Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok, ok I get it...this Iranian plot is mean to distract

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:02 PM
Original message
Ok, ok I get it...this Iranian plot is mean to distract
And came from DC.

So how much did the US government pay mexican intel?

What was the price paid to the Instituto Nacional de Migración for them to arrest patsy at the Mexico City airport and return to JFK?

Here is the deal, this was amateurish as hell. I will give this to the President of Iran. This did not come from his office. I am also willing to bet not from the pro side of the Qootz force. It was either a rogue group or quite frankly a probe. But it is real, or this is a very large conspiracy involving people from three Mexican agencies and two us agencies, if not three. (There is state too)

Will this lead to war? Nope, the saber rattling though is to be expected... And none should be shocked if Israeli and saudi intel at least talk to each other now.

But please, too large and cross national borders to be a good one. I am not even counting the third nation involved, Argentina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. My money's on BP being the source. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. BP ?
No my bet is Iranian, it is far from a unified government. There are two major factions and at least five minor ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. My money is on whoever would profit greatly from the U.S. starting a
war with Iran. The list is not short but it's not that long, either. Richard Clarke (sp?) said this was odd. I agree. Hello MIC? Is that you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Clark is not using the other possibility
What I think this was... A probe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. Or, maybe it is what they've said it is.
I understand that people tend to feel these attacks and plots are all staged to induce fear, or to open the way for war. However, I think it's a bit much to assume that every single incident is a Machiavellian ploy. There are bad and/or crazy people out there who want to harm other people. Governments wanting to harm other governments is as old as civilization.

I can't say with certainty that it was for real, but I don't assume everything's a trick, either. The world's a lousy place and, if this is as it appears, the Saudi Arabian ambassador and everyone around him escaped a terrible death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bingo...it is what it was
Amateurish but it was what it was.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. There's another explanation: a US "sting" that created something that wouldn't otherwise have
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 07:56 PM by leveymg
happened.

The amateur hour aspect of this is familiar to those of us who know the details about similar failed or foiled "terrorism" plots - the Underwear Bomber, the Times Square Bomber, the Sears Tower bomber plotters - hapless, low-level wannabe operatives who lacked the means, and in some cases the original motive, to carry out attacks that were planned, equipped, and ultimately "foiled" by US law enforcement or intelligence agencies.

It's as simple as that - if it weren't for the political types trying to turn this into an excuse to start a new series of wars.

There is zero evidence this was an official act. This is another "Underwear Bomber" case. Nobody was talking about war with Nigeria, and for good reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Actually you should read a tad into
Mexican paamilitaries.

As to us DEA inserting itself into the cartels, it goes as far back as the 1980s. A few times it's gone horribly wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. If it weren't for the DEA and US drug laws, there wouldn't be any Mexican cartels, would there?
Everyone would have to be earning an honest, peaceful living, or getting stoned and not giving a sh-t. It's been going horribly wrong since Prohibition.

When you mix the GWOT and the War on Drugs, you have two catastrophes colliding into armed chaos. But, it's stuff like this that will probably keep Congress authorizing money for this madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Oh Com'on the DEA is not responsible
Fully for all ills. I am all for legalization by the way. But I place far more onus on internal Mexican conditions for the rise of the cartels. Oh and shh the first war on drugs in Mexico was in the 1960s, well before the DEA or FBI could really openly work in Mexico...now the CIA ...let's not go there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. "now the CIA . . . let's not go there." Ding, ding . . .
Gambling in here? I'm Shocked. Shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. What that the CIA worked openly in
The 60s to crush them commies? Mexican operations against the drugs in the 60s were quite local, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. But why attack this Saudi Ambassador? He's not a member of the royal family....
...and has been described by many insiders as merely a glorified errand boy.

My two cents: this is an American home-grown attempted distraction from the revolution taking place on our own doorstep.

TERRA TERRA TERRA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Because a certain faction in iran would not mind
There is a small faction of mullahs that's been attempting to depose the house of Saud.

Not all comes from DC.

Bu I will give the Iranian president his due, this was not his doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. I agree. The Iranian President is one crazy mo-fo, but not this crazy.
And as several intelligence insiders have commented: "if the Qods want to get you, you would already be dead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Why I read this as a probe
Looking for real deniable assets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. As the church lady would say
"well that's convenient"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Convenient yes, but it does not mean it came
As origin from DC, or once again how much did they pay ?

I understand the cynicism, trust me I get it...but there are indeed bad actors ou there...and in this case my read...a probe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:14 PM
Original message
Sure -
I do agree with that. And I would bet this sort of thing happens more often than we know. Maybe this time they just decided to share since it happened and can take the news off other things ... I wouldn't assume it was some big conspiracy or that sort of thing. That's what I meant about "convenient".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think this was a probe
And I came out after the real life paramilitaries in Mexico became a reality oh around the 20th of last month, 35 bodies recovered in Veracruz killed by the mata zetas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. "And none should be shocked if Israeli and saudi intel at least talk to each other now. "
No one should be. They've been cooperating on Iran for at least 15 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. Wag the Dog.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 08:14 PM by roamer65
They want a war with Iran to distract Americans from the fact the country is going straight into the shitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. If there is a war over this I will eat my shoe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The plan is to get Iran into a war with Saudi Arabia.
Then the US and Israel will hop into defend them...mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. What do you suggest I use to cook my shoe?
By the by you think the Iranians don't want to depose the house of Saud? Is this also an American plot to finance the Qootz faction that has openly said this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Hmmm...I hope you don't hafta eat your shoe, but I suggest baked.
Israel wants into Iran REALLY bad and we will go right along with them...sadly.

I think Israel will conspire with Saudi Arabia to get in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I will not be shocked if those two work together
But war...with what army? And I mean for the us. War means a draft,yes, it is that simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. Way ahead of you ...
something me and my nephew did up a couple of years ago ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YOzMHiT5Bo :hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 05:33 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. 'Quds' faction? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulka38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. It sounds like complete kaka.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. What part? That Mexico was up to it's neck?
Edited on Wed Oct-12-11 08:59 PM by nadinbrzezinski
Or tat the us used assets it had? Or that a faction of the iranian government did the transfers? Perhaps this was cooked by rogue CIA with mi-6 for flavor, funneling money to the made up cartels...yup, that's the ticket. I get the cynicism but real conspiracies do not cross borders this way.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doublethink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Hmmm .....
CIA, Oswald, Mexico City Soviet & Cuban Embassies ... page oh about 88 to 92 of ...
http://www.amazon.com/JFK-Unspeakable-Why-Died-Matters/dp/1570757550

conspiracies don't cross borders this way ... k ... all in jest ... I know what your saying ... hugs & carry on ... no other comment ... ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Yup, and...
So how much was Mexico paid this time? Serious question.

Or you think all manichean evil plans come from dc? And yes, everybody else is clean as innocent doves?

I guess the bombing in Buenos Aires that the Iranian government carried out was CIA. I forgot, the president is our plant and on command denied the holocaust ever happened. I tell ya that CIA is incredibly agile.

:sarcasm: for those that need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. There's a shark!!! Jump! Jump! Jump!!
Really stupid and ignorant thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. How so?
Relying real world info...or all manichean evil derives from DC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
35. Even if Iran did probe us, it's nothing new in the scheme of things.
The Soviet Union routinely probed US defenses at the height of the Cold War. They would even go so far as to let their warplanes briefly dip into US air space in order to gauge US response times and watch for weaknesses in protocol. We did the same thing to them. If the US government went and reported to the media every time the Soviet Union probed the US, like it seems to be doing with this amateurish Iranian attempt at a probe, there would have been widespread support for a war in 1962 during the missile crisis, as the population would be so whipped up in fear that they'd be at risk of pulling the trigger without contemplating the full consequence of that action, and a more hawkish president than JFK would've likely been in office at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. It was probe...that's all
Somebody wanted to know how well we were covered..same in fact as printer cartridge bomb for more recent probes.

What should worry people is that Mexican paramilitaries are real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
36. Yup. It's all about distracting people of OWS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I guess the Mexican media needed the distraction too
Oh wait...there was a shooting in Saltillo and a hurricane...

No, there are real bad people in the world and not all of them are inside the beltway.

And war...what war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
39. It's A Saudi Stunt To Provoke Us Into A War With Iran
The Saudi Royal family is scared that Iran will become the dominant influence in the Middle East, and they want us to go to war with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. And there is a faction in the Iranian power structure
That wants to depose them, going back to the revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC