Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The DP Plans to slow the Korean-US Free Trade Agreement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:55 AM
Original message
The DP Plans to slow the Korean-US Free Trade Agreement
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 02:56 AM by rpannier
The ruling Grand National Party (GNP) has initiated procedures to pass a South Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA) ratification bill through the National Assembly. This move has reportedly been based on the impetus of the recent U.S. Congress’s ratification of the KORUS FTA. A hard journey is expected for the bill, however, based on the fact that the Democratic Party and other opposition parties regard the passing of the ratification bill as a question of identity that provides the key to a unified opposition.

The GNP’s official plan is to have the bill passed by the National Assembly’s Foreign Affairs, Trade and Unification Committee (FATUC) by Oct. 18, then by the full assembly by Oct. 28. Internally, the party plans to pass the bill through its own standing committee by that time. The GNP’s plan is to create the appearance that the bill will be passed, even if late, either together with the opposition or with the opposition’s implicit consent.  

snip

The DP, however, held an emergency meeting of its Supreme Council on Wednesday night, when news broke that Congress had passed the FTA law in the U.S. The DP decided to forge a working relationship with the Korean Alliance against the KorUS FTA (KoA). It urgently sent DP Supreme Council member Chung Dong-young, a hardline opponent of the FTA, and other lawmakers whose constituencies encompass agricultural regions, to the FATUC. They let the GNP know of their intention to block any attempt to railroad the bill, even if this meant physically preventing it from taking place.

“Congress’s passing of the ratification bill in the U.S. has effectively made further renegotiation impossible,” said DP floor leader Kim Jin-pyo, meeting a Hankyoreh reporter. “Now all that remains is the choice whether to pass the ratification bill or not. In this situation, all we can do is pick out items such as measures to limit damage suffered by those working in agriculture, fishing and livestock, as well as small and medium traders, and negotiate them one by one.”

link:
http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_business/500777.html

on edit: The DP is the Democratic Party of Korea. They are the opposition to the ruling Grand National Party (GNP) in the National Assembly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's good news. This agreement would be disastrous for our environment
and theirs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. One of the arguments made by its supporters in the states is the Koreans will be driving US made car
Most Koreans here know if you buy a foreign made vehicle you have a 99.99999999999999% of being audited.
It's not a law, it's just (ahem) unfortunate luck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a giveaway to international corporations. That is all.
Our leaders are just traitors in the economic battle in which we are now engaged -- traitors all. And they know it. What is more, they are betraying the US for their personal profit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Aljazeera: South Korean opposition resists US trade pact
Democratic Party seeks to block ratification of the accord on the grounds that it is a "one-sided" deal.

The ruling Grand National Party (GNP) urged opposition legislators on Thursday to swiftly approve the long-delayed agreement but the Democratic Party (DP) says the pact is one-sided. The GNP was negotiating with the opposition to try to pass the deal along with 14 related bills this month.

The GNP has an overwhelming majority in the legislature. But with a general election next April, it has been reluctant to pass the legislation through the house and ignite a televised repetition of past scuffles.

Resource-poor South Korea, whose economy is powered by exports ranging from ships to semiconductors, has aggressively pursued free trade accords. Seven are in effect, including deals with the European Union, India and Southeast Asia.

The US-South Korea deal was signed in June 2007, but was partially renegotiated last year to give US car manufacturers greater access. The DP, which was in office in 2007, says the revision tilted the agreement in favour of Washington and wants renegotiation.

http://english.aljazeera.net//news/asia-pacific/2011/10/2011101362113107304.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yes past scuffles
One of the greatest laws to come out of the end of the coup lead government was the Podium Rule
It gives a new meaning to Legislative Battle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Let's hope they have more integrity than our own Congress,
For once again, we've been sold down the free trade river.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. We'll see. They did approve the South Korea-EU FTA.
It went into effect July 1, 2011. South Korea does more trade with the EU (and China) than it does with the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. But the deal with the EU is less damaging to domestic farming
In addition, the US-Korea FTA makes provincial and local laws subservient to the agreement here in Korea
In the US, state laws trump the agreement
That has been one of the major bones of contention over here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC