Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The President said, "We worked hard to negotiate this deal"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:30 AM
Original message
The President said, "We worked hard to negotiate this deal"
Who does he mean "We"??

From what I have read, he never even informed Congress about it. Unlike the healthcare reform bill, he shut them totally out.

Who did he send to negotiate? Can you guess?

He totally dissed the Congress. Perhaps it shows his superior bent from being in the US Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. He was talking about himself and the republicans
Why would we need anyone else??

You really need to pay more attention

:hide: :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. He'll shut out anyone who won't see things his way
He may have included Congress in the "health care" debate - but he shut out single payer advocates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Joe Biden was the negotiator. And I've never seen anything that suggested
that Harry and Nancy were completely in the dark about what was going on--just complaints from Mary Landrieu and some in the House Caucus that Obama didn't meet with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Even the health insurance bill was largely a deal cut by the WH...
...early on, though members of Congress didn't realize it at the time.

And when reconciliation was finally used, the bill was not strengthened as it could have been at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Should not have negotiated with the repukes at all...
Edited on Thu Dec-16-10 11:35 AM by and-justice-for-all
but that's is what ya get for negotiating with terrorist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. The deal was negotiated to pass the Senate
The President knows where House Democrats stand. The fact is that some Democrats in the Senate support the estate tax deal, which was sponsored by Lincoln and included in the Democratic packages that failed.

Here are the 15 Democrats who voted against Sanders' amendment to the package (they likely all support he estate tax provision). Roll Call:

Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Casey (D-PA)
Hagan (D-NC)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Manchin (D-WV)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Udall (D-CO)
Webb (D-VA)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. It was a conflict over strategy
Pelosi et. al. were "invited" to participate in negotiations with the GOP senate, but basically turned them down because they didn't want to proceed that way. They wanted to have the confrontation. Obama didn't want to have the confrontation so he proceeded without the House and just presented it to them as a fait a compli. More than one source has suggested that the final bill ended up being vastly more "conservative" because of Nancy's choice. Hard to tell from the outside, since these negotiations weren't exactly "transparent". We'll see now if the house makes any changes, and where they are. That might be an indication of what their contribution would have been, or it may merely be an indication that Pelosi still wants the fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. That's because the tax deal is only about one thing
His re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The truth finally emerges.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. You post good stuff nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Just as the health insurance deal was about campaign contributions...
If you doubt it, read Taibbi's Griftopia. It's sickening but the truth often is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Amen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. That's interesting
It will both destroy his Presidency and reassure his election?

Which is it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Well, HE thinks it will ensure his re-election
"Move to the center, capture moderate votes, the left has nowhere else to go, blah, blah, blah." We'll see, won't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. I don't give a flying fuck about Obama or his future
I care about what happens to the rest of America. This tax deal will screw us for decades to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
11. Hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Are you getting paid for that commercial?
Just curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Boy, that would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Also. Why could Obama do nothing about DADT? ("It's up to Congress!!!")
For two years all I have heard about is how Obama has NOTHING to do with repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell because, why, Congress has to act! Obama could do nothing but sit in his lonely Oval Office playing Bedazzled on the computer, waiting. Waiting for a bill to sign! :cry:

Yet, here he negotiated a deal with the GOP and it's fine with the loyal and true. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Blaming Congress is lame when you also give Obama credit for their work
and then ignore the deals he cuts and then forces them to comply with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. oy -- i'm sure he was just tuckered after all that 'hard work'.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. WE are his new BFF...the rethuglicans...he is speaking now and
I can't listen anymore....I mute the sound like I did for shrub...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. yeah -- i won't listen to him anymore either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
23. Geithner negotiated the deal..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. He's a Superiorite!!1!
A Superiorist.

Disser Superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
25. How hard he or anyone else worked is irrelevant -- the deal should be shot down.
That he might have worked hard on it is just an indictment against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
27. Have you ever had a pet bring a carcass to your feet?
They're proud of it, and you're thinking "ewwwwwwww!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. "Hard work" was Dumbya's favorite catch phrase.
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama didn't keep House and Senate Democrats out .... they ran away ...
The Dems in the House and Senate needed to have the stones to stand and fight this BEFORE the mid-terms because that is when they had leverage.

Instead, they decided to hold symbolic votes in the lame duck session when they had ZERO LEVERAGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. I'm sure he will not veto everything the repukes come up with for the next 2 years...
...got to reach across the aisle and all that shit. May he will form a new party called Centrists and be it's first primary candidate. He damn sure won't be winning the Dem ticket in 2012.

Kucinich/Grayson 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-16-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. Congress could have negotiated it at any point in the past year. They punted.
It was either Obama negotiates or no bill gets passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC