Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama: The American people see not everybody is following the rules. Wall Street

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:28 AM
Original message
Obama: The American people see not everybody is following the rules. Wall Street
is an example.

:thumbsup:

(From his presser going on now.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good! Keep it up Mr. President....
I want to hear more of that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justiceischeap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, Wall St. is an example, another example would be Congress
but hey, what do I know, I'm not one of the 1% and I like Apple products (which, apparently makes me evil).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's been straight about the Congress, too - good showing.
And I'm an Apple SNOB, so I'm more evil than you! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PragmaticLiberal Donating Member (169 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama: (and I'm paraphrasing) I put my butt on the line to stabilize the financial industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. turn 'stabilize' to 'enable' and you get truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. So why, then, have there been no prosecutions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You can't prosecute for immorality, only for law breaking nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So the "rules" he was referring to are moral rules not legal rules?
When you say someone isn't following the rules, I don't think people mean by that moral rules. I think they mean rules which require sanction by an enforcing body.

If you are playing a card game and accuse someone of not playing by the rules, you don't mean it as a moral offense. You mean it as doing something which you cannot legitimately do in cards and that you must stop or leave the game.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. If there were legal grounds I'm sure we'd know about it by now
I don't recall reading that there are legal grounds to prosecute though I read the Goldman Sachs CEO was lawyering up.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. You're sure we would know about it? Really? Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. The cynicism has no bottom.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-11 11:03 AM by kenny blankenship
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Oh my fucking god.
Edited on Thu Oct-06-11 11:13 AM by woo me with science
"If there were legal grounds I'm sure we'd know about it by now."

You do realize that our dear Third Way President has been pressuring state attorneys general for settlements that allow the banks to avoid any current and future criminal investigations, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. Look forward, dumb man!
Sets a precedent for every crime to be ignored because it's 'past'.

Well, only if you're already rich... like having shares in for-profit prisons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Unfortunately we have been removing the laws that regulate banking
and wall street for the last 30 years. Are there any laws for them anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. He answered that. The financial community is very clever and
knows how to get around the rules. They were immoral, not necessarily illegal.

Didn't you hear him say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emcguffie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes he said it, but that's just a dodge. That's what I think.
Because, although the environment was much looser than before the Glass-Steagall Act was dumped, financial institutions did break rules. They did break laws. It may have been the loosening of laws that started the whole shebang, but when things got going, according to some attorneys general, laws were certainly broken and fraud was perpetrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's the same excuse Dimson gave for not getting bin Laden ...
... he's a tricky bugger, sneaky, clever ... or in other words I'm not looking for him.
Same with this POTUS and the Wall Street terrorists, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Investigate. Do the work. Bring your results back to DU. Until you do there
is no way to argue this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. DU is a DISCUSSION BOARD. Full of OPINIONS.
And I am entitled to mine. Correct? Until it's something else, bite me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Exactly. If laws have been broken the Administration must follow the law and prosecute.
The fault is with the bankers if they have committed fraud. But if the President's Justice Dept. doesn't prosecute these crimes, then the fault is with him equally.

If no laws were broken because the laws now allow fraud (the escape clause of the centrist cynics), then the fault is with a corrupt political system, and a people who refuse to act accordingly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. Can you tell us who broke what law? No one here seems to know nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Kinda hard to find out
when your President is actively pushing for settlements to allow the banks to avoid criminal inquiries.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. Accounting Control Fraud has occurred when bank officials mislead shareholders & regulators
regarding the capitalization of their banks and their risk of exposure to loss. When bank CEOs forge ahead with loan underwriting for mortgages for which the borrower frequently has no demonstrated income to pay back the loan, and then sell these mortgages to suckers, representing them as safe as government securities, through some forumla that they can't explain even to themselves, they are committing fraud. They aren't just being incompetent at their jobs, but instead pushing growth of lending in the short run, ignoring the inevitable defaults in the long run, for the sake of their next quarter's bonus. When CEOs leverage their banks' deposits against derivative instruments that they can't explain but which expose them to potentially astronomical losses, they are again committing accounting control fraud, misrepresenting the risk their institutions are exposed to.

Somehow the Dept of Justice of Ronald Reagan, of all people, was able to do what the Obama Administration can't bring itself to do. It prosecuted S&L CEOs for accounting control fraud. The Congress wrote and Regan signed a law to make it easier for executive branch agencies to deal with criminally run banks with appropriate force and quickness.

The Prompt Corrective Action law ( USC Title 12, 1831
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/12/usc_sec_12_00001831---o000-.html should have been invoked by the Obama Administration if it cared about following the law and ending the reign of corruption. But Obama would rather go down in history as an accomplice than a reformer. The cesspool awaits and will claim its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Courtesy Flush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. They don't always break laws
They don't need to. They write the laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
24. Throw them in prison, anyway. No tears from the 99% will be shed. nt
Edited on Thu Oct-06-11 11:14 AM by Modern_Matthew
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Dear President Obama, you're part of the problem
or don't you get that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. Too bad Obama's Attorney General Eric Holder can't see it.
Where are the perp walks Mr President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. That is, shall we say, an understatement so gross
as to be laughable. It would be far easier to list the people on Wall $treet who obeyed any rules. To suggest that the Great Implosion is the work of a few "bad apples" is absurd. The thievery and fraud was systemic from top to bottom.

Nice way to cover the asses of your wealthy buddies, Mr. President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
26. I am fucking sick of words that say one thing
and actions that do the opposite.

At least the Republicans are up front about fucking you over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-06-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
27. So why didn't he/isn't he prosecuting?
More empty words and NO ACTION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC