Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New FOIA docs reveal smoking gun regarding State Department bias

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:11 PM
Original message
New FOIA docs reveal smoking gun regarding State Department bias
Source: FOIA

We have received a new round of documents from the State Department in response to our Freedom of Information Act request. These documents are deeply disturbing in that they provide definitive evidence of pro-pipeline bias and complicity at the State Department -- including one “smoking gun” email in which State Department employee Marja Verloop literally cheers “Go Paul!” for pipeline lobbyist Paul Elliott after he announces TransCanada has secured Senator Max Baucus' support for the pipeline.

Read more: http://www.foe.org/new-foia-docs-reveal-smoking-gun-regarding-state-department-bias



POOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Every American should wake up about this Major Steenking BoonDoggle Pipeline
...and ROAR out demands to shitcan it.

This latest news just runs the shitheap up another few freaking reeking meters higher. The shitheap was already way beyond Himilayan Levels...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. We pay taxes so people like Verloop worry about this crap on our behalves
because we have day jobs. Or, at least, the luckiest of us have day jobs.

That's why we have a federal government, to protect us.

Any federal employee who does not do that should be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. More skeeze...
*sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Max Baucus!
:puke: :puke: :puke: And this guy is one of the 12 committee members. Why Obama put him on the committee...I'll never know! He's a Dino if there ever was one. He'll vote against Dems if he'll gain politically. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. just one of many who need to be primaried n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-03-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Keystone emails spark fresh controversy
Source: The Canadian Press

Emails between a senior diplomat at the U.S. Embassy in Ottawa and the chief lobbyist for Calgary's TransCanada suggest a friendly relationship as the company tries to win approval from the U.S. State Department for its Keystone XL pipeline.

"Go Paul!" read one email written a year ago from Marja Verloop, a State Department employee working in Ottawa on energy and environmental matters, to Paul Elliott, the lobbyist who was a key figure in Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's failed presidential bid in 2008.

The emails were released Monday following a freedom-of-information request from Friends of the Earth, an environmental group that says correspondence between Elliott and State Department officials proves the approval process for the pipeline is hopelessly corrupt.



Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/story/2011/10/03/keystone-transcanada-emails.html



Oct 3, 2011 2:15 PM MT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-04-11 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. So, was Verloop fired? Were other biased employees?
And WHY is she biased? Did she stand to profit? Or is the administration as a whole biased?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC