. But there will be no voter disenfranchisement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #1 |
10. keywords...."after 2012 election.." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 06:15 AM Response to Original message |
2. Wisconsin should do what Ohio is doing. They gathered signitures to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 06:33 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. I'm not sure our Constitution allows such a referendum in Wisconsin. Anyone? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 07:21 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. here`s two from google |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 07:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Doesn't sound like we can initiate a binding referendum... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 07:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. i think the feds can get involved since it will be a federal election |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 08:05 AM Response to Original message |
7. the unions could pitch in and make sure no one is denied.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scuba (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 08:39 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. They can and will, but shouldn't have to do so. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-04-11 08:49 AM Response to Original message |
9. It smacks of a poll tax, which has long been declared unconstitutional. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:42 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC