Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman May Drop Bank Status to Sidestep Volcker Rule Costs, Hilder Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 12:59 AM
Original message
Goldman May Drop Bank Status to Sidestep Volcker Rule Costs, Hilder Says
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and Morgan Stanley may consider dropping their status as bank holding companies to avoid expenses tied to the Volcker rule, said David Hilder, an analyst at Susquehanna Financial Group LLP.

The Volcker rule in its current form would impose costs on lenders and drive capital to non-bank market makers, causing the two New York-based firms to consider whether to stop being banks, Hilder said in a note yesterday, when four regulatory agencies issued a 298-page draft of the rule for public comment.

Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley were the biggest U.S. securities firms before they converted to bank holding companies after the September 2008 bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Both became subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve and won access to central bank programs such as the discount window, which are designed to protect deposit-taking banks.

“The regulators have proposed a massive new compliance burden on banks to prove that their market-making activities are just that, and not proprietary trading in disguise,” wrote Hilder, who’s based in New York. “If these regulations are adopted in anything close to their proposed form, there will be large additional costs imposed on banks as market-makers that will not apply to market-makers not owned by banks.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-12/goldman-may-drop-bank-status-to-sidestep-volcker-rule-costs-hilder-says.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The regulators have proposed a massive new compliance burden
Poor babies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SixthSense Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. how convenient
when becoming a bank holding company by purchasing a $10 million bank made them eligible for $13 billion in bailout cash

now that it is clear that the country is fed up with banker bailouts, this fiction is no longer a desirable thing

IMO their whole company ought to be put to the torch, to rid us all of an unmitigated evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cutlassmama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Seems
reasonable to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Their bank holding company status already made them more than the GDP of most countries
Of course they can dump it now.

These people are straight up thieves. They looted the Treasury, pure and simple, and they even admit it. They walk around laughing, "Well, if you're dumb enough to let us take your money, har har har."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. Watch our bought out elected leaders turn a blind eye if this happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC