Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone see this Anti-OWS handwritten letter? Real or Fake?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:06 PM
Original message
Anyone see this Anti-OWS handwritten letter? Real or Fake?


It sent my bullshit detector flying out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's fake and for an extra bonus, was not written by a college senior. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Do you have references for this? I have Facebook friends who've been
sharing this, and I would love to let them know it's bogus. Thanks in advance!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. No, that's my evaluation.
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 02:19 PM by EFerrari
No one supports themselves on 30 hours of minimum wage work AND saves anything. That's just baloney. And full scholarships for 3.8 is not likely when so many 4.0s go begging. I was 4.0 and was lucky to get two scholarships that partially covered my tuition.

Plus, anyone who has looked knows that the lower-cost state schools have less financial aid to give, so you apply to a higher ranked school if you need scholarships and have the grades.

And if you look at the letter itself, someone took a lot of care about the spelling and the printing but they didn't bother to paragraph. After three plus years of college, most people slip right into a three or four paragraph mode out of habit. This is a list. I don't think a student wrote this, let alone someone who has just been tested for four years.

The next time you see this "student" will be in the Penthouse forum. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. In GA right now, EVERYONE who graduates w/ a 3.0 from HS gets 90% tuition paid and some fees.
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 02:32 PM by aikoaiko
at public colleges and universities. And in some place rent and food can be had for 850 per month. A lot of things would have to go right and there would have to be sacrifices, but its possible.

The letter might be fake but it is possible under certain circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. However, it still misses the fact that the CEO of the min wage job makes 1000 times more (# may vary
than the min wage workers do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. That's true.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. Tuition is only one expense of going to college.
What is the minimum wage in GA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. 7.25 I believe. Fed rate.
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 03:34 PM by aikoaiko
Of course that goes a lot further in rural GA than other places.

Plus a second scholarship (apparently this student had a second one) and can take care of many other costs associated with college.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Except this "student" said both scholarships only partially cover tuition.
So, this student still has to pay some tuition, books, supplies and other fees, plus rent, food, utilities, transportation, insurance and tags if they have a car, clothes and misc. out of about $850 a month. And, they claim they are also saving some on this amount.

Sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Most people couldn't do it.

But some people could if they were lucky.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Most 21 or 22 year olds don't have that kind of impulse control
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 04:04 PM by EFerrari
let alone luck.

Another thing, a real person in this situation and at that age would probably be in a roommate situation. They wouldn't try to fudge the numbers to make the impossible look virtuous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
70. But 30 hours a week at minimum wage is $240 at most, or $960 a month
Even with a scholarship, even in a Southern state, that's not much to go to school on.

The sign may appeal to people who went to school a long time ago. In Minnesota, for example, annual tuition for the University of Minnesota was 300 times the minimum wage in 1968 ($375 at a minimum wage of $1.25). That's right, 300 hours of work per year would pay your basic tuition. For rent, you figured $50-$75 a month per bedroom. So there's another 60 hours of work per month. Food was cheap, too.
In those days, a week's groceries for one person was $20, so there was another 16 hours per week. The hours start to add up at this point, but it was possible to work one's way through college, especially if one took fewer classes than the maximum and graduated in five years instead of four.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
52. ^ Totally agree with EF's analysis ^ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. Also agree with EFerrari's analysis.
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 04:38 PM by Chan790
That was written by a professional copywriter...the telltale marks of a professional writer with PR training are all over it from verbiage to sentence structure.

It's astroturf.

Edit: punctuation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #56
58. By sentence structure do you mean the "I+verb" thing?
It is punchy and totally uncharacteristic of untrained college writing. It's too clean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chan790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #58
61. That and it's clearly professional copy.
It's very tight, there are no wasted words or thoughts. It's clearly been edited and it's polished. Exactly that, it's very clean.

Usually when you see writing by a non-professional or less-experienced writer, they tend to dwell on points needlessly or meander or repeat themselves or leave logical gaps. Even good writers do these things which is why nothing in print is nearly ever first draft. Write first, edit later, tighten it all up in the final copy as the adage goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarLeftFist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. FAKE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. It could be real and written by a fool - a college kid who's been reading Ayn Rand
and thinks he can be John Galt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's how I did it.
My siblings all went to the state university and we all worked to pay our tuition. No student loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. In what years? I paid for my college too, but it was only $2600 a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Late 80's early 90's for me.
My sister got her bachelors/ masters all in the 90's. It's probably more significant that she didn't have any debt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. When did you go to college? The early 70's?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I did it in the late 70's. Between my folks' savings, and several jobs, I got my BA without debt.
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 02:18 PM by Critters2
Not so with graduate school, for which I did need loans. But I realize I was lucky, and probably couldn't do the same today.

And I would never gloat about my good fortune the way this jerk is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. It was easier to accomplish that back then.
And I totally agree with your comment regarding the previous poster.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlimJimmy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. Same here. It's tough, but it can be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, posted multiple times yesterday. It's just Herman Cain saying again,
"If you're unemployed or not rich, it's your fault."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. It sent my who gives a shit detector into orbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Republicon puppetmasters paid for this black-ops disinformation
The Republicon fatcats shot a big wad of money paying some occult PR mindf*ck specialist to create this false propaganda. I heard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AleksS Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. There's website replying to this meme that's
There's website replying to this meme that's both funny and sad.

Worth taking a look:

http://actuallyyourethe47percent.tumblr.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
74. The best one is the waitress/freelance cartoonist/data entry clerk
She claims she doesn't care what the 1 percent pay in taxes because "it's what's left that allows them to eat out, hire employees and buy freelance cartoons."

Uhh...check again, dear; hiring employees and buying freelance cartoons come out of CORPORATE income, not PERSONAL income--and those are ordinary and necessary business expenses, hence TAX DEDUCTIBLE.

Maybe if you trolls didn't hate taxes so much, you might bother to learn how they work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Two scholarships that cover 90% of tuition for a kid with.....
"decent grades"? Not top of the class with a football/sports background? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. At a state school? Nope. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. You may be surprised to learn that in GA, every HS grad with a 3.0 gets 90% of their

public college/university tuition paid and some fees paid. Another second scholarship and you could get all fees and books paid easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. If that's how this kid did it, he should stop boasting about having done it himself.
The people of Georgia paid for his education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #25
28.  Its called the HOPE scholarship in GA and yes all the Lotto and Megamillions players paid fund it

Someone else always pays for the scholarship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a simple pattern Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. That sounds pretty progressive.
That sounds like something that should happen everywhere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. It should and it can.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. And if our budding young scholar got this tuition assistance
How was that funded (taxpayers), and in what universe would it be considered not "handed" to him? Seems there's one standard for assistance when it's doled out others, and quite another standard when our anonymous scrivener is the beneficiary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #40
44. In GA we call it the HOPE scholarship and its earned the same way as most others.

This particular scholarship is funded through lottery profits.

I too think scholarship receivers would think of themselves of fortunate beneficiaries of generosity.

My only point was to dispel the myth that scholarships at state schools do not pay for 90% of tuition.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Not at all
I don't doubt that some states do indeed help students with college tuition, and nothing but good on them. But for the fellow writing his little rugged individual manifesto, it seems highly disingenuous to claim that nothing has been "handed" to him if he was indeed the beneficiary of the HOPE scholarship program. There may be a little myopia in his utopia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. It doesn't look like the Hope Scholarship because that pays all
of tuition, not 90%. On the other hand, since it was projected to go broke next year, it looks like there is now an income cap for families' incomes, caps for tuition costs, and stipulations like you can't use these funds to pay for remedial courses and more that hasn't been announced yet.

And I'm not sure what myth you're talking about but state colleges have less financial aid to give away in the first place. You might get your tuition paid if you qualify and apply in time but there's not much else there to apply for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. The HOPE scholarship changed this year. It used to pay all for HS GPAs >3.0
Edited on Fri Oct-14-11 07:25 PM by aikoaiko

now it pays 90% for GPAs > 3.O and 100% for GPAs > 3.7. That was to solution for more kids being eligible for HOPE than lottery profits could fund.

They talked about family incomes as criteria, but the HOPE was sold as a pure merit scholarship and not a need based scholarship.

Regarding the myth, its apparent to some people in this thread that there arent' scholarship at low cost state universities up to the level of 90% and my point is that there are.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is BS, and anyone who had children who graduated
from college within the last ten years, or has done so themselves, knows it.

My two older kids went to private universities because they had great scholarships. It ended up costing about the same as a public school.

My youngest went to a public school. She had scholarships too, and was in the honors program.

They all lived cheaply and we helped as much as we could. They still have debt, despite their frugality.

I hated seeing them give up so much, but they had to if they wanted a future.

Screw this b.s. I have seen my own family, and others make real sacrifices and still end up with debt, unemployment or Wal-Mart level jobs.

This type of b.s. is exactly why we are angry. Shove that missive up your ass, lying scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
16. If "started saving money for school at 17", how much can you earn in 1 yr while
going to highschool? Otherwise, congratulations on your getting a college degree without debt. Good luck finding a job that pays you enough to afford an apartment that is not subsidized by socialistic scholarships or pell grants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roselma Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Probably b.s., but it misses the point altogether. OWS is NOT
ASKING for a handout from government or charity. It is a straw man argument to suggest that they are by posting crap like the note in the photo. Is the idea to suggest that OWS is about sucking off the government teat and that this fine person isn't sucking? If so, it means n.o.t.h.i.n.g. OWS is NOT about wanting handouts from the government. It is about income inequality and about the fact that the high rollers on Wall Street destroyed our economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. Do you feel the CEO of the company should make 1000 times more than you?
Why?

I'd like to see the answers that person gives as they miss the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
24. People in the 99 % are not there by doing something wrong
like the example in the picture, you can do everything you consider "right" yet you still end up in the 99 %. Upward mobility, salaries, interest rates are all down. There is no indication that Americans have suddenly become lazy. In today's America you can do everything right and still find yourself falling behind, in debt, in poverty. The sign does nothing to address this problem or indicate the writer even understands the problems associated with the 99 %.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
51. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. "I wanted to respond to you as a liberal."
"Because, although I think you’ve made yourself clear and I think I understand you, you don’t seem to understand me at all. I hope you will read this and understand me better, and maybe understand the Occupy Wall Street movement better."
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/12/1025555/-Open-Letter-to-that-53-Guy?via=search

Best response yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
30. Sees himself as a John Galt encountering an Ayn Rand sighing "take me!" at his desk on Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. Fe fi fo fum I smell a big, stinking pile of bullshit
That scenario might have been possible until the early 70s when minimum wage was enough that you could live on it (usually with roommates) working 30 hours a week. It's been total bullshit since then.

Whoever wrote this is older than god or an idiot or both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kctim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
33. Real or fake?
Apparently, it depends if you support the view or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #33
67. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
34. FAKE as ever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who cares.....they are STILL in the 99%
For all that fancy college education, they are too stupid to realize it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agent46 Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
36. It's a slave manifesto
Poor corporatized thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
39. So how was the tuition payed for?
It says only that he/she pays for living expenses and is debt free.

Daddy picking up that check?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. It's Cain's "economist" and that's why he doesn't show his face.
If he is so proud of his accomplishments, step forth and identify yourself. Nothing to be ashamed of, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
42. Even if it is real...who cares...the author clearly is stupid
and doesn't even realize they are making strong points FOR -OWS-, not against!

A fool with a 3.8gpa. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
48. He does not understand what the 99% is/means.
It is everyone who is not in the top 1% financially, which means almost everyone. It is not a person's decision to be part of that group; it's just the way it is for almost all people. Though he may misunderstand the movement, look down on it and choose not to be part of it, he IS part of the 99%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aerows Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
49. FAKE
Full of crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
53. "moderately-priced, in-state public university"
In other words, taxpayer-supported and artificially cheap.

Doubtless he or she uses the taxpayer-subsidized library computers and internet access in lieu of owning his/her own computer/smartphone/tablet with his/her own internet account.

Decent grades in high school... would that be a taxpayer-funded high school? Most likely.

"Started saving for school at age 19". We don't know how old this student it. He/she could be 30, which means he/she had to put off school for over a decade doing a job for which a higher-education was not needed, in order to attend this taxpayer-subsidized cheap university. So because he/she didn't want to take student loans at a high, for-profit APR, he/she loses a decade of well-paying, college-educated, career employment (and the attendant retirement and SSI benefits) at the modest price of a low-percentage college loan, replacing it instead with a decade of low-wage work.

Yeah, that's the GOP plan in action... :sarcasm:


And what if this oh-so-hard student got his girlfriend/wife pregnant (male) or got pregnant (female)? Well, abortion is now outlawed, so guess what? You have to make a choice... kid or college?

And of course your 30-hour-a-week minimum wage job has no benefits, you can't afford private insurance, and Medicare has just been privatized. What do you do, hot shot?

Prayer that the kid's born healthy and you/your wife/your girlfriend don't rip themselves apart or DIE in the birthing process?




What a crock of shit.



Thom Hartmann was able to do this in the pre-Reagan era. I doubt it's happening now.


And if it is.... then this person ISN'T part of the 99%. Somehow, through some fluke of statistics, this person has resisted the rampant commercial message (making him a terrorist supporter, remember) and avoided catastrophic job loss, predatory lending, etc., to triumph.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
55. It's on the Internet, so it has to be real
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #55
62. ...
Edited on Sat Oct-15-11 07:52 AM by krispos42
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greendog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
57. Strathmore Series 300 Drawing Paper
14"x 17". $15.75 for a pad of 50 sheets. Really nice hand printing.

This probably came from the Art Dept. of some right wing think tank. The kid who did this was probably paid 10 bucks an hour and has $60,000 in Art School debt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigmack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-11 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
59. I posted this on three different posts of this POS...
(I stole at least part of it from somebody on DU.. Thanks, whoever!)

That's nice, kid. Get back to me in 20 years' time when you no longer have access to cheap student accommodation, your savings have been wiped out by an illness or other catastrophic event, and you're still working in those three minimum wage jobs because all the good jobs have been outsourced to India by that same 1% whose culpability you doggedly refuse to acknowledge. As for making it through college on two scholarships that paid for 90% of your tuition, that is about about as rare as unicorn sightings. You are correct about one thing, you are not the 99%. Everyone else is up to their eyes in debt paying for college. I am going to assume you are part of some organization that is footing their bills because I can't imagine someone getting a 3.8 is getting a free ride.... with your "decent" grades in High School. See how much you will enjoy being laid off while in your mid forties or fifties, and how your various meds cost more than you make. Oh.. don't get sick or hurt.
You obviously didn't take Economics, or you'd realize Wall Street's bad decisions and frauds are costing us all and there's more cost to come. Grow up and look around at what's happening. You are being screwed and you don't seem to even know it. Oh... and another thing, kid. You're not debt free. The clowns in both parties who run this country spent $2 Trillion on wars of choice. Your share of that is about $7K. Today's Wall Street Journal will tell you that wages are down in this country and won't rise for at least 10 years. There are 5 unemployed for every job opening. Median household income fell 23% between 2007 and 2009, and half of American workers now make $500 a week or less. The US has the 2nd lowest economic mobility in the developed world. So... considering your war debt and stagnant wages and the unemployment picture and the fact that you won't be buying a house anytime soon.... I have one question: Why aren't you in the streets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-15-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
63. Only if s/he also sells drugs or is a hooker.
There's just no way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
65. FAIL. Regardless of any (albeit bouncy) success you're still one of us.
You won't be in the 1%...ever, I'm guessing. This is too stupid to even deal with, why do folks give it legs?

Enjoy the job market. Bouncy bouncy bouncy picture poster. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
68. Doesn't show his face. Therefore, fake
It's pretty simple. If the letter was true, we'd see the writer's face. The genre includes the portrait. The only reason to hide the face is because revealing it would disprove the letter, when people who see you and know you dispute it. There's no legitimate reason to hide your face in these things. Unless the letter is bullshit.

End of analysis, and end of fucking story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #68
76. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-11 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
69. Is it handwritten? Looks more like some artsy font. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
71. Surely we have some handwriting analysts here?
That sign is way too big to have come from a real steno pad. It would be great if someone with serious expertise did an analysis of all the fake signs and clustered them in groups probably written by the same person. Seems the assholes have learned about how easily photoshopping can be traced via the internets tubes, and aren't using faces as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
72. RW agitprop that mixes the vaguely personal with the overtly
ideological.

Here's the real question: why is this person unwilling to show his (I'm guessing his b/c of the diction) or her face?????? You would think, from the smug and arrogant tone of the poster, that he or she is proud of his or her accomplishments.

My guess is that the person hodling this sign is a known RW shill and would be recognized as such.

Most, if not all, OWS protesters are not afraid to be seen and photographed with their signs (at least at Occupy Los Angeles).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsherWI Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
73. 100% fake
Another lovely photoshop job done by the RNC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-11 02:51 AM
Response to Original message
75. Nice cable tv cord in the background... I call fake for the "thrifty college student".
Edited on Tue Oct-18-11 02:59 AM by Fearless
Also Mr./Ms. "I expect nothing given to me" gets scholarships and goes to a public university. Oops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC