Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trials Become Less Common and Acquittals Even More Rare

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:48 AM
Original message
Trials Become Less Common and Acquittals Even More Rare
Trials Become Less Common and Acquittals Even More Rare

Decades of adopting tougher sentencing laws in the U.S., including mandatory minimum sentences, have had the effect of magnifying the power of local prosecutors, who have intimidated defendants into accepting deals and avoiding trials altogether.

In 1977, one out of five federal district court criminal cases went to trial. By 2010, the ratio had dropped dramatically…to only one of 33.

The result of this dynamic has been a reduction in the number of criminal trials. While this outcome might prove to be a cost savings, critics say district attorneys have accumulated too much power within the judicial system.

...

Now there is often a sense of resentment in the judicial system against defendants who insist on going to trial, which leads to harsher sentences for those who do and then lose the verdict. Thirty years ago there was one acquittal in federal district courts for every 22 guilty pleas or trial convictions. Last year, there was only one acquittal for every 212 plea bargains or guilty verdicts.

http://www.allgov.com/Top_Stories/ViewNews/Trials_Become_Less_Common_and_Acquittals_Even_More_Rare_111012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libinnyandia Donating Member (526 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. trials
As Nixon's former attorney general said: only guilty people are arrested:o)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, The Straight Story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. And people say we are not a police state. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps modern forensics, evidence gathering, and the ease of communication
has led to more confidence in finding/arresting the culpable parties.
There's alot to be said for putting the actual guilty people into interrogation rooms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think it is the live-reality TVEE shows that do most of the work.
The COPS, MSN-LOCKUP and CSI shows have gone a LONG LONG way in programming The People correctly into fearing law and authority in general. Just look at the national crime rate...going down and down for years now, despite what your local news wants you to think.

It is true folks, TVEE programming really does work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup. If no one ever makes another cop show from now till the end of time
It'll still be too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. The federal courts around here have about a 98% conviction rate
That is remarkable.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. My son is now serving time for a first offense drug possession . . .
because of mandatory minimums and a prosecution that doesn't have to do anything because the sentencing guidelines make their work a slam dunk. The court doesn't take individual circumstances into account and it's the amount of the illegal substance that determines the charges. (14 grams of cocaine <@ 2 TBSP> = drug traffikking charge = 3 years with no possibility of parole). They offer a plea bargain for a slightly lesser charge with the possibility of parole and the defendant has little choice but to take it. Then, even if he is released on parole, his voting and driving privileges are not reinstated until the full sentence is served. This system sucks, especially since you know that those with connections and money never have to face the music.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC