Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An English professor skewers Rick Santorum.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:42 PM
Original message
An English professor skewers Rick Santorum.
Rick Santorum would deny gay and lesbian Americans the right to marry, even though the Declaration of Independence promises their right to the pursuit of happiness.

Todd Pettigrew, Associate Professor of English at Cape Breton University, deconstructs Rick Santorum's argument as follows:


Santorum begins by saying that in the USA, rights come from God and that the pursuit of happiness has been misunderstood. It doesn't mean the pursuit of what makes one pleased or content, but rather the ability to do good according to God's laws. Santorum says:

"God gives you the rights. He doesn't give them to you and says, 'Do whatever you want.' He gave them to you and said -- well, look at later on in the Declaration they refer to nature and nature's God. That we are to live by the natural law and God's laws.

"That is what when they talked about the 'pursuit of happiness.' If you go back and read the definition in Webster at the time of the Declaration, or certainly thereafter, what 'happiness' was defined as was doing good. Doing good, doing what is moral. So the pursuit of something ordered and morally good is what our founders were saying. ... "

At first it sounds like a profound insight. Words, after all, can and do change meaning ... So it's possible that happiness didn't mean then what it means now, we may all be fundamentally misreading a crucial document of American history, and Santorum has set us straight.

The problem is that even a little research shows that Santorum is simply wrong about the meaning of the word in the period. For one thing, Webster didn't publish his definitive comprehensive dictionary until 1828, more than fifty years after the Declaration was made (he did publish a smaller dictionary in 1806 but the point remains the same). So to cite Webster in this context is a historical blunder, even with Santorum's odd interjection "or certainly thereafter." Still, couldn't the larger point be valid, that the "happiness" in the pursuit of happiness did not have its modern meaning in 1776? It could be, but it's not. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, which (as humanities students know) traces the meanings of known English words over time, happiness takes on its most current meaning "the state of pleasurable content of mind" as early as 1591. So the meaning of "happiness" as we normally understand it, and as it is clearly intended in the Declaration of Independence, was already almost 200 years old by the time Jefferson and company wrote the fabled line.


Read more: http://irascibleprofessor.com/comments-10-08-11.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ah, the irascible professor!
He skewers with the best. Rick Santorum's logic (ha!) is no match for him.

Recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why bother with detailed analyses?
Santorum is an extreme homophobe who reaches for ANY reason to punish gays. He doesn't care if it doesn't make sense to an academic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sabriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's wasting his (intellectual) breath
Since when have reason and logic made any difference to these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Maybe I'm naive,
but I hope people will notice when a politician is shown to be stupid as well as evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Didn't mean to be dismissive of you
It's just that the kind of people who listen to college professors already know the Santorum is a waste of oxygen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Skewered" is the wrong word for Mr. Anal Froth
Santorum has been full of shit so many times, many regard it as a waste of their energy at this point to check before assuming he's full of shit yet again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lionel Mandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. At first I didn't know why you called him "Anal Froth"
Then I googled "Santorum", and guess what came up.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-07-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Rights DO NOT Come from God
Unless you are a king. And even then, we fought a revolution to get rid of that shit. Or, maybe just a white Christian male. Anyone else's rights have to be taken by fighting tooth and nail for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-08-11 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC