m$nbc covering voter fraud!!

[babylonsister]

:wow:

Pros and cons of having to show ID with Michael Waldman from Brennan Ctr for Justice v. John Fund, editor, American Spectator.

At least they're discussing what's going on; progress! :thumbsup:

[nadinbrzezinski]

1. Something is happening here...

I think some in the msm are waking up that we are not that dumb or stuuuuuppppiiiiddd

[mod mom]

6. The evidence was there but never addressed because neither

party is willing to give up control. This is just a teaser so they can say they've covered it. If it was going to go somewhere, it would have happened just after Obama got elected, we controlled both house and he had the people behind him. Instead they ignored it.

I remember working so hard so the truth would be exposed. I would love to hear what John Conyers (who was the recipient and archivist of the evidence) has to say why it was never addressed.

[nadinbrzezinski]

8. You know it is bad when the best expose was in the excelsior

a mexican paper... yup, translated the whole bloody mess and sent it to conyers... three pages, eight colums wide.

but what is happening here has to do with OWS... and a few other things... there is something 'appening 'ere and they are starting to lose control.

[mod mom]

11. He had evidence from attorneys who lead investigations

into BOE before Blackwell et al had ballots destroyed (despite a judges order). Going into a BOE ballot warehouse and documenting paperwork is no fun endeavor. It is infuriating that it was ignored.

I worked my ass off for change. I closed my business of 17 years to work for this change-NOT more of the same. I'll only work for progressive candidates this time. When OFA called I told them exactly that and that although I was leaning towards voting for Obama, I was so disappointed that I was holding out to see if someone better suited to my progressive agenda entered the field. I'm beyond scare tactics saying vote D or else. Or else what? A kinder face to corporatism? I want change.

This isn't what I worked for:




Obama nominates Republican recommendations for open U.S. attorney positions in Utah and Texas

In yet another bow to the party that didn't vote for him, President Obama has been nominating a number of U.S. attorneys recommended by Republican legislators and opposed by Democrats (h/t AMERICAblog commenter keysdan for this story).

Let's start with MainJustice.com (my emphasis everywhere; I also closed up several one-sentence paragraphs, cause you know, this isn't the sports):
The Barack Obama administration will consider another Republican nomination for a U.S. Attorney position – the latest case of the Democratic administration deferring to Republican-recommended appointees.

The Obama administration is vetting David Barlow, currently the legal counsel to Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), for potential appointment as U.S. Attorney for Utah, the Salt Lake Tribute reported.

-snip
http://www.americablog.com/2011/09/obama-nominates-republican.html?m=1

BTW I realize that article is from Sept but it came into my box just last evening.

[nadinbrzezinski]

12. I know but the elites rarely move on their own

that is the sad truth.

[OneGrassRoot]

7. Or they are envisioning us occupying THEIR space if they don't find...

their integrity.

:bounce:

[nadinbrzezinski]

9. That is part of it.

[malaise]

2. Fuckie Todd is a complete tool

John Fund?
:puke:

[mfcorey1]

3. Amen! Amen!

[babylonsister]

4. Yea, I know, but Mr. Waldman is making a good case. nt

[malaise]

10. Yes he was good

:hi:

[Kahuna]

5. Chuckles says, why not have the laws just in case.....

:wtf: